Channel
@Filoloqlar123
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,987subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001165618323 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Filoloqlar123 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Filoloqlar123 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 5,987 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 5,992 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 5,995 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 5,995 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 August 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,630 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 75.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hansı cümlədə mürəkkəb zərf işlənməmişdir?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
✅ Feili bağlama şəkilçiləri (hamısı qrammatik şəkilçilərdir) ✅ Bu şəkilçilər hərəkətin zamanını, səbəbini, tərzini və ya şərtini bildirir. ✅ -ıb/-ib/-ub/-üb, -araq/-ərək: İşin əsas feildəki işdən əvvəl icra olunduğunu, tərzini və ya səbəbini bildirir. Düşmən qorxub (səbəb)geri çəkildi. Dərsi qurtarıb (-araq) zaman) evə getdi. Kitaba baxıb (tərz) danışdı. ✅ -madan/-mədən: Hərəkətin zamanını, tərzini və ya şərtini bild…
👍1
Tərkibinə görə fərqlənən sözü tapın:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Qorxut sözü
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📚Qeyd: Ümumiləşdirici sözü olan sadə cümlələrlə aydınlaşdırma əlaqəli tabesiz mürəkkəb cümlələri fərqləndirməyin yolları ✍ ✅Ümumiləşdirici sözlərdən əvvəl və ya sonra gələn sözlər həmcins üzvlərdir. ✅Sintaktik təhlil zamanı həmcins üzvlər ümumiləşdirici sözlə eyni cümlə üzvünün sualına cavab verir. Sadə cümlədə tərkib hissə ola bilmir, yəni mürəkkəb cümlədəki kimi sadə cümlə formasını əmələ gətirmir. ✅Məsəl üçün, "D…
👍1
"Xəstələndiyi üçün gecikənlər onlardır" cümləsində zərfliyin hansı növü işlənib?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
File, posted without a caption
Hansı cümlədə baş üzvlərin heç biri söz birləşməsi ilə ifadə olunmayıb?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1
M.P. Vaqif və Q. Zakir yaradıcılığı oxşarlıq: ✓Hər iki şair həm əruz, həm də heca vəznində şeirlər yazmışdır. ✓Hər iki şairin yaradıcılığında qoşma janrı xüsusi yer tutur. ✓Hər iki şair qoşmalarında rədiflərdən istifadə etmişdir. ✓Hər iki şairin şeirlərində məhəbbət mövzusuna ayrıca yer verilir. https://t.me/Filoloqlar123
❤1
📚Qeyd: ✅Yer zərfliyinin "haranı?" sualı yoxdur. Bu, tamamlığın sualıdır. ✅Cümlədə mübtəda, tamamlıq və zərflik heç zaman bir-biri ilə sintaktik əlaqədə olmur. ✅Tamamlıq və zərflik xəbərdən, xəbər isə mübtədadan asılı olur. ✅Yer zərfliyi "hara?", "harada?", "haradan?" suallarına cavab verir. ✅Cümlənin baş üzvləri (mübtəda və xəbər) və ikinci dərəcəli üzvlər (tamamlıq, təyin, zərflik) arasında müəyyən sintaktik əlaqəl…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Filoloqlar123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Hansı cümlədə mürəkkəb zərf işlənməmişdir?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Tərkibinə görə fərqlənən sözü tapın:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Qorxut sözü
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
"Xəstələndiyi üçün gecikənlər onlardır" cümləsində zərfliyin hansı növü işlənib?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Hansı cümlədə baş üzvlərin heç biri söz birləşməsi ilə ifadə olunmayıb?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Azərbaycan dili və Ədəbiyyat” (@Filoloqlar123), 5,987 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Filoloqlar123.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.