As many of you know, last week I purchased a $1M funded challenge from Sabio Trade. What I really liked compared to many other prop firms is that it has only one evaluation phase instead of multiple steps. On top of that, they offer a $1 million challenge, and their pricing is very competitive. I've now partnered with Sabio Trade, which means I can also offer you an exclusive 30% discount. If you're thinking about…

Channel
Fan Crypto
@FanCryptocurrency
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
1,960subscribers
-85 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001409293121 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FanCryptocurrency |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FanCryptocurrency |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 1,960 | -8 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 06:58 | 1,968 | -9 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 1,977 | -16 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 1,993 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 1,998 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:59 | 2,001 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 2,007 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:35 | 2,015 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 2,023 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 2,025 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:09 | 2,026 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 2,028 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 2,035 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:49 | 2,034 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 2,040 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:52 | 2,045 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 2,045 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
24 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 58.3% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 16.7% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 8.33% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
I'm sure we all been here, some still are... https://www.tradingview.com/chart/XAUUSD/EmTrSsot-The-House-Money-Effect-Why-Traders-Give-Back-Their-Profits/
#BTC retested the broken rising wedge and started to drop again Probably will fall under 60k
🥰2
Everyone is talking about how to pass a prop firm challenge. Very few talk about what you're actually trying to achieve. The biggest mistake isn't overtrading, revenge trading or using too much leverage. It's misunderstanding the mathematics behind the challenge. Why does losing just 2% make the challenge significantly harder? Why can trading Gold with high leverage actually reduce your chances of getting funded…
👏4🤯1
Nasty Rising wedge on BTC
❤3
I believe BTC will break up
❤1
Before every trade, I ask myself a series of questions. Not because I like to overcomplicate things, but because over the years I've learned that the quality of my questions determines the quality of my trades. In this article, I try to explain exactly how I think before risking a single dollar and why having a market opinion is never enough to justify opening a position. https://www.tradingview.com/chart/GOLD/yWx…
Read it and learn it by heart!!!! https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/E9rAuC42-Manipulation-It-s-How-Markets-Have-Always-Worked/
From 2 years ago i say and write about one thing when it comes to crypto:" altcoin season will not come" I m curios, do you still believe it will come at some moment?
- Yes25%
- No62%
- All alts will rise to ATHs15%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
From next week i will get back and this time i will really finish my site. How would you feel about a weekly educational newsletter?
- I will subscribe87%
- Not interested14%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤3
I line with my article, what do you think is a realistic % monthly growth expectation?
- 100%13%
- 50%7%
- 30%10%
- 20%18%
- 10%26%
- 5%32%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
My Thoughts on the topic :) https://www.tradingview.com/chart/XAUUSD/AcihPlar-Growing-a-100-Trading-Account-Is-a-Dream/
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FanCryptocurrency. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
From 2 years ago i say and write about one thing when it comes to crypto:" altcoin season will not come" I m curios, do you still believe it will come at some moment?
- Yes25%
- No62%
- All alts will rise to ATHs15%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
From next week i will get back and this time i will really finish my site. How would you feel about a weekly educational newsletter?
- I will subscribe87%
- Not interested14%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
I line with my article, what do you think is a realistic % monthly growth expectation?
- 100%13%
- 50%7%
- 30%10%
- 20%18%
- 10%26%
- 5%32%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fan Crypto” (@FanCryptocurrency), 1,960 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FanCryptocurrency.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.