Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Family - RkY Sri Lanka

Channel

Crypto Family - RkY Sri Lanka

@CryptoFamilyRkY

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,424subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001749192321
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoFamilyRkY
DescriptionJOIN FOR RECOVERY YOUR LOSS
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 September 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/CryptoFamilyRkY

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 14:221,424first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 3 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,830
Videos
6
Links
136

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

249 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5622.5%
4518.1%
👍4016.1%
🥰3714.9%
🎉3012.0%
🤩2811.2%
custom 612756363857730415272.81%
🐳41.61%
👏20.803%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 249 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2025 to 15 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Feb 2026, 03:31 UTC≈2,000 views7 reactionsread 10 September 2026

On the weekly timeframe, price is currently reacting around the $68,000–$70,000 region, which aligns with the 200-week moving average. This level acts as long-term dynamic support. A strong weekly close above this zone increases the probability of stabilization. However, a sustained breakdown below $65,000 may lead to a deeper correction. On the 3-day chart, the descending trendline remains valid. Immediate resistan

🐳4👍21

5 Feb 2026, 11:37 UTC≈1,960 views12 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Small relief bounce coming soon... 👍⚠️

custom 61275636385773041527🔥4👍1

5 Feb 2026, 06:31 UTC≈1,810 views2 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Bullrun End 🥹⚠️🔴 This chart shows the full market cycle the way I’ve seen it repeat over multiple cycles. I’ve marked how Bitcoin moved from accumulation into expansion, topped out near ATH, and then entered a clear distribution phase. From my experience, ATH is usually not the start of upside but the end of the cycle, where structure weakens and smart money exits. After the structure break, the market shifted into

👏2

20 Jan 2026, 05:52 UTC≈1,780 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

BTCUSDT 8H Update BTC has already completed a strong bullish impulse from the 86–88K demand and delivered its expected move into premium. Price tapped the 97.5K–98K supply, took liquidity, and immediately showed rejection with momentum loss, confirming distribution rather than continuation. The failure to hold the 93.4K–93.6K EQ/FVG zone shifts short-term structure bearish, turning that area into resistance. As lo

15 Jan 2026, 04:41 UTC≈1,690 views0 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

📊 BTC 4H Update – Continuation As mentioned in the last update, after 90K held and a higher low was confirmed, BTC delivered a clean continuation breakout. Price strongly reclaimed the 93.6K resistance and pushed straight into the 96K+ zone. This was an impulse move, clearly showing buyers are in control. There are three bearish FVGs overhead, so a short-term pullback is possible. The immediate reaction zone is 96.

18 Dec 2025, 07:16 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

🎯 BTCD GAME PLAN What Happens If Bitcoin Dominance Pumps If Bitcoin Dominance starts pumping, it does NOT automatically mean BTC price will explode. It means capital is rotating. 🧠 Scenario 1: BTCD breaks 60.3% and holds above → Money rotates from altcoins into Bitcoin → Most altcoins start bleeding slowly → Small-cap and hype alts get hit first → Even if BTC goes sideways, alts can still drop 📉 Scenario 2: BTCD m

15 Dec 2025, 06:01 UTC≈1,590 views2 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

💥 BTC BOOM UPDATE 💥 Last update played out perfectly support sweep at 88.8K, trendline held, and price reacted exactly as expected. But don’t get emotional here. This move is a liquidity reaction, not a confirmed breakdown / BO. BTC is still below EMA 200, so any upside is not validated yet. If price pump above 93.5K, we can look for continuation towards 95K–97K. If rejected, expect another pullback towards 85K–88.

🔥2

14 Dec 2025, 05:55 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

🚨 BTC UPDATE !!! BTC right now indecision stage... Price major support zone (88,850) mela hold aagudhu romba weak playing. 👉 What’s happening now? Red trendline = ascending support Green line ≈ key demand zone EMA 200 (blue) = strong resistance above 93k Market clean ah breakout pannala, so expect liquidity grab to below $88,850

14 Dec 2025, 05:55 UTC≈1,500 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

🚨 BTC UPDATE (No Change) BTC is still trading in the same range no major change from yesterday. Price is holding above the key support zone at $88,850, but the reaction remains weak, showing market indecision. Current Structure: Red trendline → Ascending support still intact Green zone → Key demand area holding price EMA 200 (Blue) → Strong resistance near $93,000 Market Insight: There is no clean breakout yet.

9 Dec 2025, 16:55 UTC≈1,540 views2 reactionsread 10 September 2026
Photo

Nice breakout! 🔥🔥🔥🔥 This breakout happened exactly as expected this morning.

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @CryptoFamilyRkY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ali Khan Crypto
@Alikhancommunity1 · 46,653
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Family - RkY Sri Lanka” (@CryptoFamilyRkY), 1,424 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoFamilyRkY.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.