Jin ka 50% bana wo bi enjoy Jinho na tp tak hold Kia wo bi enjoy karo g π
β€24π₯8

Channel
@EliteClassTrading
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
40,077subscribers
+42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001926661981 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EliteClassTrading |
| Description | https://telegra.ph/Risk-Disclaimer---Please-Read-Before-You-Trade-06-15 β οΈ Educational Content Only. Not Financial Advice & Not Responsible of Any Outcomes.Trading Carries Risk 18+. Support: @earnwithrashid @earnwithrashidmanager @teamearnwithrashid |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EliteClassTrading |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 40,077 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:21 | 40,087 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 40,099 | +30 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 40,069 | +38 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 40,031 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 40,035 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (31 July 2026 β 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 260,704 |
| Reactions total | 3,602 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
3,602 reactions across 32 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 2,890 | 80.2% | |
| π₯ | 289 | 8.02% | |
| π | 193 | 5.36% | |
| π± | 75 | 2.08% | |
| π₯° | 60 | 1.67% | |
| π | 36 | 0.999% | |
| π€© | 13 | 0.361% | |
| π³ | 12 | 0.333% | |
| π€ | 12 | 0.333% | |
| π | 9 | 0.25% | |
| β | 6 | 0.167% | |
| π | 6 | 0.167% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 1 | 0.028% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 3,602reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Jin ka 50% bana wo bi enjoy Jinho na tp tak hold Kia wo bi enjoy karo g π
β€24π₯8
Opps π
β€28π₯5π2π€2π₯°1
Sticker, posted without a caption
β€22π₯5π₯°3
Ayeee hyyy π Chas aye na level ki trade enjoy π Sl entry close 50% Or ya ap sirf sl entry ka sat full tp tak bi hold kr sakta ha its up to you
β€50
1:1 simple Only for risk takers
β€28
Setup BTW usdt Bullish Sl 0.23464 Tp 0.25980 Exchange weex DYOR NFA
β€43π4
Sl hit after a long time streak break ho gaye but koi nah jaha 5000% banaya waha 200% tak agr market ko chala Jaya no issue krta ha recovery with boom profit
β€129π25π³12π±12π€3
Poll
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
β€103π15π6π6π₯6
Weβve been consistently taking trades on Bitcoin in our crypto group, and Alhamdulillah, weβve been making some really big profits. Weβve achieved 1,000%, 500%, and 300%+ profits, with 300%β1,000% being the minimum TP range in many of our trades. π₯ Now I want your suggestion: Should we also start taking trades on meme coins, or should we continue focusing only on Bitcoin? What do you guys prefer β Bitcoin only or Bβ¦
β€86π9π₯6π4π3
64400 sl
β€57π7π±3π2π1
Voice message, posted without a caption
β€61π7π₯3π2β€βπ₯1
PAIR: BTC USDT BIAS: long π’π’ My Entry Zone: market price Targets: will updated soon Risk: 0.2%-0.3% per trade Leverage: Use low / controlled My Reason: Bullish structure + rejection from demand Educational purpose only. Not financial advice.
β€61π6π±5β2π€©2
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @EliteClassTrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Poll
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank β 34,419 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βElite Class Trading by (EarnwithRashid) π₯βπ»β (@EliteClassTrading), 40,077 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EliteClassTrading.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.