Engagement
3 posts held, back to 24 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
20 Oct 2025, 04:47 UTC≈40,900 viewsread 7 August 2026 Dupay 停止服务公告
尊敬的 Dupay 用户:
自上线以来,Dupay 一直致力于为广大用户提供便捷、安全的支付与卡片服务。遗憾的是,受多方面合规及上游供应商问题影响,仍无法从根本上解决相关合规及资金流通障碍。我们曾更换 6 家上游卡片供应商,但仍存在严重的运营限制,其中包括一笔被冻结的大额资金至今尚未解冻。
基于上述原因,我们经过慎重考虑做出停止服务的决定。Dupay 将于 2025 年 11 月 30 日正式停止全部服务并关闭服务器。
即便如此,我们依然坚持一件事——保护用户资金安全。
Dupay已垫付了被冻结的资金,确保每一位用户都可以全额提现。请尚未完成提现的用户,于服务器关闭前尽快提现。
如您在关闭日期之后仍未完成提现,可通过以下方式进行人工处理:
请发送邮件至 [email protected]
,请在邮件中附上您的身份认证证件,我们会协助您完成资金提取。
衷心感谢各位用户长期以来的信任与支持。
…
Signed Dupay大管家(不会主动私聊你🙅♂️)
Dupay官方频道 pinned Deleted message
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @Dupay_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,090,464 of 1,623,166entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dupay官方频道” (@Dupay_official), 1,403 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dupay_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.