Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 光之国【反馈榜】

Channel

光之国【反馈榜】

@DiJiaoooo7

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

9,802subscribers

+2,293 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004437305356
TypeChannel
Username@DiJiaoooo7
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 28 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded25 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DiJiaoooo7

Growth

7,5099,8028,655.525 August 2026 — 7,509 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,509 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,575 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,565 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,802 subscribers25 August 20261 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2,293. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,165–10,146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 20:469,802+237
29 Aug 2026, 17:589,565+1,990
26 Aug 2026, 13:447,575+66
25 Aug 2026, 23:157,509no change
25 Aug 2026, 23:007,509first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 9,802 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,200
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.112%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held36 (28 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total38,388
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 21 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3792.5%
😁25.00%
🔥12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC53 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#投稿 🌍光之国反馈报告 🌍出击英雄TG:@wk 🌍拯救老师TG:@xinjiangbbb 🌍位置: 官渡 🌍ls课表相似度:中 🌍体验项目: 一次 🌍ls优点:很会叫床,很配合,态度还可以,长相中等不丑,挺嫩的 🌍ls缺点:不让揉奶头,略微有效被迫营业的感觉 🌍PS补充说明:综合来说值回票价 🌍是否推荐:推荐 📨 投稿机器:@DiJiaTouGaobot ⚠️ 投稿须知(请认真阅读): 1️⃣ 投稿需 上传出击证明(约课记录) 与 出击照片(须经老师同意后拍摄)。 2️⃣ 所有投稿将由人工审核上传,请务必真实、客观。 如发现 伪造车评或虚假反馈,一经核实,投稿人及相关老师将被移除处理。 光之国:https://t.me/DiJaoooo7 📸福利:https://t.me/DiDiDij9 【复制模版投稿 如不则审核不通过】,🌍光之国反馈报告 🌍出击英雄TG:@wk 🌍拯救老师TG:@xinjian

28 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTC74 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#投稿 🌍光之国反馈报告 🌍出击英雄TG:(你的TG号) 🌍拯救老师TG:@pangpanggd 🌍位置: #区 🌍ls课表相似度:(高 / 中 /低)低 🌍体验项目: (一次 / 两次 /✌️)1 🌍ls优点:拉完了 🌍ls缺点:黑的一比,全身都黑像没洗干净,臭臭的,比也有异味臭,胖的一比。肚子赘肉。态度绝了。直接死鱼头发挡脸,不说话,说不好意思。那你出来做个屁,全程死鱼安静,情绪价值全无,甚至不如街边站街的,口也草草结束,做也敷衍着急,一副不耐烦的样子,严重怀疑好评自己刷的,好评的兄弟真不知道是如何出击的,反正感受下来极其恶劣,出击过差的,从来没差评过,但是没见过这么差的,绝了,后面让舔也不舔,话也不说,问怎么了,一副要死了的感觉,你要是说不舒服心情不好,不想做了我也不说啥,把人骗来,就不管了,态度全无,累了?不想做?就直接停课,要做就好好做,要是真的好好说人来了做了一会你说累不想做了,也理解,辛苦费我照旧给,

28 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC69 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#投稿 🌍光之国反馈报告 🌍出击英雄TG:@qaz624190 🌍拯救老师TG:@Yaaaaalisa 🌍位置: 北市区 🌍ls课表相似度:课表上有的都有好吧,对我这个哥布林也很认真好吧 🌍体验项目:PP 🌍ls优点:第一次跑这么远找老师,还是有点心慌慌的。进了房间看了老师,一切心慌的都没有好吧,身材前凸后翘的,满足了我丰乳肥臀的愿望。丝毫没有玩的不开心的好吧。小制服带了好多,看的我眼花缭乱的。道具也带了有。真是巨满足。我感觉无法用语言来说明了。服务态度 身材好吧。满足了我对性爱的所有想法。 🌍ls缺点:暂时没有教室,小妹的化妆技术还不是很熟练。其他没啥 🌍PS补充说明:听说有人说老师看人下菜 丝毫没感觉好吧 🌍是否推荐:强烈推荐 📨 投稿机器:@DiJiaTouGaobot ⚠️ 投稿须知(请认真阅读): 1️⃣ 投稿需 上传出击证明(约课记录) 与 出击照片(须经老师同意后拍摄)。 2️⃣ 所有投稿将由

