Channel
@Fepo_Communityy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,300subscribers
-52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003910389735 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Fepo_Communityy |
| Created | 19 April 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Fepo_Communityy |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 03:04 | 2,300 | -13 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 14:42 | 2,313 | -11 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 2,324 | -25 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:02 | 2,349 | -15 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 2,364 | -50 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:38 | 2,414 | -27 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:42 | 2,441 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:45 | 2,437 | +6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 2,431 | +19 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:39 | 2,412 | +7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 2,405 | +21 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 2,384 | +6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 2,378 | +7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 2,371 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 2,368 | +16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 2,352 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 2,352 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 19 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
50 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 58.0% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 14.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 8.00% | |
| 🥴 | 4 | 8.00% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.00% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 2.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hey everyone, I’m truly sorry for the long delay. I recently went on vacation and also had several other commitments, which made it difficult for me to give enough time to this project. Thank you so much for your patience, understanding, and continued support. ❤️ The good news is that the bot has now been completely redesigned and improved, with many new services available! ✨ New Services: • Gemini 18-Month Link —…
❤6
I sincerely apologize for the delay. For the past few weeks, I couldn’t make new improvements to the bot as quickly as I wanted, and I truly appreciate your patience and support. Gemini New Added and Gemini Verification are now working perfectly. We have also added a new Market feature. Now you can use the /start command or /market command to buy available products from the store, such as Perplexity, ChatGPT, and …
❤5
Gemini 1 Year Pixel Verify (new added) is now Working Perfectly! Chatgpt Bussiness Admin Panel. Chatgpt Plus 1 Month. Chatgpt Pro 5x . Microsoft 365 Lifetime Account. Claude Max Invitation 1 Year . Claude, Gemini, Gpt, API Avaliable Contact{@M_Abc123456}.
❤2
⚠️ Important Update for All Users ⚠️ Many users reported that the previous extension is not working properly. ✅ Kindly use this new extension from now on. Please install/open this one and try again. 🟢 Gemini Verification is working perfectly. But Gemini Verification (New Added) is currently not working. 🔁 Users who have credits in Gemini Verification (New Added) can exchange/transfer their credits to Gemini Verif…
👍4💔2😢2❤1
Extension Updated Now Work Perfectly!
🔥2🥴2
📢 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗕𝗟𝗘𝗠 𝗙𝗜𝗫𝗘𝗗 ✅ The previous method stopped working again, and the same issue came back: 🚫 Start Trial button is not working ✅ Here is the new solution: 1️⃣ Download the extension provided below 2️⃣ Open the extension before pressing Start Trial 3️⃣ Turn ON the extension button 4️⃣ Then press Start Trial — simple ✅ 📱 Mobile Users: If you don’t have a PC, download Kiwi Browser and install the extension there. ⚠…
❤5🥴1😢1
ChatGPT Pro & Plus Available 1 Month Plan & 1 Year Plus Plan Currently provided manually for proper service. If orders get heavy, it will be integrated into the bot.
The users who are facing the problem "Start Trial " Button not Work! . Do This: Just replace the "partner-eft-onboard" text with "offer" in the link For example: Before: https://one.google.com/partner-eft-onboard/2H50KPCFG5NW8NFV6Y49 After: https://one.google.com/offer/2H50KPCFG5NW8NFV6Y49 Doing this will work!
❤8😢3
@Everyone ❤️ The bot is completely fine now and running smoothly again! Currently ChatGPT 1 Month and ChatGPT 1 Year are not available, but ChatGPT Go 1 Year will be added very soon 🚀 And most importantly, we want everyone to feel safe and confident using our service. If even for one day the bot gets banned, the channel faces issues, or anything unexpected happens — please don’t worry. We now have a secure backup…
The Gemini Verification Is Now Working! If you face Any problems Contact: "@M_Abc123456"
👏1
We sincerely apologize to everyone facing the “Start Trial” button not working issue. Please understand that this problem was not caused by the bot or the robot. The issue is coming from Google’s official side, and at the moment it is beyond our control. Once it is fully confirmed that the Gemini Pixel offer has officially ended there, we will proceed with refunds. Refunds will be given to users who still have rem…
🤯1🥴1
Make Sure Must you have 1:ADD Authenticator. 2: Turn on 2 step verification 3:Delete Passkeys. If Still fail OR uneligible Check this: Failure Self-Check Guide If an account shows failed, please check the following 4 items one by one. Every link can be opened directly or copied with one click. 1. Check whether 2-Step Verification is enabled Make sure the Google account shows 2-Step Verification enabled in green s…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Fepo_Communityy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fepo Community” (@Fepo_Communityy), 2,300 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Fepo_Communityy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.