Channel
@DigitalAlchemistBlockchain
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry
14,501subscribers
-1,374 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002544141176 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DigitalAlchemistBlockchain |
| Description | Where charts become formulas and volatility turns into gold. Crypto markets, trading signals, on-chain insights, and precision-crafted setups from the digital laboratory. Decoding chaos. Transmuting data into edge. Owner: @alchemist_blockchain |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DigitalAlchemistBlockchain |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @oracleblockchain1/10035 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC | @DigitalAlchemistBlockchain/946 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @oracleblockchain1/10045 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC | @DigitalAlchemistBlockchain/947 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @oracleblockchain1/10055 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC | @DigitalAlchemistBlockchain/948 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @oracleblockchain1/10116 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC | @DigitalAlchemistBlockchain/955 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @oracleblockchain1/10127 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTC | @DigitalAlchemistBlockchain/957 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @oracleblockchain1/10187 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC | @DigitalAlchemistBlockchain/963 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @oracleblockchain1 | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @oracleblockchain1 (8–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @oracleblockchain1. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 14,501 | -870 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 15,371 | -30 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 15,401 | -382 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 15,783 | -87 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:41 | 15,870 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 15,875 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 45,870 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
💴 You opened a position and immediately went negative. Why? — Entry fee. Let's calculate. Deposit $1,000, leverage 10x, position $10,000. Taker fee on entry: $5. Fee on exit: another $5. Spread you crossed with a market order: $1. Slippage on execution: $2. Funding if you hold the position for a day: $3. Total $16 for one trade. That's 1.6% of the deposit burned before the market made a single move. ✍️ Now multi…
💎 Ahead of us is a week rich in trading; at its end, we will draw conclusions. How is your mood, colleagues?
💴 $ZEC has been consolidating for a long time within an uptrend. On the daily timeframe, the EMAs are giving a bullish signal; holding at the 0.618 level will be the primary signal to enter a long position. ✍️ Trade details Market entry: $500 Stop-loss: $381 Leverage: up to 3x Target: $761 Risk: 1% My position size: $55,000
⚡️ Continuing work with $PUMP! The asset demonstrates confident growth and a strong bullish signal of intersecting EMAs on the daily timeframe. I consider the scenario medium-term, recommended leverage: 3x. ✍️ Trade data Market entry: $0.001615 Stop-loss: $0.001515 Leverage: up to 3x Target: $0.001845 Risk: 1% My position size: $40 000
💴 Strategy is selling bitcoin for the fourth week in a row! From August 3 to 9, Michael Saylor’s company sold 1,690 BTC for $108.6 million at an average price of $64,262. The average purchase price of the entire reserve sits at $75,385. That means they’re selling BELOW their own cost basis. ✍️ Every last cent went toward buying back 1,152,020 shares of STRC. This is the third buyback under the $1 billion program. …
⚡️ A new weekly recap. Looking at what happened over the past week, which trades brought what, and collecting all the useful and practical materials from the last seven days in one place. 💴 Trades August 2 $BEAT is a trade that did not make it into any recent weekly chart, so it goes into this one. +$52,045 in profit August 5 $UB scenario exposure updated August 6 $PI fought hard but failed at its targets and co…
⚡️ $BEAT on your screens. The asset demonstrated a local correction on the daily timeframe, while the price is holding above the EMA100. Bullish growth potential is maintained. The stop in this case is longer than usual; I strongly recommend NOT using leverage above 2x. ✍️ Trade Data Entry: $2.4 Stop-loss: $1.6 Leverage: up to 2x Target: $4.27 Risk: 1% My position size: $80,000
✍️ $CRO did not receive adequate support. The asset also did not recover to the entry level for the position. 📊 There was a retest from EMA21, which barely reached the 0.236 Fibonacci level. I do not consider it expedient to expect a recovery, so I am abandoning the scenario. Exiting without losses and without profits.
🔥 I love Sundays. I usually try to take at least one day off a week, but today there is too much planned to sit around. Went to a spa, jogged 5 km, and met up with colleagues for a brainstorm. We discussed some interesting corporate ideas and where the market is heading. I cannot say more yet, so I hope you understand. 🧑🔬 This is my way of pulling back the curtain a little and letting you into my routine and my l…
⚡️ BTC has failed to close above the 50-day EMA for the third week in a row. The price is around $65,075, the range is narrowing, daily candles are shorter, and volumes are dropping. This is volatility compression. The 50-day EMA acts as a boundary between the short-term and medium-term trend. As long as the price is below it, algorithms read the structure as downtrending, and every approach to the line meets selle…
⚡️ Continuing to work with $ADA The asset is also moving in an uptrend and showed the expected local pullback to EMA21. This will be our entry opportunity! ✍️ Trade data Market entry: $0.1968 Stop-loss: $0.189 Leverage: up to 8x Target: $0.2192 Risk: 1% My position size: $60 000
💴 Save this post! It collects the most current and practical strategies for what to do in crypto right now, specifically for YOU. ✍️ Enjoy the read, ladies and gentlemen.
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @DigitalAlchemistBlockchain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Digital Alchemist: Gold from Code” (@DigitalAlchemistBlockchain), 14,501 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DigitalAlchemistBlockchain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.