Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 66 days, net +54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,900–2,976 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 16:46
2,967
+10
6 Oct 2026, 09:59
2,957
+7
29 Sept 2026, 11:36
2,950
+15
18 Sept 2026, 23:41
2,935
+12
14 Sept 2026, 13:40
2,923
-1
10 Sept 2026, 19:59
2,924
-12
5 Sept 2026, 12:18
2,936
-3
1 Sept 2026, 19:19
2,939
-8
29 Aug 2026, 19:38
2,947
+7
26 Aug 2026, 16:22
2,940
+31
23 Aug 2026, 18:26
2,909
-3
20 Aug 2026, 06:45
2,912
-6
17 Aug 2026, 11:56
2,918
+7
13 Aug 2026, 14:18
2,911
-3
10 Aug 2026, 16:31
2,914
+2
7 Aug 2026, 22:31
2,912
-1
7 Aug 2026, 13:47
2,913
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 50s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
331 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
148
44.7%
❤
92
27.8%
👍
49
14.8%
😁
15
4.53%
🤣
14
4.23%
👌
5
1.51%
👏
3
0.906%
🤔
3
0.906%
👨💻
1
0.302%
💯
1
0.302%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤯🤯🤯
Ryanair flight, en route from Greece to Germany. At approximately FL200 (19,700 feet), the cabin window adjacent to a 60-year-old male passenger sustained a structural failure / cracked shortly after departure. The resulting cabin pressure differential caused the passenger to become partially trapped/sucked into the broken aperture. Fellow passengers intervened, physically restrained him, and pulled him back int…
Но помните про то, что все мясо всегда в комментах!
Вообще 80% всего самого лучшего что вы можете найти в плане изучения английского — комменты
Там общаются просто люди
«Пишут я в полете сменил кеды, но это боты»
Поэтому читайте комменты, друзья! И оставляйте их здесь ✌️❤️
OVERWHELMED
Tell me about a time when you felt overwhelmed by what you were facing on the flight deck
Почему важен контекст?
Если просто вобьете слово
В какой-нибудь Яндекс переводчик, он выдаст:
overwhelmed — ошеломленный (удивленный) пс так тоже можно
Расскажи про случай когда ты был ошеломлен в кабине? (Увидел НЛО)
Странно, так вот: проверяйте либо через ИИ в контексте (но лучше Cambridge dictionary посмотрит…
TOP GUN idiom 🚘
✔️ To fly by the seat of one’s pants
Meaning:
действовать интуитивно, без приборов, по обстановке, полагаясь на опыт и чутьё
Обычно используется, когда пилот вынужден действовать нестандартно из-за отказа оборудования, сложных метеоусловий или непредвиденной ситуации, где нет чётких инструкций.
Example:
When the crew lost all airspeed indications on final approach, they flew by the seat of thei…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @EPTAEnglish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EPTA (English Private Telegram about Aviation)” (@EPTAEnglish), 2,967 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EPTAEnglish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.