Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DX官方频道

Channel

DX官方频道

@DXchent

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,979subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002286780426
TypeChannel
Username@DXchent
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DXchent

Growth

3,9794,0424,010.58 August 2026 — 4,042 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,040 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,027 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,021 subscribers22 August 2026 — 4,008 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,979 subscribers8 August 202625 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 18 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,970–4,051 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 16:553,979-29
22 Aug 2026, 07:354,008-13
18 Aug 2026, 13:144,021-6
11 Aug 2026, 18:084,027-13
8 Aug 2026, 19:444,040-2
8 Aug 2026, 01:484,042first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

315 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20966.3%
🤣309.52%
🤬299.21%
🤮123.81%
😭103.17%
👏51.59%
41.27%
👍41.27%
🖕41.27%
🤗30.952%
🍌20.635%
💩10.317%
😁10.317%
🥰10.317%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 315reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 30 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 May 2026, 09:53 UTC≈2,700 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026

准备更换负责人 带来更好的项目 等待吧 抱歉大家

31🤬29

Signed 萧辰

30 May 2026, 09:27 UTC≈2,660 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

还有活人吗?

  1. 87%
  2. 没有13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤣306👏1🥰1😁1

Signed Ada

21 May 2026, 01:11 UTC≈3,440 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

不限期停更,随缘更新

29

Signed 天空

13 May 2026, 05:28 UTC≈4,120 views73 reactionsread 8 August 2026

想我了吗兄弟们

53🤮12🖕4🤗3💩1

Signed 萧辰

3 May 2026, 04:00 UTC≈4,630 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

等待下赛季吧各位 我们会为大家带来更好的服务体验 这个赛季确实搞的不太理想我们会吸取经验争取改进 对于公益卡密这个问题 我们会做出改进的 感谢大家支持

21

Signed 萧辰

27 Apr 2026, 15:49 UTC≈5,050 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

我爱所有支持我们的人,谢谢你们,下个赛季保持更新

16👏4

Signed 天空

27 Apr 2026, 15:46 UTC≈4,860 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

每个作者都很努力,你们可以选择玩自己喜欢的,没必要骂,不发卡密是我没钱,是的我没本事,你们可以玩其他的

12

Signed 天空

25 Apr 2026, 05:51 UTC≈4,160 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1

Signed 萧辰

25 Apr 2026, 05:51 UTC≈4,730 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1

Signed 萧辰

25 Apr 2026, 05:37 UTC≈3,400 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ASRKLE

免费卡密Gamer_W96864:565164

5

Signed 天空

25 Apr 2026, 05:33 UTC≈3,380 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

我会努力工作带给你们更好的公益体验的,谢谢你们😘

10

Signed 天空

25 Apr 2026, 05:31 UTC≈3,100 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

抱歉这个赛季我现实中的问题很繁忙,我会纠正我的错误,下个赛季绝对不会发生类似的事情了,谢谢你们喜欢dx

7

Signed 天空

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DXchent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 May 2026, 09:27 UTCAnonymous Poll830 voters

还有活人吗?

  1. 87%
  2. 没有13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 30 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 336,152 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DX官方频道” (@DXchent), 3,979 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DXchent.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.