12 measurements spanning 32 days, net -114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,418–4,566 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 06:40
4,435
-20
3 Sept 2026, 05:53
4,455
-14
31 Aug 2026, 00:07
4,469
-7
27 Aug 2026, 20:23
4,476
-11
24 Aug 2026, 14:27
4,487
-17
20 Aug 2026, 16:03
4,504
-14
17 Aug 2026, 19:43
4,518
-6
15 Aug 2026, 02:47
4,524
-12
11 Aug 2026, 09:52
4,536
-9
8 Aug 2026, 12:38
4,545
-4
7 Aug 2026, 18:32
4,549
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:24
4,549
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
153 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
74
48.4%
❤
67
43.8%
🍓
8
5.23%
🔥
4
2.61%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Yakında 2’ye ayrılıyoruz
Reisacademy ve X aboneleri
ReisAcademy
→ Direkt işlemlerimden + eğitimlerden faydalanacak
→ Bana en yakın isimler, aile dediğim kişiler
→ Özel plan dahilinde kasa hedefli ilerleyeceğiz
Diğer aboneler
→ Canlı yayınlarıma katılacak
→ Abonelere özel X yayınları
→ Bot işlemleri
→ Soru sorabilecekler
ReisAcademy’ye girmek isteyenler içerden tanıdığı varsa öyle girebilecek.
Piyasadan komple ayrışıp…
Reisacademy olmayan varda ordaki bot işlem setuplarınıda abonelere özel paylasılacaktır extıradan kahve parasına
Abone olmak isteyen varsa abone olabilir
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CrptoReis07. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto Troia @cryptotroia · 65,622 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
CRYPTO BILLIONAIRES SIGNAL @Crypto_Billionaires_SIGNAL · 33,548 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 4 September 2026
dd @kripto_lejyoner · 37,229 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 31 August 2026
YOYOW🐳 @yoyowla · 85,977 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
ÖNCÜ KRİPTO @kriptooncu · 51,715 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 August 2026
HASOsyalmedya @HSNmedya · 38,145 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“👑 KriptoReis” (@CrptoReis07), 4,435 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CrptoReis07.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
