4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,107–1,110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 03:11
1,107
-2
8 Aug 2026, 16:56
1,109
-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:03
1,110
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:38
1,110
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 8 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.54%
avg views ÷ 1,107 subscribers
Avg views / post
17.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
17.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
16 (8 December 2025 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
17
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
65 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
23
35.4%
🔥
17
26.2%
❤
12
18.5%
❤🔥
11
16.9%
👌
1
1.54%
👏
1
1.54%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Community_AUM. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 December 2025 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Agritourists at YogaFerma ☀️
We recently had some agritourists visit us—people who wanted to immerse themselves in the real life of an organic farm, even if just for a day.
It was a packed day. We worked together in the garden, harvested fresh vegetables, and immediately cooked them over an open fire for lunch. We strolled through endless fields, took photos among the golden wheat, went horseback riding, tried wate…
The 2026 season is in full swing! 🔥
This year, we planted:
— Winter wheat — 230 ha
— Barley — 200 ha
— Sunflower — 250 ha
— Spelt — 10 ha
We completed planting in the second week of June. ✅
At the same time, we have already harrowed the wheat and carried out weeding and hilling of the sunflowers. Several more stages of mechanical weed control are still ahead — all done without chemicals, just as always. 🌱
The cro…
Friends, we have some great news! 🔥
We’ve added two more plots to our land—150 hectares and 40 hectares. To some, these are just numbers, but for us, they mean new opportunities, more work, and more high-quality grain in the future. 😜
Now the total area of our cropland is about 1,000 hectares. In total, we manage about 1,200 hectares—some of the land is set aside for pastures.
The photo shows a map of all our fiel…
The Myth of Global Hunger: Why Rejecting Chemicals Won't Destroy Us 🌾
For decades, we've been fed a scary idea: without herbicides, fungicides, and piles of synthetic fertilizers, humanity will starve to death. Agrichemical corporations convinced the world that poisoning the land is the only way to feed 8 billion people.
When I say that on our 800 hectares in Tokarevsky District, Tambov Region, we grow clean wheat,…
Smart-Agronomy: bringing our fields on-chain 💯
Anyone can write "100% Organic" on a package. But how do you actually prove to investors and buyers that not a single drop of pesticides touched the soil?
We turned trust into math and launched Smart-Agronomy. To make the entire growing process transparent, we set up a dedicated crypto wallet. It's now an open digital logbook of our farm. Every agrotechnical operation …
Do you know how many people our farm can feed? 🤔
We took our 2,000 tonnes of grain and did the math. If one person eats about 120 kg of bread per year, our harvest is enough for 16,500 people.
Simple math: 2 million kg ÷ 120 kg = 16,500. 🍃
That's enough to supply bread for an entire district centre. And that's just grain — not counting sunflower, corn, soy, and everything else we grow.
Here's the important part: t…
Friends, we've got important news to share — we've submitted our trademark application in the Russian Federation, paid the official fee, and the name YogaFerma is now officially reserved for us!🔥
This isn't just paperwork — it's another significant step forward this year. Securing the brand name is essential for executing our large-scale plans. We're building the foundation for a thriving $AUM ecosystem. 😜
❓ Quick …
Hi everyone!
We’ve got some important and genuinely exciting news 🔥
Over the past month, we’ve been working intensively on our new website. We revisited the project’s concept, rethought our core ideas, and built a full development roadmap.
With the launch of the new site, the project becomes more serious and more structured: all information will be clearly organized in one place, fully up to date, and presented in…
3 February marks exactly one year since our project began.
Over this time, YogaFerma has grown from an idea into a living project with a real farm, a team, a community, and its own token — $AUM.
This year was full of hard work, decisions, experiments, and growth. We launched the token, obtained organic farming certification, and brought together people who care about growing clean, chemical-free food and developing …
Dear friends!
We’re sharing an update on the dividend distribution 💰
This time — wheat 😱
We partially sold the wheat harvest, resulting in a profit of 5 million RUB.
5% of the received profit was allocated to:
- buyback of the $AUM token
- dividend distribution
🔥 The total amount amounted to approximately 1,800 TON
Over the course of two weeks, we carried out buybacks of 100 TON at a time, allowing almost the ent…
We attended an event hosted as part of the Exporter of the Year competition 🚜
This year we joined as guests, but next year we’re planning to take part in an international exhibition and showcase our products 🍃
It was especially great to make many new connections and establish several truly promising contacts.
Moving forward 👍
Chat | Website | Buy token $AUM | CIS channel
Friends, there has been an increase in cases of fake accounts pretending to be our team and trying to scam members of the community.
✅ The only official contacts of our team are:
@Karma_gyatgo — Founder
@dota_reperok — Administrator
👉 If someone else contacts you, it is a scam.
💡 Please always check:
— the exact username (scammers often use very similar names);
— the “About” section — it may list our username, but…
👍2❤🔥1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Community_AUM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“$AUM | YogaFerma - Farm news” (@Community_AUM), 1,107 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Community_AUM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.