Channel
@Eric_Bolling
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,205subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001374620994 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Eric_Bolling |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Eric_Bolling |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 2,205 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 2,206 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:51 | 2,209 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 2,210 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 2,210 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
And just like that Wagner halts their move on Moscow and returns to their bases. This is smelling like some sort of staged event. Too early to tell but this seems odd on many levels. 2/ Subscribe: @Eric_Bolling
Russia/Wagner conflict: could be 1) straight up coup attempt 2) false flag -Putin set it up and will show his strength crushing it 3) A paid and planned event made to look like a coup but is nothing more than a choreographed show. 4) Wagner could be backed by US or NATO 1/ Subscribe: @Eric_Bolling
You all are amazing! Thanks for watching tonight and for all your comments/thoughts/ideas/suggestions. The show is growing so fast because of you 🫵. Have a great night, see you tomorrow night on “The Balance”. ETB Subscribe: @Eric_Bolling
🚨🚨Just In: Tuesdays numbers: •LAST NIGHT, NEWSMAX DELIVERED THE HIGHEST 8-9PM w/ P2+ (000) IN OUR HISTORY (rated by Nielsen). Thank you for making the “The Balance” one of America’s most important News shows. That’s all you friends! ♥️🫵 Subscribe: @Eric_Bolling
Look who’s back after a long hiatus.. my long lost office pal “Greg Kelly” @ gregkellyusa Subscribe: @Eric_Bolling
https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-woke-pride-lgbtq-boycott-1804912 Subscribe: @Eric_Bolling
Ok Karen.. I mean New Yorkers.. smoke. Got it. Subscribe: @Eric_Bolling
For all those who need a refresher course in #CommonSense during “PRIDE Month”.. here’s @ megynkelly with some next level straight talk right here. (Pun intended)… https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/a-great-day-on-the-megyn-kelly-show/ Subscribe: @Eric_Bolling
For all those who need a refresher course in #CommonSense .. here is @ megynkelly with some PhD. level coursework. https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/a-great-day-on-the-megyn-kelly-show/ Subscribe: @Eric_Bolling
Good time to poll you again… #3 Who do you think will be the GOP nominee? Subscribe: @Eric_Bolling
🚨JUST IN: https://nypost.com/2023/06/01/cnn-ratings-crater-in-may-despite-bump-from-trump-town-hall/ Subscribe: @Eric_Bolling
Last night on “The Balance”: @ NEWSMAX @ RonDeSantis @ CaseyDeSantis @ Riley_Gaines_ https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/courage-strength-optimism/campaigns/riley-gaines-endorses-ron-desantis-for-president Subscribe: @Eric_Bolling
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Eric_Bolling. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,214,317 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Eric Bolling” (@Eric_Bolling), 2,205 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Eric_Bolling.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.