Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 大马大爱分享群 3.0

Channel

大马大爱分享群 3.0

@DaMaAiSharing3

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,914subscribers

+196 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004291771045
TypeChannel
Username@DaMaAiSharing3
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 7 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DaMaAiSharing3

Growth

1,7181,9141,8167 August 2026 — 1,718 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,718 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,727 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,770 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,803 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,838 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,861 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,875 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,914 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net +196. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,689–1,943 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 03:471,914+39
24 Aug 2026, 22:351,875+14
21 Aug 2026, 14:471,861+23
18 Aug 2026, 04:021,838+35
14 Aug 2026, 21:431,803+33
11 Aug 2026, 10:031,770+43
8 Aug 2026, 02:021,727+9
7 Aug 2026, 21:021,718no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:351,718first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 1,914 subscribers
Avg views / post
196
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.381%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 4 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held4 (7 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total783
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 06s
Average length
3m 22s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱150.0%
🤔150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC114 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

【接单付费广告投放 | 群推广 | 其他】 有意者直接PM @callmedarkshadow 🇲🇾各种福利群👇 t.me/DaMaAiSharing3 🇲🇾IG 美女👇 t.me/MalaysiaBeautifulSharing 看更多美女 💋💋 t.me/MYLengLuiStation2

7 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC144 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#私拍泄密 #私拍 #素人 #母狗 #反差 高颜值反差网红网红周子冉大尺度定制视频激情裸聊裸舞真骚

7 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC263 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

大马美女网红被骗全裸试镜,影片被曝光后坦然回应:我已经不在意了 近期一段正妹裸体试镜模特儿的影片在网上疯传,不少网友透过身体特征认出女主角是马来西亚网红「养猪妹妹」,眼看事情藏不住,养猪妹妹干脆发文承认「反正我已经不在意了,你们留点口德吧」。 近日疯传的影片,只见一名年轻女子对着镜头自拍裸露的私密处、胸部等部位,网友比对身体特征后,怀疑片中女主角就是网红养猪妹妹。 私密影片外流后,甚至有人到养猪妹妹的抖音留言讥讽她的身材,眼看纸包不住火,养猪妹妹干脆跳出来承认影片女主角就是自己。 养猪妹妹在抖音发文表示,距离拍摄影片已经过了好几年,她提到当年试镜共有20多人受害被拍裸露影片,「我还是受害者里最年轻的」。 面对影片外流事件,养猪妹妹自认「现在已经长大」,只需正常往前走不再受骗就好了。 贴文曝光后网友纷纷替她打气,「确实没必要一直揪着不放,毕竟也是受害者」、「好好向前看」、「无需理会那些留言,加油」、「太强了,竟然可以做

🤔1😱1

7 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC262 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#原相机 #原档 #高颜值 #反差 #情侣自拍

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @DaMaAiSharing3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“大马大爱分享群 3.0” (@DaMaAiSharing3), 1,914 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DaMaAiSharing3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.