Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 65 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,108–1,127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Oct 2026, 08:40
1,110
-2
5 Oct 2026, 06:40
1,112
-4
27 Sept 2026, 00:22
1,116
-1
11 Sept 2026, 18:58
1,117
-1
6 Sept 2026, 21:41
1,118
+1
2 Sept 2026, 07:07
1,117
-1
27 Aug 2026, 06:44
1,118
-1
23 Aug 2026, 22:35
1,119
-2
20 Aug 2026, 06:24
1,121
-2
16 Aug 2026, 20:44
1,123
-2
13 Aug 2026, 03:33
1,125
+2
10 Aug 2026, 09:20
1,123
+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:01
1,122
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:36
1,122
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 26 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
51 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
29
56.9%
👍
8
15.7%
😍
7
13.7%
🔥
6
11.8%
😱
1
1.96%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2024 to 21 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‼️В связи с возможными блокировками в месенджерах, создали также чат в MAX‼️
Присоединяйся к чату Бьюти Бит в MAX
https://max.ru/join/2w50w9zV9rSNbJ4YigVLLdpjH0YKEifpnhA-Biw2v44
Присоединяйся к КАНАЛУ в МАХ по ссылке: https://max.ru/join/4ipSG9OrHanF3BO9wkDihRwaIUigLm8kzFfdJ5coby4
Перманентный макияж - это неестественно?
Пожалуй, это один из самых главных мифов ✨ Так как зачастую мы видим фотографии сразу после процедуры, а не по заживлению, нам кажется что это ярко, заметно, насыщенно. Но на самом деле результат может быть настолько естественным и деликатным, что никто не догадается что вы делали перманент.
Линейка Cosmos предназначена для создания натуральных, естественных работ 🤍
На перв…
Еще один шикарный микс , когда-то хочется четкую форму и естественный цвет
Beauty Bit Базовое неглиже 60 %+ Ягодный морс 40 %
Работа выполнена в рамках обучающего курса @lanagonta
Сказать, что мы восхищены вашими работами на наших пигментах - ничего не сказать!
Мы очень рады, что пигменты СOSMOS и BEAUTY BIT завоевали любовь такого количества талантов 😍.
В подборке потрясающие работы
Жанны Андрейчук
andreychuk.pm
Новокузнецк
+79030692336
Проверь есть ли у тебя эти мысли⬇️
...тренинги прохожу, но постоянно откатываю...
...задолбала эта идеальная жизнь на картинках, почему моя реальность скучная как 50 оттенков серого...
...все знают как одеваться, есть, думать, отсеивать нарциссов, абьюзеров, получать подарки, и все знаю, но не делаю ни..уя...
...вкалываю на работе, благодарности ноль...
...не нравлюсь себе в зеркале...
...чувствую себя мартышкой вып…
💙💙💙💙💙💙🚀
«Здравствуйте 😊
Я как стала работать самостоятельно, с мая 2023 года, так и работаю только Бьюти Бит на всех зонах. Очень нравятся бровные пигменты, заживают отлично и действительно коричневым, а не серостью 👍
Губные пигменты тоже очень нравятся, особенно Базовое неглиже и Розовый бисквит, это прям ходовые цвета.
В целом очень довольна пигментами и продукцией, от пенки тоже в восторге ☺️»
Елена Воропаева
…
❤1
Signed Евгения Сорокина
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @EGProduct. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“COSMOS/Beauty Bit - КАНАЛ (Официальный)” (@EGProduct), 1,110 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EGProduct.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.