Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 24 days, net -155. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,544–2,762 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 22:20
2,575
+6
12 Sept 2026, 14:59
2,569
-52
8 Sept 2026, 17:37
2,621
-15
3 Sept 2026, 09:06
2,636
-25
30 Aug 2026, 18:35
2,661
-28
28 Aug 2026, 02:08
2,689
-48
24 Aug 2026, 22:47
2,737
+7
24 Aug 2026, 01:00
2,730
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 07s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
264 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
193
73.1%
❤
38
14.4%
😭
21
7.95%
🍓
9
3.41%
🤝
3
1.14%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 264 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EvasPlay. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
چند دقیقه هیچ چیز نشنیدم. فکر کردم یا مرده و در دنیای دیگری هستم یا تنها آدم زندهام. عصبی و وحشتزده شدم و نمیدانستم چهکار باید کنم، چون چیزی نمیدیدم...
بعد از چهار یا پنج دقیقه که من هنوز داشتم دور خودم میگشتم تا راه را پیدا کنم، صدای زن جوانی را شنیدم. داشت گریه میکرد و میگفت
خدایا لطفاً نگذار من بمیرم. نگذار بمیرم.» از شنیدن صدای این خانم خیلی خوشحال شده بودم. گفتم: «حرف بزن، حرف بزن، من یک آتشنشانم، با ص…
عمل قلقلک دادن را در نظر بگیرید!
تقریباً غیرممکن است که بتوانید خودتان را قلقلک دهید.
فریت به همراه سارا جین بلیکمور و دنیل ولپرت دلیل این امر را نشان دادند.
در یک سری تحقیقات که بر روی افراد سالم انجام شد، محققان دریافتند که وقتی افراد دستِ چپ خودشان را لمس میکردند در مقایسه با وقتیکه شخص دیگری دست آنها را لمس میکرد،
چند ناحیه مغز فعالیت کمتری داشتند. مغز، پاسخ خود به حسهای لمسی که خودش تولید میکند را سرکوب می…
نمیدانم شما هرگز این حال را احساس کردهاید؟
وقتی از چیزی سخت ترسیده باشید یا وقتی دقایق بسیار ناگواری را میگذرانید، وقتی عقل آدم سر جاست ولی دیگر هیچ توانایی برایش نمانده است؟
من گمان میکنم مثل وقتی که آدم در برابر یک خطر حتمی است مثلا وقتی خانه دارد روی سر آدم خراب میشود ، آدم عجیب میخواهد بنشیند و چشمهایش را ببندد و منتظر بماند تا هرچه میخواهد پیش آید.
ابله - داستایوفسکی
زکاری ارنست، ۱۸ ساله و در ترم دوم دانشگاه بود که اولین حمله صرع خود را تجربه کرد. زک به همراه دوستش در اتاق خوابگاهش نشسته بود که ناگهان احساس وحشت کرد. ناگهان خلقوخوی او به شکل وحشتناکی بد شد و او شروع به شنیدن صدای آهنگی کرد که معلوم نبود از کجا میآید. زک که وحشتزده شده بود، از دوستش خواست او را به خانه والدینش که در همان نزدیکی بود، ببرد. این وقایع انرژی او را تحلیل برده بودند. زک فکر میکرد این فقط یک حمله عصب…
- اگر اجازه دهید علاقمندم وکیل مدافع شیطان شوم و بپرسم چرا چنین روی حقیقت تعصب دارید؟ حقیقت برای بیمار امروز صبح من چه فایدهای دارد؟
نیچه : + حقیقت به خودی خود مقدس نیست. این جستجو برای حقیقت است که مقدس است. آیا کاری مقدستر از خودشناسی وجود دارد؟... برخی میگویند آثار فلسفی من پایه و اساس ندارد، چرا که دیدگاه من دائماً در حال تغییر است. اما من در یکی از جملات ماندگارم میگویم: «به آنکه هستی، تبدیل شو» اما بدون حق…
دریغا سرزمین نگون بخت، که اگرچه چهره خود ببیند میترسد.
زمانی اسمش مادر ما بود، اما اکنون قبر ماست.
هیچ چیزی در آن نیست که وقتی آن را دیدی لبخند بر لبت آوری،مگر اینکه کسی باشی که هیچچیز نمیفهمی. مردمش آهها، ناله ها و فریاد هارا میشنوند و چیزی نمیگویند. غمزدگیهای جانکاهش مثل سرمستی ای مدرن گردیده است.
ناقوس عزا که بانگ بردارد کمتر کسی میپرسد برای کیست. عمر خوبانش کوتاهتر از عمر گلهایی است که به کلاهها میزنند.…
❤🔥42
Signed 𝑅𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑐̧𝑐̧ꪖ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EvasPlay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ 𝔈 v a” (@EvasPlay), 2,575 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EvasPlay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.