Channel
@DrZj521
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,016subscribers
+1,976 since we began measuring on 29 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004434613499 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrZj521 |
| Created | 28 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 29 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrZj521 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 07:39 | 2,016 | +1,976 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 40 | first reading |
3 posts held, back to 28 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3 (28 September 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 188 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 00:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
支机1u 机主1u 最高出单率不墨迹 文全/补齐/猎魔 12/10/10 你有量我有优惠 破解微信实名25u 你放心发单 我保你满意 破解人脸5-15u 你有价我有质量 名下支付宝30u 区别市面垃圾二要素破解 无遗漏 读了就秒 破解名下银行卡15u 有多少出多少 45广西1u秒 32江苏1u秒 46海南1u秒 43湖南1u秒 12天津1u秒 13河北1u秒 42湖北2u秒 36江西3u秒 37山东3u秒 52贵州3u秒 62甘肃3u秒 41河南3u秒 14山西3u秒 34安微4u秒 33浙江4u秒 安微单地址1u秒 重庆单地址1u秒 北京单地址1u秒 广东单地址2u秒 福建户籍地2u秒 浙江单地址2u秒 地区个户 广西房产 内蒙古房产 江苏房产 河南房产 海南房产 云南房产 安徽房产 陕西房产 甘肃房产 新疆房产 湖南房产 西藏房产 山东房产 天津房产…
满50人发第一个红包
🤣1
Channel created
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @DrZj521. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr源头业务频道” (@DrZj521), 2,016 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrZj521.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.