Channel
@CryptoAngelsUK
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27,010subscribers
-3,061 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001239304207 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoAngelsUK |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 40 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoAngelsUK |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026, 03:11 | 27,010 | -48 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 21:06 | 27,058 | -82 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 27,140 | -191 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 27,331 | -220 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 27,551 | -302 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 27,853 | -40 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 27,893 | -29 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 27,922 | -63 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:35 | 27,985 | -161 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 28,146 | -226 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 28,372 | -352 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 28,724 | -137 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 28,861 | -111 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:49 | 28,972 | -129 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 29,101 | -46 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 29,147 | -19 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 29,166 | -36 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 29,202 | -28 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 29,230 | -14 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 29,244 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🚀 SpaceX IPO: The Opportunity Retail Investors Have Been Waiting Years For There are thousands of public companies available to invest in today. But only a handful generate excitement before they even reach public markets. SpaceX belongs to that category. For years, investors have watched the company grow from an ambitious startup into one of the most valuable private businesses on the planet. Today, SpaceX opera…
-cool
BTC.D Bitcoin dominance is still stuck in the range between 58-60%. It's been in the same range for months now. As expected after tapping into the lower range area, BTC.D bounced back and is heading towards the higher range area at 60%. If the momentum continues, then we may see it at 60% or higher levels. We may see massive movement on either side once it breaks out of the range. Until then, we may see the choppy m…
BTC Nothing changes in the BTC scenario. The pullback from the 66k-65k zone continues nearly to 72k and then retraces back to 69k immediately. As mentioned earlier, until BTC stays below the 74k zone, the bias for BTC remains bearish. We are still expecting BTC at 61k or lower levels until it flips the 74k level. We will try to keep updating accordingly !!! @CryptoAngelsUK
BTC So far, BTC is moving as expected. As mentioned, we got the pullback from the 66k-65k zone. But the overall scenario is still unchanged. As mentioned earlier, as long as BTC stays below the 74k level, we are expecting BTC at 61k or lower levels in coming days. But if the 74k level gets flipped, then we may expect continuous bullish momentum. We will try to keep updating accordingly !!! @CryptoAngelsUK
Rez holding well retest done .. its will go for tp soon.. parabolic movement soon. @CryptoAngelsUK
Load some Rez and hold Expecting 10-20% in shortterm @CryptoAngelsUK
REZ/USDT (Binance) BUY : 0.0031 - 0.00333 CMP- 0.00331 Target: 0.00347 - 0.0037 - 0.004🔥🚀 Sl - 0.003 Chart looks good just buy and hold. @CryptoAngelsUK
. @CryptoAngelsUK
Defi are on 🔥 @CryptoAngelsUK
Next call soon @CryptoAngelsUK
BTC BTC is moving as expected. As mentioned, BTC is trying to pull back from the 65k-66k zone. We may see some pullback in the short term, but the overall scenario is still bearish. We are still expecting BTC at 61k or lower levels before the move towards higher levels. This bias is valid as long as it stays below the 74k level. We will try to keep updating accordingly !!! @CryptoAngelsUK
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoAngelsUK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Angels” (@CryptoAngelsUK), 27,010 subscribers as measured 15 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoAngelsUK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.