CowboyCallZ🤠 pinned a photo

Channel
CowboyCallZ🤠
@CowboyCallz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,000subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001202395204 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CowboyCallz |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CowboyCallz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 3,000 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 3,008 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 3,017 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 3,019 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 3,019 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
168 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 65 | 38.7% | |
| ❤ | 44 | 26.2% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 14.9% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 5.36% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 5.36% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 4.76% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.98% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.79% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2023 to 13 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🤠8X🤠 Hachiko is running, passed 2 mil & team is still grinding hard to keep up the momentum👏
🔥8🤩3🎉1👍1👏1🥰1
CowboyCallZ🤠 pinned a photo
🤠5X🤠 Milly mark has been smashed by Hachiko, fantastic work from the team behind it & community have been strong since the start🤝
🔥13❤12👍3🎉2🤩2🥰2👏1
CowboyCallZ🤠 pinned a photo
🤠 2X 🤠 Hachiko has been holding strong for a few weeks now & now having a decent run, the team have been grinding & the community have been patient👏 Milly soon?
👍10❤7🥰3😁2🤩1
BSC: I’ve aped Hachiko at around 300k mc🤠 Launched about 6 days ago & has been slowly gaining traction, the team have been grinding this out and seem to be really dedicated to the project. The chart has been holding up really well so keen to see how it can perform over the next few days! DYOR NFA @cowboycallz https://t.me/hachiko_bnb_chat
🔥16❤7👍3🥰3🎉2👏2🤩2😁1
CowboyCallZ🤠 pinned a photo
🤠4X🤠 Great bounce from the bottom on EthDice let’s hope it holds strong & runs for another leg🤝 @cowboycallz
❤16🔥7👍2
ETH: DEGEN I’ve aped EthDice at 65k mc🤠 This has recently launched & had a pretty good run up since launch but looks like a nice dip at the minute but keep eyes out for entries, still only 200 holders & first utility is live which is a gambling eth dice game with more games in development it has a nice narrative if the team stay dedicated to pushing out new developments🤠 DYOR NFA @cowboycallz https://t.me/EthdiceOf…
❤2👍1
CowboyCallZ🤠 pinned a photo
🤠12X🤠 $Havoc going from strength to strength approaching 10 mil, Great work from everyone involved & looks like the utility will be live in the next few days which is exciting🤠 @cowboycallz
👍2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CowboyCallz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 425,195 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@CowboyCallz named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CowboyCallZ🤠” (@CowboyCallz), 3,000 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CowboyCallz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.