28 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC794 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#投稿 #投稿 🌍光之国反馈报告 🌍出击英雄TG:@zh1wu 🌍拯救老师TG:@xinjiangbbb 🌍位置: 官渡区 🌍ls课表相似度:高 🌍体验项目: 半价 🌍ls优点:老师165-170之间,圆脸,身材比例不错,小🐍,日感好紧且水多,叫的很骚反馈足,有时候声音大到感觉隔壁都能听见 🌍ls缺点:人照有一点不一样 🌍PS补充说明: 🌍是否推荐:是 📨 投稿机器:@DiJiaTouGaobot ⚠️ 投稿须知(请认真阅读): 1️⃣ 投稿需 上传出击证明(约课记录) 与 出击照片(须经老师同意后拍摄)。 2️⃣ 所有投稿将由人工审核上传,请务必真实、客观。 如发现 伪造车评或虚假反馈,一经核实,投稿人及相关老师将被移除处理。 光之国:https://t.me/DiJaoooo7 📸福利:https://t.me/DiDiDij9 【复制模版投稿 如不则审核不通过】 from GodaRyuji f

28 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC778 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#投稿 🌍光之国反馈报告 🌍出击英雄TG:荡 鸭(你的TG号) 🌍拯救老师TG:@hhfbnnb(老师TG号) 🌍位置: #官渡区 🌍ls课表相似度:(高 / 中 /低)高 🌍体验项目: (一次 / 两次 /✌️)一次 🌍ls优点:童颜巨乳,人照合一 🌍ls缺点:口活不行,服务基本等于无,但是老师刚下海大家要宽容。 🌍PS补充说明:因为出击上一个老师给我造成的严重的心理阴影,导致一直🐍不出来,老师全程不催不闹,我桩了三四十分钟实在累不行了,最后还是老师手打出来的,昆明少见的童颜巨乳,同时人照合一,妈妈再也不担心我被照骗搞了。 🌍是否推荐:推荐 📨 投稿机器:@DiJiaTouGaobot ⚠️ 投稿须知(请认真阅读): 1️⃣ 投稿需 上传出击证明(约课记录) 与 出击照片(须经老师同意后拍摄)。 2️⃣ 所有投稿将由人工审核上传,请务必真实、客观。 如发现 伪造车评或虚假反馈,一经核实,投稿人及相关老师将

1

28 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC729 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#投稿 🌍光之国反馈报告 🌍出击英雄TG:荡 鸭(你的TG号) 🌍拯救老师TG:@qidougdbot(老师TG号) 🌍位置: #官渡区 🌍ls课表相似度:(高 / 中 /低)低 🌍体验项目: (一次 / 两次 /✌️)一次 🌍ls优点:天然白虎 🌍ls缺点:不会服务,环境差,做爱过程全程敷衍,我感觉我买个飞机杯效果会更好。 🌍PS补充说明:我明确表达了我是全价工兵(心疼这些老师所以不用券),开门进去以后就自己玩手机,卫生条件糟心,老师精神状态像是熬了几个通宵没睡觉,看着我都怕猝死,身材骨感没肉,屌感差。总之不推荐。 🌍是否推荐:不推荐 📨 投稿机器:@DiJiaTouGaobot ⚠️ 投稿须知(请认真阅读): 1️⃣ 投稿需 上传出击证明(约课记录) 与 出击照片(须经老师同意后拍摄)。 2️⃣ 所有投稿将由人工审核上传,请务必真实、客观。 如发现 伪造车评或虚假反馈,一经核实,投稿人及相关老师将被移除

1

28 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC719 views0 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#投稿 🌍光之国反馈报告 🌍出击英雄TG:(sony浦) 🌍拯救老师TG:(糯九儿) 🌍位置: #官渡区 🌍ls课表相似度:高 🌍体验项目: 一次 🌍ls优点:ls人照一致,🐻D丰挺饱满,bbw身材,服务态度和配合度极高,特别是后入,看着臀浪发射,好爽,还会回锅… 🌍ls缺点:ls被猫抓了打了疫苗,不能洗澡,只有自助澡 🌍PS补充说明:无 🌍是否推荐:是 📨 投稿机器:@DiJiaTouGaobot ⚠️ 投稿须知(请认真阅读): 1️⃣ 投稿需 上传出击证明(约课记录) 与 出击照片(须经老师同意后拍摄)。 2️⃣ 所有投稿将由人工审核上传,请务必真实、客观。 如发现 伪造车评或虚假反馈,一经核实,投稿人及相关老师将被移除处理。 光之国:https://t.me/DiJaoooo7 📸福利:https://t.me/DiDiDij9 【复制模版投稿 如不则审核不通过】 from 匿名

28 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC710 viewsread 28 August 2026

#投稿 killlll,@km520kmbot,五华区,高,一次,全是优点,应该没有,一句话形容:二八佳人体似酥 这一次 不用赶进度条 也不用赶雨停的时间 窗帘拉的密不透风 剩下的全用体温来确认 天亮之后各自转身 这一次的滚烫,足够暖往后的冷,推荐 from klllllll s

