4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +127. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,692–1,857 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 15:16
1,838
+15
11 Aug 2026, 18:41
1,823
+34
8 Aug 2026, 23:03
1,789
+78
8 Aug 2026, 07:47
1,711
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 1 November 2018 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 1,838 subscribers
Avg views / post
207
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.483%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
10 (1 November 2018 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
414
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
26 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
14
53.8%
👏
6
23.1%
👍
4
15.4%
👌
1
3.85%
😱
1
3.85%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2018 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
الجماعة بتوع Kimi عاملين حفلة هدايا من الشهر اللي فات بعد إطلاق Kimi 3
النماذج الصينية تخفيضاتها نادرة
لكن هتقدر تاخد بعد التسجيل هدية غالباً بتكون 3 أيام ببلاش
كل تسجيل من لينك الدعوة بتاعك بيديلك فرصة سحب على هدية إضافية
زي اللينك ده:
https://kimi-bot.com/activities/invite/share?scenario=invite&from=share_poster&invitation_code=DZBDSR
لما تدخل على Invite & Earn بيديلك صورة فيها QR
اعمله سكان عشان تاخد اللينك
لا…
🚨 HIGGSFIELD 12-MONTH CREATOR REWARD — 600 CREDITS EVERY MONTH
“Creator Anniversary Reward” has supposedly appeared for selected Higgsfield accounts, providing a full year of creator access with monthly credits.
🎁 FICTIONAL REWARD DETAILS
✅ 12 months of account access
✅ 600 credits renewed every 30 days
✅ 7,200 total credits across the year
✅ Access to supported image and video models
✅ HD exports on eligible gene…
10 آلاف كريديت تقدر تستفيد بيهم على مدار أسبوعين تقريباً في Figma
حسابات فيجما متاحة ببلاش، 300 جنيه في السنة، لكن تقدر تستفيد بالكريديتس من غيرهم
Redeem Link:
https://eshterysa7.com/Figma10k
وده عدد كريديت كبير جداً،اللينك ده مش هيطول
___
لينكات اشتراك أدوبي من شهر لـ4 شهور:
https://t.me/EshterySa7/2334
ثريد مهم على X للمبرمجين:
https://x.com/i/status/2059933955584110980
اللي مهتمين بالبينش مارك وترتيب النماذج في الكودينج محتاجين يقرأوا التفاصيل اللي مكتوبة كلها في الثريد ده واللي اتبنى عليها ترتيب النماذج الجديد
43000 Credits From Anything.ai
ده website builder لشغل الـfull stack
حاجات تخص السادة المبرمجين
1- هتعمل أكاونت من هنا
2- هتروح على أول لينك هنا تعمل Claim 20000 Credits
وبعدين هتعمل نفس الكلام هنا
الناس خلاص حفظت نظام استهلاك الكريديتس في الحاجات دي، الأسعار غالية وكل موقع ساحب كابل من باقي الشركات وجمعية ودايرة إنتا استفيد منها وخلاص، فلو محتاجه اعمل أكاونتات تكفيك واعملها بلينك الدعوة بتاع الأكاونت الأولاني…
200 دولار رصيد مجاني تستخدم بيهم APIs من 38 مودل
هنا:
https://pioneer.ai/
مش محتاج كارت كريديت، ولو كنت بتعرف تنجز شغلك على OPUS 4.7 فهو مجاني على الخطة المدفوعة (20 دولار/شهر) لحد 31 أغسطس
نوعيات البهاريز دي حلوة وهي لسه مش مشهورة
عندك Projects كتير اشتغل بكذا أكاونت وطلع APIs زي ما إنتا عايز
وأنا عارف إن دي رسالة تفيد المطورين فقط، وإنهم ناس معاهم شاشات لمس وحريفة عليها المفروض، لكن دي أكتر فئة مستوى توقعاتي لخب…
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @EshterySa7_AI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 16,547 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EshterySa7 - AI Community” (@EshterySa7_AI), 1,838 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EshterySa7_AI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.