12 measurements spanning 34 days, net +48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,845–8,907 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 16:39
8,900
+14
3 Sept 2026, 11:37
8,886
+6
31 Aug 2026, 14:08
8,880
-3
28 Aug 2026, 23:17
8,883
-13
25 Aug 2026, 17:26
8,896
+12
23 Aug 2026, 02:13
8,884
+12
19 Aug 2026, 05:53
8,872
+9
16 Aug 2026, 08:53
8,863
-14
12 Aug 2026, 11:34
8,877
+2
9 Aug 2026, 06:01
8,875
+23
6 Aug 2026, 03:00
8,852
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:57
8,852
first reading
Engagement
163 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.43%
avg views ÷ 8,900 subscribers
Avg views / post
661
114 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
114
of 163 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
163 (3 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
75,372
Reactions total
1,934
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,530 reactions across 147 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,450
57.3%
🔥
515
20.4%
👍
445
17.6%
👌
111
4.39%
🤔
9
0.356%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 163 of the 163 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,793 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 163 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🥇 مسابقه «نبض بازار» شروع شد!
این بار یک سؤال از تحلیل «نبض بازار» روز جمعه ۲۸ آگوست در ارانته پالس انتخاب شده است.
⭕️ برای شرکت در مسابقه:
🔹وارد پست مسابقه در اینستاگرام شوید و آن را لایک کنید.
🔹زیر همان پست مسابقه در اینستاگرام کامنت بگذارید تا سؤال مسابقه و لینک تحلیل برایتان ارسال شود.
🔹تحلیل «نبض بازار» را در ارانته پالس مطالعه کنید.
📱 پاسخ خود را از طریق دایرکت اینستاگرام ارانته ارسال کنید.
⌛ مهلت شرکت: …
⚡️نقره امروز یک نمونه خوب برای درک ساختار رِنج به ما میدهد.
⭕️ رِنج فقط حرکت خنثی نیست؛ یک ابزار اندازهگیری است
🔗 درس زنده بازار: -لینک-
⭕️ برای یادگیری در دل بازار واقعی به ارانته پالس بپیوندید، تحلیل را ببینید و دیدگاه خود را با دیگر معاملهگران به اشتراک بگذارید.
📱ساپورت فارسی ارانته:
@errante_persian_support1
___
💎 کارگزاری ارانته
@Errante_Brokerage
⭕️ پرواز CAD/CHF؛ سقف هفتگی در آستانه انفجار صعودی!
🔹 پرواز به شرط شکست مقاومت:
جفتارز بالاتر از حمایت 0.5808 گارد صعودی دارد؛ تثبیت بالای 0.5823 اهداف 0.5834 و 0.5848 را فعال میکند.
🔹 شتابگیری مومنتوم تکنیکال:
مثبت شدن اسیلاتور PPO و باز شدن باندهای بولینگر نشان میدهد قدرت خریداران برای شکست سقف در حال تزریق است.
🔹سوخت فاندامنتال از تورنتو:
اولین مازاد حساب جاری کانادا و نرخ بهره صفر سوئیس، منتظر تاییدیه نه…
⭕️ طلا در برزخ جکسون هول؛ استراحت موقت یا سقوط بزرگ؟
🔹 سقوط به شرط شکست حمایت:
طلا زیر مرز ۴,۶۰۵ دلار اصلاحی است؛ تثبیت زیر ۴,۵۴۹ دلار راه را برای اهداف ۴,۵۰۳ و ۴,۴۵۸ دلار باز میکند.
🔹 نجات بلندمدت با میانگین ۲۰۰:
با وجود ضعفِ موقت اسیلاتور PPO، ساختار اصلی بازار بالای میانگین صعودی ۴,۳۷۴ دلار همچنان خریدار است.
🔹حکم نهایی با سخنرانی وارش:
لحن سختگیرانه با افزایش بازدهی واقعی اوراق طلا را مهار میکند، اما داده ض…
⭕️ شوک جکسون هول؛ وارش ترمز بازار را میکشد؟
امروز سخنرانی وارش جهت بعدی بازار را مشخص میکند. خلاصه ماجرا:
🔹 تله نرخ بهره در دسامبر:
شانس کم افزایش نرخ در سپتامبر فریبنده است؛ تورم ۳.۳٪ جاده را برای جهش دلار در دسامبر باز نگه میدارد.
