🎁
custom 54113119872357893339custom 54112043510603824785custom 54112725637309757103

Channel
@CriptaDucks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,427subscribers
-46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003682152335 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CriptaDucks |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 22 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CriptaDucks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 2,427 | -17 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 2,444 | -28 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:52 | 2,472 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 2,473 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
750 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5411272563730975710 | 261 | 34.8% | |
| custom 5411337181513948308 | 123 | 16.4% | |
| custom 5411311987235789333 | 108 | 14.4% | |
| custom 5411585679731756679 | 107 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5411204351060382478 | 85 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5411229395014686472 | 43 | 5.73% | |
| custom 5409256003571061958 | 23 | 3.07% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 750reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2026 to 27 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CriptaDucks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 February 2026 to 27 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎁
custom 54113119872357893339custom 54112043510603824785custom 54112725637309757103
🎁 РОЗЫГРЫШ 🎁 На ночь Условия: 🎁 @criptaducks @Torfin_NFT1 Буст + реакция = победа ⚡️ На отписку 10 мин‼️
custom 541127256373097571062custom 541131198723578933328custom 541122939501468647221custom 54115856797317566796custom 54092560035710619584custom 54113371815139483083
Как у вас дела вообще? 😋 Расскажите в коммах…
🤩По вашем просьбам дорогие пользователи бота 🤩 -добавили в бота оплату по банковской карточке -улучшали процессинг бота✔️ -улучшили дизайн бота✔️ - а так же сейчас моментальная выдача всего что есть в шопе @Starsbotsekl_bot
custom 54112725637309757104custom 54115856797317566794
Ну наконец-то в нашем боте, снова добавили оплату картой ✔️ Данный курс 1⭐-1.24₽
custom 54112293950146864724custom 54115856797317566794custom 54112043510603824782
⭐ 150 Звезд на 3 победителя ⭐ Условия:‼️ @BAHTAP Буст + реакция повышает шанс Конец через 10 минут ⚡️
custom 541127256373097571030custom 541122939501468647211custom 541133718151394830811custom 54113119872357893337custom 54092560035710619581custom 54112043510603824781custom 54115856797317566791
Хотите розыгрыш на нфт? Если да - 🤩
custom 541127256373097571059custom 54112293950146864727custom 54115856797317566797
50 ⭐ - на 100 кликов 🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победитель: 1. Lena (@Lena_iva2) ✔️Проверить результаты
custom 541158567973175667932custom 541120435106038247817custom 541127256373097571015
Сново понижение цен 🎁 Прайсы: 50 ⭐- 62₽ 100⭐- 123₽ @Starsbotsekl_bot
custom 54113371815139483088
Все падает к сожалению🤩
custom 54113371815139483087custom 54115856797317566795custom 54112725637309757104
РОЗЫГРЫШ 100 ⭐️ 2 победителя УСЛОВИЯ 🎁 @wenduy1 @DurovStarsNews Реакция и буст повышает шанс а конец через час 🤩
custom 541133718151394830831custom 541120435106038247816custom 541127256373097571011custom 54115856797317566794
В Госдуме предложили Telegram открыть официальное представительство в России 👊 Надо хранить персональные данные пользователей на российских серверах и выстроить взаимодействие со спецслужбами 🤩 Если телега не будет хранить наши подарки в России, то их запретят???? ПИЗДЕЕЦ 🤩 ————————————— 📱 Чатик Купить звезды ⭐️
custom 54112725637309757105custom 54113119872357893333custom 54113371815139483081
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CriptaDucks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@CriptaDucks named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GUSSI” (@CriptaDucks), 2,427 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CriptaDucks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.