These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
2,940 average views per post against 4,060 subscribers โ an engagement rate of 72.5%. Across the 5,024 registered channels in the same cohort โ 3,166โ9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in English โ the middle half sit between 2.37% and 13.8%, with a median of 6.19%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (7 August 2026 โ 6 September 2026)
Posts measured
20 of 20 published in the window (3 exact, 17 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
58,860
Mature posts only
83.2% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
ยฑ0.074% of the figure, from Telegramโs rounding
Post language
English ยท 100.0% of the windowโs posts
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3ร away from that cohortโs median โ above it โ on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes โ audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelโs own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 6 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 8 days, net +846. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 3,087โ4,187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 14:54
4,060
+83
30 Aug 2026, 13:26
3,977
+253
28 Aug 2026, 00:09
3,724
+459
25 Aug 2026, 09:45
3,265
+51
25 Aug 2026, 04:00
3,214
no change
25 Aug 2026, 03:45
3,214
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
72.5%
avg views รท 4,060 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,940
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.071%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held
20 (15 August 2026 โ 24 August 2026)
Views total
58,860
Reactions total
24
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
24 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
15
62.5%
๐
9
37.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 August 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
โ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธ๐๐ก๐ก๐กโคต๏ธโคต๏ธ
๐ https://goldrummy13.com/?code=JLXBBL9BBX1&t=1787106391
๐ https://goldrummy13.com/?code=JLXBBL9BBX1&t=1787106391
Go Go High Bonus ๐๐ฅ
Good Morning Bhai Log !! โค๏ธ๐
Are You Ready For New Yono App !! ๐ฑ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EveryYonoStore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ป๐ผ ๐ฆ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒโ (@EveryYonoStore), 4,060 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EveryYonoStore.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