🔹فشار پنهان اوراق بر بورس:
صعود بازدهی اوراق بدون تغییر رسمی نرخها، هزینه وامها را بالا برده و سهام فناوری را قفل کرده است.
🔹آرامش شکننده نفت و طلا:
ریزش طلا و ثبات نفت روی ۸…
قبل از اولین معامله، نبض بازار را بگیر!
هر روز در «نبض بازار»:
🔥 محرکهای اصلی امروز 💗👀 واچلیست روز
⭕️ امروز فدرال رزرو باید داستانش را توضیح بدهد
🔗 نبض بازار صبح جمعه: -لینک-
📱 ساپورت فارسی ارانته:
@errante_persian_support1
___
💎 کارگزاری ارانته
@Errante_Brokerage
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🚨 بمب ساعتی جکسونهول؛ طوفان در راه بازار!
🗓 جمعه این هفته، مسیر بعدی دلار، طلا و سهام مشخص میشود:
1️⃣ سناریو اول (جهش دلار و بازدهی اوراق): تمرکز سخنرانی بر روی خطر تورم و بالا ماندن نرخها.
2️⃣ سناریو دوم (سقوط دلار و پرواز طلا): اولویت یافتن نگرانی از ضعف بازار کار و کاهش نرخها.
🔹 محرکهای موازی: تحولات ژئوپلیتیک و دادههای اشتغال، تورم و GDP قطعاً نوسانات را به اوج میرسانند.
🔗 مشروح نقشه کلان بازار در…
⭕️ ۲ استراتژی عملی برای معامله طلا
چگونه واکنش طلا به اخبار را تحلیل کنیم؟
همیشه نتیجه مثبت یا منفی یک داده بهمعنای حرکت قطعی بازار نیست. در این آموزش بررسی میکنیم چگونه نتیجه واقعی را با انتظارات بازار مقایسه کنید، واکنش قیمت بعد از انتشار خبر را تحلیل کنید و از ورودهای هیجانی در زمان نوسانات شدید دور بمانید.
در پست های یوتیوب ذیل استراتژی های ترید طلا را دریافت بفرمایید و همچنین با عضویت در یوتیوب ارانته آموزش …
⭕️ نفت زیر سایه مقاومت ۸۲.۵۵ دلاری؛ آتشبس در هرمز یا سقوط قیمت؟
نفت WTI پشت مقاومت ۸۲.۵۵ دلار قفل شده و کاهش نوسانات در کنار سیگنالهای تنگه هرمز، بازار را در آستانه یک شکست بزرگ قرار داده است. برای مشاهده سناریوهای صعود و سقوط، تحلیل را مطالعه کنید.
🔹 ادامه تحلیل را در ارانته پالس دریافت بفرمایید: -لینک-
📱ساپورت فارسی ارانته:
@errante_persian_support1
___
💎 کارگزاری ارانته
@Errante_Brokerage
⭕️ از رالی صعودی انویدیا تا کمین سیاست پولی در جکسون هول
گزارش قدرتمند انویدیا بر ترس از نرخهای بهره بالا غلبه کرد، اما تورم سرسخت و انتظار برای سیگنالهای جکسون هول، بازارها را در یک آزمون دوگانه میان رشد سودآوری و سیاست پولی قرار داده است.
🔹بررسی سمپوزیوم جکسون هول در تحلیل جامع
🔗 تحلیل جامع بازار | تاریخ 26 اوت 2026 در ارانته پالس: -لینک-
#تحلیل_روزانه
___
📱ساپورت فارسی ارانته:
@errante_persian_support1
__…
❤8🔥4👌2👍1
Signed Errante Persian Support
Showing the 12 most recent of 163 posts we hold for @Errante_Brokerage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Errante_Brokerage edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
افزایش قیمت نفت و بالا ماندن بازده اوراق آمریکا همچنان از دلار حمایت میکند64%
کاهش انتظارات فدرال رزرو همیشه باید USDJPY را پایین بیاورد10%
جفت ارز USDJPY ارتباطی با بازده اوراق و جریانهای تجاری ندارد16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 163 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
پشتیبانی فارسی آلپاری @alparipersiansupport · 31,844 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
فراچارتیست | کتابخانه بورس و فارکس @farachartist · 31,332 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 6 September 2026
AMarkets - Trading Ideas @AMarkets_en · 28,921 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بروکر فارکس ارانته | Errante” (@Errante_Brokerage), 8,900 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Errante_Brokerage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.