Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 66 days, net -155. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,722–4,923 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Oct 2026, 14:11
4,745
-17
5 Oct 2026, 18:57
4,762
-9
28 Sept 2026, 15:38
4,771
-39
15 Sept 2026, 21:18
4,810
-10
11 Sept 2026, 21:56
4,820
-4
7 Sept 2026, 06:18
4,824
-10
2 Sept 2026, 08:36
4,834
-12
30 Aug 2026, 18:56
4,846
-9
27 Aug 2026, 21:38
4,855
-7
24 Aug 2026, 18:58
4,862
-3
21 Aug 2026, 08:46
4,865
-12
18 Aug 2026, 08:24
4,877
-9
14 Aug 2026, 23:46
4,886
-3
12 Aug 2026, 00:25
4,889
-7
8 Aug 2026, 19:54
4,896
-4
7 Aug 2026, 20:45
4,900
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:38
4,900
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 27s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,299 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,120
48.7%
❤
793
34.5%
👏
76
3.31%
❤🔥
74
3.22%
😱
61
2.65%
🙏
36
1.57%
🤔
28
1.22%
💯
26
1.13%
👌
24
1.04%
👀
11
0.478%
🏆
10
0.435%
🤓
9
0.391%
🥰
7
0.304%
⚡
6
0.261%
😍
6
0.261%
🔥
5
0.217%
🤩
4
0.174%
🎉
1
0.043%
😴
1
0.043%
🤯
1
0.043%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,299 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2023 to 3 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Delfines hicieron un escudo para proteger a un padre y su hija de un tiburón blanco. 🦈
Lo que parecía un día normal de playa en Nueva Zelanda se convirtió en algo increíble. Rob Hoey y su hija estaban en el agua cuando un grupo de delfines los rodeó. No estaban jugando: los encerraron en un círculo y no los dejaban salir cada vez que intentaban alejarse.
La razón apareció poco después: se acercaba un tiburón blanco…
Cuando nos rasuramos la zona V desde abajo hacia arriba, vamos contra el crecimiento del vello, lo que puede causar irritación, cortes y vellos encarnados debido a la agresividad del corte.
Afeitarse hacia abajo y a los lados, siguiendo la dirección del crecimiento del pelo, reduce la irritación y el riesgo de cortes, siendo más suave para la piel sensible de esa área. Es importante usar una cuchilla afilada, aplica…
¿Sabías que al agregar un poco de aceite de oliva alrededor de tus ollas al momento de cocinar le permitirá que el agua no se salpique mientras se esté cocinando? 😉🥣
¿Quieres perfeccionar tu ortografía o la de tus hijos? Te invito a descargar nuestra nueva app: "Cómo Dominar la Ortografía", disponible ahora en Play Store para Android. Haz clic aquí: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.csapps.comodominarlaortografia.
¡No olvides dejar tu calificación y reseña! ¡Tu opinión es importante para nosotros!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ConsejosSaludablesTv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Consejos Saludables 🍍” (@ConsejosSaludablesTv), 4,745 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ConsejosSaludablesTv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.