Un articol din care veți înșelege care e acea caracteristică „vinovată” de diferența dintre națiuni. Sau de ce unii sunt mari, iar ceilalți mici? https://trenduri.blogspot.com/2026/08/o-realizare-monumentala.html
👍126👏23❤14👨💻2🤝1
Signed Dan Diaconu

Channel
@DanDiaconu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16,189subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001308702886 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DanDiaconu |
| Description | Dan Diaconu - Trenduri Economice |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DanDiaconu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:59 | 16,189 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:42 | 16,190 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 16,194 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 16,201 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 16,206 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 16,213 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 16,216 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (16 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 275,740 |
| Reactions total | 9,834 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
9,834 reactions across 31 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7,366 | 74.9% | |
| 💯 | 706 | 7.18% | |
| ❤ | 615 | 6.25% | |
| 🤣 | 262 | 2.66% | |
| 🤬 | 210 | 2.14% | |
| 👏 | 166 | 1.69% | |
| ⚡ | 64 | 0.651% | |
| 😢 | 64 | 0.651% | |
| 🔥 | 55 | 0.559% | |
| 🤔 | 46 | 0.468% | |
| 🎉 | 29 | 0.295% | |
| 👎 | 28 | 0.285% | |
| 🆒 | 24 | 0.244% | |
| 👀 | 23 | 0.234% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 0.214% | |
| 🙈 | 21 | 0.214% | |
| 🤝 | 18 | 0.183% | |
| 🏆 | 17 | 0.173% | |
| 👌 | 16 | 0.163% | |
| 🤷 | 16 | 0.163% | |
| 8 further kinds | 67 | 0.681% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,834reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DanDiaconu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Un articol din care veți înșelege care e acea caracteristică „vinovată” de diferența dintre națiuni. Sau de ce unii sunt mari, iar ceilalți mici? https://trenduri.blogspot.com/2026/08/o-realizare-monumentala.html
👍126👏23❤14👨💻2🤝1
Signed Dan Diaconu
Cam lung articolul de astăzi și cu multe chestii tehnice. Vi-l sumarizez, cât să aveți un soi de cuprins, o hartă a ideilor principale. Iar dacă vă interesează, vă invit nerăbdător să-l citiți la sursă, într-o abordare mult mai închegată, din care promit să înțelegeți mai mult, dar și să învățați lucruri noi. Este despre AI, desigur, dintr-o perspectivă care intersectează tehnologia cu nebunia de pe burse. Raportăr…
👍154❤31👀9💯6🆒2
Signed Dan Diaconu
Cu toate că altele par a fi prioritățile, vă aduc în atenție situația demografică. Nu pentru a introduce îngrijorare în ecuație, ci pentru a vă proteja de abuzul ideologic. Vi s-au indus diverse idei absolut false, astfel încât e nevoie de clarificare. https://trenduri.blogspot.com/2026/08/despre-demografie-fara-perdea.html
👍181💯42❤🔥4👎3🎉1
Signed Dan Diaconu
N-aveți idee în ce țară trăiți! S-a ajuns ca politicienii „proioropieni” să elimine un eveniment cu o tradiție de peste un secol, neoprit de niciun eveniment catastrofal, deoarece „exista amenințarea de a veni Georgescu”. Citiți și cruciți-vă! https://ddwall.blogspot.com/2026/08/se-va-ajunge-ca-hartia-igienica-sa-aiba.html
👍236🤬65🙈21👀7✍3
Signed Dan Diaconu
Situația la zi din Iran ne arată fața parșivă a realității din teren, care nu seamănă deloc cu propaganda sau cu declarațiile dezarticulate ale clovnului de la Casa Albă. Citiți totul în analiza de azi. https://trenduri.blogspot.com/2026/08/situatia-la-zi-din-iran.html
👍252💯21❤19🎉5⚡4
Signed Dan Diaconu
Cu ce credeți că se ocupă vecinii noștri aflați în război? Cu lupta cu rușii? Vă înșelați! Au o altă luptă, mult mai profitabilă: cu proștii din UE și SUA. Citiți despre ce le-a dat prin cap și cruciți-vă! https://ddwall.blogspot.com/2026/08/alta-frauda-made-in-ukraine.html
👍243🤣28👌16⚡11😁5
Signed Dan Diaconu
Despre cum ne-a omorât politica climatică a Înaltei Porți de la Bruxelles și despre cât se slugarnici sunt imbecilii de la butoane. https://trenduri.blogspot.com/2026/08/decarbonizarea-si-inalta-poarta.html
👍281❤29😢11🆒6👎1
Signed Dan Diaconu
Au trecut cele 40 de zile pe care Zelensy le-ar fi dorit apocaliptice pentru Rusia. Rezultatul îl aveți în articolul atașat. https://ddwall.blogspot.com/2026/08/40-de-zile-inutile-si-costisitoare.html
👍271🔥17🤣12❤🔥11🎉7
Signed Dan Diaconu
Ucrainenii repetă incidentul de la Constanța în Bulgaria. https://ddwall.blogspot.com/2026/08/incident-grav-in-bulgaria.html
🤬145👍114💯40🔥15❤5
Signed Dan Diaconu
Iacătă că am ajuns și la problema spinoasă legată de incapacitatea românilor de a se revolta. Aveți întreg mecanismul care-i surprinzător de simplu și eficient. Iar de funcționat funcționează în orice regim. https://trenduri.blogspot.com/2026/08/de-ce-romanul-nu-se-revolta.html
👍250💯42😢19❤14🤔5
Signed Dan Diaconu
Azi o să vă explic practic modul în care am fost vânduți de politicienii autohtoni, prin prisma prețului energiei. Și, mai ales, vă voi explica de ce actualul preț aberant nu are nici cea mai mică posibilitate să scadă. Citiți și înțelegeți! https://trenduri.blogspot.com/2026/08/ceea-ce-nu-se-spune-sau-cum-v-au-vandut.html
👍254💯56😢14✍4👎4
Signed Dan Diaconu
Sunt ferm convins că Trump va rămâne în istorie ca cel care a prăbușit definitiv Occidentul. Să faci atâtea prostii într-un termen atât de scurt, e o performanță. Azi vă povestesc în detaliu cea mai mare greșeală pe care a făcut-o. https://trenduri.blogspot.com/2026/08/cum-prabusit-trump-intreg-occidentul.html
👍265💯42❤12👏8🆒6
Signed Dan Diaconu
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @DanDiaconu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 575,190 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“☀️ Dan Diaconu” (@DanDiaconu), 16,189 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DanDiaconu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.