Channel
@Fight_For_A_Future_uncensored
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,212subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001891550121 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fight_For_A_Future_uncensored |
| Description | Uncensored leftist politics 🚩 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fight_For_A_Future_uncensored |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 3,212 | no change |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 3,212 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 6 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,310 reactions across 15 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 906 | 69.2% | |
| 🔥 | 93 | 7.10% | |
| 🤬 | 68 | 5.19% | |
| 🫡 | 43 | 3.28% | |
| 🥰 | 38 | 2.90% | |
| 🤣 | 27 | 2.06% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 1.91% | |
| 💯 | 20 | 1.53% | |
| 💔 | 17 | 1.30% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 1.15% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 0.84% | |
| 🤨 | 10 | 0.763% | |
| 💅 | 9 | 0.687% | |
| 🦄 | 8 | 0.611% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 0.382% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.305% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 0.229% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.153% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.153% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.076% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.229% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,310 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2025 to 15 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Another racist driven out by angry locals in Manchester today. The people of Britain are sick and tired of fascists preaching race hate and facing no consequences for their actions.
🤣19❤16👎1👏1💩1
Fascist "activist" Ryan Bridge takes a punch to the face from locals in Brighton ⚒️🚩
🔥37❤15💯4
🔻🔻🔻
❤4
Photos show Elbit's Israeli weapons epicentre in Czech Republic destroyed after it was set ablaze by the Earthquake Faction. The site is central to the European operations of Israel's biggest weapons producer. Now, it's in flames. We are in the belly of the beast, surrounded by the stench of evil. The technology, weaponry and capital needed to maintain the imperial and Zionist violence are all within our reach. The…
❤64🔥16🥰5🦄2😁2
Spotted in Minneapolis
❤55🥰16🤩2👏1🔥1
ISIS flag raised over Raqqa for the first time in years after HTS gangs capture the city from the SDF.
🤬68💔17👎3❤1
Spotted in Minneapolis
❤86💅9🥰8❤🔥3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤63🤣8🔥1🤔1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤99🔥18🫡8🖕3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤82👍8👎7🔥6🤔3🫡2😭1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤65👍8🔥5
Photo, posted without a caption
❤80💯16👍6😁3🥱1🦄1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Fight_For_A_Future_uncensored. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fight For a Future” (@Fight_For_A_Future_uncensored), 3,212 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fight_For_A_Future_uncensored.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.