28 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC784 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#投稿 #投稿 🌍光之国反馈报告 🌍出击英雄TG:@xxzzytk 🌍拯救老师TG:@Yaaaaalisa 阿雅 🌍位置: 北市区 🌍ls课表相似度:高 🌍体验项目: 三小时 🌍ls优点:配合度更高 🌍ls缺点:脸上痘痘有点多 🌍PS补充说明:这个是一场长达3个小时战斗,提前一周约了老师,老师没有教室,让老师开了房间,提前告诉老师喜欢骚的,果然没让我失望,立马告知她见我不穿内裤了,让我好好发挥,这还了得。见面这天也是巧合,在楼道就见到了老师一条油亮的黑丝加上包臀裙,她走在前面,我一看知道是她,我立马上前打了招呼,内心想着你这个小骚逼,没穿内裤一会好好的干呢,开门以后,老师拿出了试纸结果,商家配送错了,我哪能忍得住,让她联系重新配送以后,我早已是蠢蠢欲动了,立马就从下身摸了起来,果真空空如也,下身立马就硬了起来,立马让老师穿上了我带的道具和衣服开始玩了起来,一条油亮的黑丝配送兔女郎的服装,手铐、脚铐、项圈也佩戴上了

1

28 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC947 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#投稿 🌍光之国反馈报告 🌍出击英雄TG:榴莲 🌍拯救老师TG:@xiaokekou910 🌍位置: 官渡区 🌍ls课表相似度:高 🌍体验项目: 两次 🌍ls优点:人照一致 小区环境很好房间干净老师也是人美声甜可可爱爱的屁股很有肉c的时候贼爽真是极品来的过程中不催不急 中途来例假了也坚持做完不扫兴 最后看我累了还拿水给我喝老师人真的很好 🌍ls缺点:无 🌍PS补充说明:老师是之前的猫教说是换号了 🌍是否推荐:推荐 📨 投稿机器:@DiJiaTouGaobot ⚠️ 投稿须知(请认真阅读): 1️⃣ 投稿需 上传出击证明(约课记录) 与 出击照片(须经老师同意后拍摄)。 2️⃣ 所有投稿将由人工审核上传,请务必真实、客观。 如发现 伪造车评或虚假反馈,一经核实,投稿人及相关老师将被移除处理。 光之国:https://t.me/DiJaoooo7 📸福利:https://t.me/DiDiDij9 【复制模版

27 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC≈1,260 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#投稿 🌍光之国反馈报告 🌍出击英雄TG:@zh1wu 🌍拯救老师TG:@plqdxm 🌍位置: 官渡区 🌍ls课表相似度:高 🌍体验项目: 一次 🌍ls优点:依旧女友感拉满,依旧超级大蟒蛇,依旧会回锅 🌍ls缺点:难约,开课少 🌍PS补充说明: 🌍是否推荐:推荐 📨 投稿机器:@DiJiaTouGaobot ⚠️ 投稿须知(请认真阅读): 1️⃣ 投稿需 上传出击证明(约课记录) 与 出击照片(须经老师同意后拍摄)。 2️⃣ 所有投稿将由人工审核上传,请务必真实、客观。 如发现 伪造车评或虚假反馈,一经核实,投稿人及相关老师将被移除处理。 光之国:https://t.me/DiJaoooo7 📸福利:https://t.me/DiDiDij9 【复制模版投稿 如不则审核不通过】 from GodaRyuji

1

27 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC≈1,660 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

#投稿 🌍光之国反馈报告 🌍出击英雄TG:书记 🌍拯救老师TG:520 🌍位置: 北市区 🌍ls课表相似度:高 🌍体验项目:二档 🌍ls优点:情绪价值极高,超可爱的骚母狗,自带玩具,配合度很高,声浪好听 🌍ls缺点:唯一的瑕疵:嘴吧因为牙齿有点地包天,但对我来说不算缺点,甚至有点可爱 🌍PS补充说明:站岗了半小时,想的上去就是两个大比斗摔脸上。进门第一眼这个妹妹咋那么可爱,然后妹妹不停给我道歉,直接给我磕了一个,尼玛这种咋个生气,随便打两下可爱脸就放过她了。接的呢就爽吃了一哈,大家温柔点,我还想去。 🌍是否推荐:力推,昆明能有这种妹子不容易啊 📨 投稿机器:@DiJiaTouGaobot ⚠️ 投稿须知(请认真阅读): 1️⃣ 投稿需 上传出击证明(约课记录) 与 出击照片(须经老师同意后拍摄)。 2️⃣ 所有投稿将由人工审核上传,请务必真实、客观。 如发现 伪造车评或虚假反馈,一经核实,投稿人及相关老师将

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @DiJiaoooo7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@DiJiaoooo7 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,060,606 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“光之国【反馈榜】” (@DiJiaoooo7), 9,802 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DiJiaoooo7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.