Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dexsport | Announcements

Channel

Dexsport | Announcements

@Dexsport_io

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

35,998subscribers

-263 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001483574751
TypeChannel
Username@Dexsport_io
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Dexsport_io

Growth

35,99836,26136,129.56 August 2026 — 36,261 subscribers6 August 2026 — 36,261 subscribers6 August 2026 — 36,247 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,211 subscribers9 August 2026 — 36,190 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36,157 subscribers11 August 2026 — 36,133 subscribers11 August 2026 — 36,114 subscribers12 August 2026 — 36,084 subscribers14 August 2026 — 36,061 subscribers15 August 2026 — 36,023 subscribers17 August 2026 — 36,010 subscribers18 August 2026 — 35,998 subscribers6 August 202618 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 12 days, net -263. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,959–36,300 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 06:4235,998-12
17 Aug 2026, 09:4936,010-13
15 Aug 2026, 14:3936,023-38
14 Aug 2026, 01:0536,061-23
12 Aug 2026, 20:2636,084-30
11 Aug 2026, 21:0236,114-19
11 Aug 2026, 00:1136,133-24
10 Aug 2026, 03:3036,157-33
9 Aug 2026, 03:5336,190-21
8 Aug 2026, 00:5836,211-36
6 Aug 2026, 22:5636,247-14
6 Aug 2026, 01:5036,261no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:3036,261first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.739%
avg views ÷ 35,998 subscribers
Avg views / post
266
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held22 (30 May 202613 August 2026)
Views total2,128
Reactions total59
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 02:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
44s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,876 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🎉33317.8%
🔥32917.5%
🤩31416.7%
🥰30616.3%
👏29615.8%
👍27914.9%
150.8%
😭30.16%
❤‍🔥10.053%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,876reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC121 viewsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @DexsportMainVideo

🪙 MONERO IS HERE Dexsport now accepts $XMR — bet with privacy. Win with power. XMR joins 50+ providers, 6,000+ games, sports, esports, and a casino loaded with multipliers & jackpots. All without KYC. Ready to go? 🔥

12 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC196 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ FIFA IS TURNING ON INFANTINO UEFA, AFC and CONCACAF have publicly accused the FIFA president of “deception” and a “fundamental breach of trust” over a plan to sell a stake in World Cup commercial rights to private investors. The proposal was dropped, but the confederations are now demanding an independent review. FIFPRO Europe has also warned that FIFA is facing a crisis of confidence. The pressure on Gianni In

2

7 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC195 views6 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @DexsportMainVideo

✅ Prediction Markets are live on Dexsport BTC price, election calls, award winners, breaking news – all tradeable, all on-chain, all in your wallet. Dexsport just added a new way to bet on literally anything ⚡️

2🤩2🔥1😭1

5 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC228 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @DexsportMainVideo

🟥🟥🟥🟥 Binance Pay is now on Dexsport We already supported 87 coins across 26 networks. Now, with Binance Pay, depositing and withdrawing any of these coins is even easier: If you keep your funds on Binance, topping up takes just a couple of taps. No addresses, no bridges, and no waiting. Load up, place your bets, and let the odds do the talking 🔥

2

28 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC338 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🟢"We're gonna need another color" Michael Saylor posted Strategy's Bitcoin chart on Sunday, July 26 with four cryptic words: "We're gonna need another color." The chart is a wall of orange dots – 113 Bitcoin buys since 2020. But Strategy just went a fourth straight week without adding a single coin, its longest pause in two years. Here's the twist most people miss. Saylor has used color before to mean cash, not Bi

👍2

24 Jul 2026, 17:42 UTC359 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

⚽️ TRANSFER MARKET JUST EXPLODED Just days after the final, several major deals have already been confirmed: 📌 Morgan Rogers → Chelsea 🤩 📌 Elliot Anderson → Manchester City 🏴 📌 Karim Adeyemi → Barcelona 🇪🇸 📌 Christos Tzolis → Arsenal 🔫 📌 Alejandro Garnacho → Aston Villa 🏴 The most interesting story is between Chelsea and Aston Villa: Chelsea bought Rogers from Villa, while Villa signed Garnacho from Chelsea on loan

20 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC411 views47 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🐳 Whales just drew a line at $72K Institutional traders put $2.5B in notional into a single Bitcoin bet: call spreads targeting $70K-$72K by July 31 – right after the Fed's July 29 decision. BTC sits near $64K now. That's a ~12% move they're pricing in two weeks. The tell is in the structure. They're not betting on the moon – gains are capped at $72K. This is a precise call: a controlled push, timed to the Fed, no

🎉12🤩9🔥8👍7🥰6👏5

16 Jul 2026, 15:49 UTC406 views24 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Strategy has stopped buying $BTC Michael Saylor's company has now gone three consecutive weeks without buying Bitcoin – despite raising fresh capital. Last week Strategy sold $466.7 million in stock and didn't put a dollar of it into BTC. The cash went to its reserve instead, now at a record $3 billion – a war chest for preferred dividends and debt payments, not for accumulation. Holdings sit unchanged at 843,775

🥰6👍5🔥5🎉3🤩3👏2

15 Jul 2026, 16:22 UTC392 views102 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Robinhood built a chain for stocks. Memecoins took it over in 48 hours. Robinhood Chain hit $3.1B in DEX volume in week one – top-5 among all chains. Tokenized stocks that trade 24/7 and work as DeFi collateral. Built for equities. Taken over by memecoins. Full breakdown in Dexsport Academy ℹ️

🤩22🔥21👏18🥰18🎉14👍81

14 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC355 views78 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

A Bitcoin whale just woke up after 7+ years – and moved 2,931 BTC worth ~$188M 🐳 When these coins last moved in October 2018, the stack was worth about $19 million. Today it's nearly 10x that, sitting on roughly $169 million in unrealized gains. Key detail: the BTC went to a fresh wallet, not an exchange. No sign of an immediate sale – the receiving address hasn't moved a single coin since. For now this looks like

🥰18🔥14🎉13🤩13👍11👏9

7 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC454 views83 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🇵🇹 Did Ronaldo Cry? Portugal’s World Cup exit turns into viral debate There was even a prediction market on whether he would cry after the match – with the probability reaching 71%. The cameras caught him in a seriously emotional moment, but in the end, the platform didn’t count it as tears. Do you think he actually cried or not?

🤩19🥰19👍14🎉13👏9🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Dexsport_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 382,529 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dexsport | Announcements” (@Dexsport_io), 35,998 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dexsport_io.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.