Photo, posted without a caption
❤2

Channel
@CyberWlD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,225subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001768181595 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CyberWlD |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 15 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CyberWlD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 1,225 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 1,221 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:20 | 1,226 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:40 | 1,224 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 15 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5,098 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 2,440 | 47.9% | |
| ❤ | 1,234 | 24.2% | |
| 🔥 | 629 | 12.3% | |
| 🤩 | 469 | 9.20% | |
| 👏 | 193 | 3.79% | |
| 👍 | 129 | 2.53% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.078% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,098reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2023 to 16 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
祝各位新年快乐!
❤1
CloudFlare出现全球性灾难级故障事件,导致大部分企业网络与平台无法加载访问。目前已经恢复。
铭记历史、缅怀先烈、珍爱和平、开创未来
🙏3
🔥专业VPN机场老牌支付 👍赛博支付【CyberPay】 成立日期:2021年10月24日 联系客服:@CyberHi 官方频道:@CyberWlD 开户门槛:日流300CNY+ 业务范围:机场、VPN、发卡、游戏、视频、论坛、IDC 通道费率:5% 【支付宝/微信】 结算方式:USDT 结算周期:D0 🔥用户付款秒拉起全国访问无墙 🔥电脑与手机支付用户无感付款率99% 🔥只招收优质商家验盘开户-只开稳定车 🌈【愿时间会给我们最好的答案】
❤10
🔥赛博支付(CyberPay)成立于2021年。我们致力于为AI从业者商家提供稳定、高效、安全的支付结算解决方案。与我们合作即可使您的网站平台解决用户支付宝/微信收款问题。 ✅承接售卖GPT 、Gemini、Claude、Codex账号与中转站等各类业务合作,解决各位商家收款困难痛点。 联系我们开启您的致富通道 ✈️联系方式:@CyberHi
Photo, posted without a caption
Happy Shiba Inu pinned a photo
🔥专业VPN机场老牌支付 👍赛博支付【CyberPay】 成立日期:2021年10月24日 联系客服:@CyberHi 官方频道:@CyberWlD 开户门槛:日流300CNY+ 业务范围:不接黄赌毒诈擦边等高投诉、无售后商家 通道费率:5% 【支付宝/微信】 结算方式:USDT 结算周期:D1 🔥用户付款秒拉起全国访问无墙 🔥电脑与手机支付用户无感付款 🔥只招收优质商家验盘开户-只开稳定车 🌈【愿时间会给我们最好的答案】
Photo, posted without a caption
祝大家2024新年快乐🎉
Happy Shiba Inu pinned Deleted message
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @CyberWlD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 461,480 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Happy Shiba Inu” (@CyberWlD), 1,225 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CyberWlD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.