Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cryptonary

Channel

Cryptonary

@CryptonaryNews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,659subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001623580131
TypeChannel
Username@CryptonaryNews
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptonaryNews

Growth

6,6596,6756,6676 August 2026 — 6,675 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,670 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,664 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,659 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,657–6,677 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:066,659-5
10 Aug 2026, 15:576,664-6
7 Aug 2026, 10:506,670-5
6 Aug 2026, 12:336,675first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.61%
avg views ÷ 6,659 subscribers
Avg views / post
507
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (2 April 202630 July 2026)
Views total2,028
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3282.1%
🔥410.3%
👍37.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC379 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

WE ARE LIVE 🔴 The Fed blinked. The bond market didn’t. 30-year yields: highest since 2007. 📈 Three Fed officials voted to HIKE. Stocks rallied… then dumped into the close. The market has no idea what to do. We do 👇 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtaFawVOLfI

3

26 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC529 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

This was the biggest research week we’ve ever had 🚨 3 massive reports dropped in honour of the new app launch. • Our Head of Analysis changed his stance on the market. New BTC buy zones. • Our Head of Research made $PUMP an official Pick, with 2-5x potential on his levels. • And one of our Co-Founders built a watchlist of 26 ETFs across 10 emerging sectors he’s watching. All 3 are live inside the new Cryptonary

2

23 Jul 2026, 16:07 UTC549 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚨WE’RE LIVE🚨 Iran. Inflation. And where we'd actually buy. We’ll discuss the conflict, the inflation data, the recent reports, and the buy zones we're watching on BTC and beyond. The trades we're taking. All of it, live. First ever simulcast: YouTube, and the Cryptonary app. But questions? App only. That's where the alpha is. Not in yet? Join YT, and I'll get you in the app! https://www.youtube.com/live/Id-6yfR

2

22 Jul 2026, 18:23 UTC571 viewsread 12 August 2026

26 ETFs I'm watching like a hawk. And you should too. In the report, we've got 26 ETFs across 10 sectors. This is the start of a series where we're looking to come up with ETFs to add to our portfolios. This piece is the intro, and watchlist. Over the coming weeks, we'll turn this watchlist into a shortlist, and eventually a buy list. And we're doing it in real time, together. https://cryptonary.com/research/top-

16 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC704 viewsread 12 August 2026

The rate-hike fear that crushed your portfolio for 6 weeks just died this morning. Biggest Inflation drop since 2020. Hike odds: 8%. If you’re still positioned for last month’s market, you’re the exit liquidity for this one. Here’s exactly what you need to know. JOIN US 🔴 LIVE NOW https://www.youtube.com/live/kA_dk9OV-B8?si=RrOV_23J1kqePtlo

2 Jul 2026, 16:02 UTC824 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

We're live! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WQ24gApeHc

1

25 Jun 2026, 16:06 UTC≈1,090 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴 WE’RE LIVE Bitcoin just lost $59k. Are we about to crash to $50k? The team’s on now, breaking down exactly where BTC goes next, the altcoins we’re watching, and the levels we’d buy. We’re also debating ETH vs SOL vs HYPE Come in with a question, leave with a plan for the week. https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1qGvvvXRvwOGB?broadcastId=1qGvvvXRvwOGB&sourceId=37ckc4ayg6vi https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZW9tYgVDjo

1

30 May 2026, 12:53 UTC≈1,310 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

New stock pick dropping tomorrow 🚨 The $700B+ AI capex impulse isn't landing where most people think. The bottleneck has moved out of the chip itself. Into the power, the equipment, and the packaging that makes AI actually run. The companies building those pieces are sold out for years. Booked solid through 2029. Locked into 20-year contracts with the biggest names in tech. The market is still pricing them like b

🔥3

21 May 2026, 14:08 UTC≈1,220 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

This is one of the hardest markets we’ve ever seen, this id how we’re navigating it. Join us Live today @ 5PM UK 🔴 Three questions. Straight answers: The exact levels we're selling What we're buying right now The levels we'd throw the kitchen sink at Plus we're hitting: NVDA earnings. The trap nobody's pricing in. HYPE's run. How far it goes. The Iran/Us conflict.. Whats next? Drop your questions below. We'll a

👍32

18 May 2026, 10:39 UTC≈1,190 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Big week in crypto. NVDA earnings, FOMC minutes, UMich data, and 3 protocol deep dives you should not ignore. Here’s what’s dropping ↓ Mon → This Week’s Setup The macro and crypto map for the week, plus where we’re positioning. Mon → Drift Protocol Deep Dive How Drift is passing credit risk to end users, and why the market is missing it. Tue → Market Direction Where we stand on BTC, ETH, SOL, plus one memecoin wo

4

17 May 2026, 16:16 UTC823 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Don't waste your Sunday doomscrolling. Most crypto investors don't lose money because they pick bad projects. They lose money because they're looking at the wrong thing. They watch price. They watch candles. They watch Twitter. But price is the last thing to tell you the truth. By the time a move shows up on your chart, the investors who saw it coming were never watching the same thing you were. While you were l

3

14 May 2026, 16:09 UTC746 viewsread 12 August 2026

Going live right now! Trump is meeting Xi. Rumours are China will help broker with Iran. Markets are eating it up. Memecoins exploded over the weekend. Altcoins are bleeding. What happens next?👇​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zfRIOChsQ4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptonaryNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 372,142 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cryptonary” (@CryptonaryNews), 6,659 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptonaryNews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.