Video, posted without a caption

Channel
晚棠的大宝贝👅
@Duskapple
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,552subscribers
+98 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002918825065 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Duskapple |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Duskapple |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 1,552 | +12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 1,540 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 1,535 | +36 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 1,499 | +25 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 1,474 | +20 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 1,454 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 37.6%
- avg views ÷ 1,552 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 584
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (15 May 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,090 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 04s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
【老师艺名】:#晚棠 【验证留名】:林夕爱普生 【验证时间】:8.14 【修车水费】:1500pp 【服务内容】:舌吻跟69都有 【颜值身材】:身材挺好又嫩 【凶器罩杯】:C 【体验细节】:妹妹是我见过最敏感反应最大的妹妹,而且下面特别紧,跟处女的差距也不大了,只是简单的插入妹妹就开始受不了了,叫声很骚很浪,忍不住开始抽动后,肉眼可见妹妹的皮肤开始泛红,下面也开始有明显的水声,做爱反馈真实,不像那些哦哦哦死猪一样,非常开心舒服的体验,下次还会返的。喜欢嫩妹的强烈推荐。 【事逼行为】:无 【优点缺点】:嫩妹,配合度高 【联系方式】:@Nachtang
你喜欢的样子我都有反差,还是清纯
【老师艺名】:#晚棠 【验证留名】:迅猛龙 【验证时间】:8-10 【修车水费】:800一课 【服务内容】:课表一致 【颜值身材】:人照9.5成以上 【凶器罩杯】:C 【体验细节】:老师人很好 亲自下来接的,坐下聊了两句,把晚棠老师拥入怀中小女友的感觉,和老师一起洗了个澡,老师帮我擦干,先再换上性感的小丝袜等着呢,到床上开始服务手指在我身上滑动间好柔好软好舒服,口活好六九舌吻均可各种姿势配合女上位节奏感非常好,换侧位换后入感觉强烈,不错,下次继续干 【事逼行为】:无 【优点缺点】:身材棒,颜值高 【联系方式】:@Nachtang
努力向着一切美好的事物靠拢
【老师艺名】:#晚棠 【验证留名】:小花洒亅 【验证时间】:2026.8.10 【修车水费】:1500PP 【服务内容】:课表一致 【颜值身材】:纯纯嫩 【凶器罩杯】:C杯 【体验细节】:晚棠服务态度非常好、进门给鞋子换然后给水让休息一下抽根烟聊一下、然后准备一下洗澡、非常有耐心帮洗澡还有水中萧非常到位!洗的非常干净随后就进去正事了、69啊制服啊反正该有的都有、来到就是赚到、但是我不希望你们来,不要暴力开车,把人吓跑啊,哈哈哈哈!一次完事给擦干净聊会天随后换身制服接着开干、两人都非常投入、满意的出击!👍 【事逼行为】:性感 【优点缺点】:迷人 【联系方式】:@Nachtang
好久没有陪你一起出来逛街吃饭啦😋我的好闺蜜,你们的晚棠回来啦,之前做过一段时间,后来因为某些原因没时间,现在还是以前一样哦
愿所有的美好都恰逢其时~
即将解放。
读技校不一定有用,不读肯定没用,但是我还是读不进去。
被我遗忘的爱心丝袜,今天穿出来还挺好看,有很多哦。
🌸艺名:晚棠(在校生兼职) 🌸年龄:19碎 🌸身高:167cm 🌸体重:46kg 🌸胸围:C(无科技) 🌈课表与约课流程 800P 45min⏰ 1500PP 90min⏰ 2000下午茶 2小时⏰(不限次) 2600夜 9小时⏰(不限次) 外出报销车费 太远加米 服雾:鸳鸯🛀🏻,🌬箫,🐍纹(口臭的不行),🈚️套口,👙丝袜,岸磨,💅🏻指滑,蚂蚁上树,激情爱爱,老汉推🚗,观音座🪷,各种姿势配合~ 特点:听话,温柔,女友感,富雾好 自带课室🏠(一次性浴巾等用品) 🈲:摘🍑 醉酒 后花园 暴力 勿扰。 注:(可以微信跟支付宝) 课表上没有写的,尽量满足哟,宝宝们素质约,会努力保证每位宝宝的体验喔 不议价🌸 不口嗨🌸 不闲聊🌸
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Duskapple. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 470,019 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“晚棠的大宝贝👅” (@Duskapple), 1,552 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Duskapple.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.