Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CriptoMonedas Calls

@CriptoMonedas_Calls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,322subscribers

-175 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001223150790
TypeChannel
Username@CriptoMonedas_Calls
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CriptoMonedas_Calls

Growth

2,3222,4972,409.57 August 2026 — 2,497 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,492 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,422 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,322 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -175. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,296–2,523 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:582,322-100
11 Aug 2026, 04:132,422-70
7 Aug 2026, 19:002,492-5
7 Aug 2026, 04:002,497first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.0%
avg views ÷ 2,322 subscribers
Avg views / post
697
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.622%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (17 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total14,639
Reactions total91
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

91 reactions across 21 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1213.2%
💯1011.0%
👍99.89%
🤔88.79%
77.69%
👀77.69%
👏77.69%
🥴77.69%
👎55.49%
🤯44.40%
💩22.20%
😐22.20%
😱22.20%
🙏22.20%
👌11.10%
👨‍💻11.10%
😁11.10%
🤡11.10%
🤨11.10%
🤮11.10%
1 further kind11.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC702 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🏦 LOS ACTIVOS TOKENIZADOS ACELERAN Mientras los depósitos en DeFi disminuyen, los RWA han triplicado su uso como garantía. 🚀 📈 La tokenización de activos del mundo real sigue ganando peso y se posiciona como uno de los casos de uso con mayor adopción en cripto. 💬 Tweet: https://x.com/cripto_calls/status/2085676799971774699

🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC606 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 El atacante del hackeo a Coldcard comenzó a mover los fondos robados. 🕵️ De acuerdo con la firma de análisis blockchain MistTrack, el hacker envió casi 65 BTC a través del mezclador Wasabi Wallet, una herramienta de privacidad que complica el seguimiento del origen y destino de las transacciones en la red Bitcoin. 👀 El movimiento podría marcar el inicio de un intento por ocultar parte del botín, aunque el grueso

🤔1🤯1😱1

4 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC705 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💳 Western Union da un paso más en la adopción de las stablecoins. La compañía presentó una tarjeta de pago compatible con USDPT, su stablecoin emitida sobre la red Solana, permitiendo realizar compras de forma rápida y sencilla en comercios. ⚡ Con este movimiento, Western Union apuesta por integrar los activos digitales en los pagos cotidianos, aprovechando la velocidad y las bajas comisiones de Solana para ofrecer

👏21👀1👍1💯1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC8 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🏛️ BlackRock lanzó dos fondos tokenizados para respaldar stablecoins. La gestora de activos presentó dos nuevos fondos tokenizados diseñados para actuar como reservas de respaldo de stablecoins, en línea con los requisitos establecidos por la Ley GENIUS en Estados Unidos. Estos vehículos ofrecen activos líquidos y de alta calidad para que los emisores puedan cumplir con las nuevas exigencias regulatorias, reforzand

🔥2👏1🙏1

2 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC≈1,310 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🏦 Las instituciones siguen cargando Ethereum. Los ETF de Ethereum adquirieron 365 millones de dólares en ETH durante julio, registrando el mayor volumen mensual de compras desde octubre de 2025. Este dato refuerza el creciente interés institucional por Ethereum y sugiere que los grandes inversores continúan aumentando su exposición al segundo mayor criptoactivo del mercado. 📊 Mientras el mercado sigue pendiente de

1👀1👍1💯1🔥1🤯1

1 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC609 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥LATEST🔥 Las pérdidas derivadas del hackeo de Coldcard ya superan los 1.128 BTC, con un valor aproximado de 70 millones de dólares. 🤯 El alcance del ataque continúa ampliándose a medida que se identifican nuevas direcciones comprometidas, convirtiéndose en uno de los mayores incidentes de seguridad relacionados con wallets de Bitcoin en los últimos años. ⚠️ Si utilizas una Coldcard, asegúrate de comprobar que tien

👎1🤔1🥴1😐1😱1

31 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC707 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Coinkite publicó un parche de emergencia para sus wallets Coldcard después de que una vulnerabilidad crítica fuera explotada en un ataque coordinado que habría provocado el robo de al menos 594 BTC. La empresa recomienda a todos los usuarios instalar la actualización de firmware lo antes posible para proteger sus fondos. El incidente vuelve a poner de relieve la importancia de mantener los dispositivos hardware si

👀1👎1💩1🥴1😐1

30 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC712 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 La bolsa de EE. UU. suma $900.000 millones tras un dato histórico de inflación El mercado estadounidense arrancó la sesión con una fuerte subida después de que el índice PCE, la medida de inflación preferida por la Reserva Federal, registrara su primera caída mensual en seis años. 📉 Este dato refuerza la expectativa de que la Fed pueda recortar los tipos de interés en los próximos meses, impulsando el apetito por

👀1👍1💯1🤔1

29 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC610 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📱 Ledger publicó la versión 4.13.0 de su aplicación móvil con varias mejoras de estabilidad y privacidad. Entre las novedades destacan: ✅ Corrección de errores en los envíos de criptomonedas, la libreta de contactos y la función de swaps. ✅ Comisiones más transparentes para las transacciones en la red TRON. ✅ Solución al fallo del teclado en dispositivos iPhone (iOS). ✅ Mayor privacidad gracias a una mejor gestión

👏1🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC811 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Bitcoin y Ethereum registran fuertes caídas tras un nuevo retraso de la Crypto Clarity Act en el Senado de EE. UU. La demora en la votación de una de las leyes más importantes para el futuro de la industria cripto ha aumentado la incertidumbre entre los inversores, provocando una fuerte presión vendedora en el mercado. Aunque el retraso ha afectado al sentimiento a corto plazo, muchos analistas consideran que la

👎1🥴1

27 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC708 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 ÚLTIMA HORA Strategy, la compañía liderada por Michael Saylor, acumula ya cinco semanas sin añadir más bitcoin a sus reservas, marcando su periodo más largo sin compras desde octubre de 2024. La pausa ha llamado la atención del mercado, ya que la estrategia de acumulación de la empresa ha sido uno de los principales motores del sentimiento alcista durante los últimos años. Ahora, los inversores esperan conocer si

👎1🤔1🤨1

26 Jul 2026, 22:24 UTC710 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚫 La Unión Europea endurece su postura frente a las criptomonedas vinculadas a Rusia. La UE ha bloqueado las operaciones de 14 exchanges de criptomonedas presuntamente relacionados con la movilización de fondos rusos, en un intento por impedir la evasión de las sanciones internacionales. 🇪🇺 La decisión llega después de la aprobación del nuevo marco legal para los criptoactivos en Rusia y refleja un mayor control so

🤯1🥴1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @CriptoMonedas_Calls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 787,051 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CriptoMonedas Calls” (@CriptoMonedas_Calls), 2,322 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CriptoMonedas_Calls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.