Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐅𝐋𝐈𝐂𝐊𝐄𝐑 𝐕𝐈𝐋𝐄 𝐂𝐋𝐀𝐍

Channel

𝐅𝐋𝐈𝐂𝐊𝐄𝐑 𝐕𝐈𝐋𝐄 𝐂𝐋𝐀𝐍

@FLICKERVILE

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,315subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004387691354
TypeChannel
Username@FLICKERVILE
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 6 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/FLICKERVILE

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@FLICKERVILE was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@CALIIFORNIAFAM
held 6 August 20266 August 2026

Growth

2,3092,3622,335.56 August 2026 — 2,309 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,315 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,362 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,356 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,311 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,311 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,315 subscribers2,3156 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,301–2,370 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 08:562,315+4
13 Sept 2026, 13:222,311no change
13 Sept 2026, 12:472,311-45
13 Aug 2026, 23:472,356-6
10 Aug 2026, 13:512,362+47
7 Aug 2026, 07:082,315+6
6 Aug 2026, 11:492,309first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.44%
avg views ÷ 2,315 subscribers
Avg views / post
33.4
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026
Posts held55 (6 August 202613 September 2026)
Views total668
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52806497319476466191100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 13 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Sept 2026, 11:31 UTC9 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @NEVMENOZPROJECTPhoto

Восхождение роковой луны, как светлый путь, В коалиции, где сбываются мечты. Танец теней, и в сердце — магия, Вместе мы преодолеем любую трагедию. @NEVMENOZPROJECT заключили союз с @FLICKERVILE

13 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC22 viewsread 13 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed Ꮁᴩᴏбᴏʙщиᴋ.

13 Sept 2026, 10:54 UTC17 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @FK0NIXXAIPhoto

❤️⭐𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗢𝗡 @FLICKERVILE & @FK0NIXXAI С сегодняшнего дня наш путь един, а две истории переплетаются в одну.

Signed Ꮁᴩᴏбᴏʙщиᴋ.

13 Sept 2026, 10:19 UTC25 viewsread 13 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed Ꮁᴩᴏбᴏʙщиᴋ.

13 Sept 2026, 10:18 UTC33 viewsread 13 September 2026
Photo

😀😀😀🤩🤩🌟🤩🤩 😀😀😀😀Есть союзы, 😀😀😀😀 заключённые 😀😀😀😀 словами, а есть те, которым слова уже не нужны. Они рождаются там, где две дороги пересекаются среди тьмы, где прошлое остаётся позади, а впереди остаётся только один путь. Не случайность и не обещание — выбор, сделанный однажды и принятый без возможности вернуть всё назад. Пусть эта ночь станет свидетелем новой связи. Пусть время стирает имена с чужих страниц, но не ко

Signed Ꮁᴩᴏбᴏʙщиᴋ.

13 Sept 2026, 10:18 UTC17 viewsread 13 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed Ꮁᴩᴏбᴏʙщиᴋ.

13 Sept 2026, 08:42 UTC28 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @patriarcha11

патриархальные перезаключили союз с прекрасными @FLICKERVILE

Signed Ꮁᴩᴏбᴏʙщиᴋ.

13 Sept 2026, 07:51 UTC32 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @LOZANSKIE

+ @FLICKERVILE 🐈‍⬛

Signed Med'Frère

13 Sept 2026, 07:50 UTC30 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @wasp_fmPhoto

«В этом союзе есть место свободе и верности, страсти и спокойствию, амбициям и заботе. Мы не растворяемся друг в друге — мы усиливаем друг друга. Мы не теряем себя — мы находим новую версию себя рядом с любимым человеком.» ❤️Wasp заключил союз с @FLICKERVILE

Signed Med'Frère

13 Sept 2026, 06:02 UTC70 viewsread 13 September 2026
Photo

😀😀😀🤩🤩🌟🤩🤩 😀😀😀😀Есть союзы, 😀😀😀😀 заключённые 😀😀😀😀 словами, а есть те, которым слова уже не нужны. Они рождаются там, где две дороги пересекаются среди тьмы, где прошлое остаётся позади, а впереди остаётся только один путь. Не случайность и не обещание — выбор, сделанный однажды и принятый без возможности вернуть всё назад. Пусть эта ночь станет свидетелем новой связи. Пусть время стирает имена с чужих страниц, но не ко

Signed Med'Frère

12 Sept 2026, 17:58 UTC53 viewsread 13 September 2026

предупреждаю на будущее, я смотрю по коммам, то есть в ответ под постом с требованиеями

Signed Med'Frère

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @FLICKERVILE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐅𝐋𝐈𝐂𝐊𝐄𝐑 𝐕𝐈𝐋𝐄 𝐂𝐋𝐀𝐍” (@FLICKERVILE), 2,315 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FLICKERVILE.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.