Channel
@ComLedger
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,128subscribers
-27 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003935250253 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ComLedger |
| Created | 25 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ComLedger |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 1,128 | -24 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:41 | 1,152 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 1,155 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 1,155 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (25 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,057 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
JUST IN: An attacker stole $500K and immediately lost $370K. After draining a victim’s wallet for $500K, the attacker swapped the stolen funds using maximum slippage and accidentally paid over $370K in fees, receiving just 67 ETH ($130K). @ComLedger
JUST IN: FBI agent found guilty of stealing $1M in crypto from a suspect’s account The agent used internal FBI systems to obtain the login details for a suspect’s account holding $1M in crypto, then withdrew the entire balance to his own wallet. After successfully stealing the funds, he asked ChatGPT how to launder them. @ComLedger
UPDATE: Telegram is back on the App Store worldwide Telegram has been restored to App Store and is once again available to download normally. @ComLedger
JUST IN: Over 1,432 BTC ($90M) stolen as a fourth wave of thefts begins A fourth wave of thefts targeting Coldcard users has begun, with over 390 BTC stolen in this wave alone. Every Coldcard version has been affected, bringing total losses to 1,432 BTC across 5,200 victims. @ComLedger
JUST IN: Over 1,350 BTC ($85M) stolen as a third wave of thefts begins Three separate waves of thefts have occurred over the past 24 hours, targeting every version of the Coldcard hardware wallet. More than 1,500 victims have lost all their Bitcoin holdings. @ComLedger
JUST IN: Bitcoin hardware wallet Coldcard has been exploited for 594.48 BTC ($38.2M) More than 500 victims who believed their Bitcoin was secure in a hardware wallet lost all of their funds overnight, with 594.48 BTC drained within just 25 minutes. @ComLedger
JUST IN: Notorious Cybercrime group "Lazarus" has moved 120 BTC ($7M) The cybercrime group has stolen over $6B since 2017 by hacking major crypto exchanges and has now moved 120 BTC across multiple wallets, likely to split the funds. @ComLedger
JUST IN: Coinbase warns users about a new social engineering scam Threat actors are impersonating the IRS and sending physical letters to victims to obtain their phone numbers before targeting them with social engineering scams. @ComLedger
JUST IN: The first half of 2026 was the worst six-month period for crypto hacks in history A total of 212 exploits resulted in $1.1B stolen, with social engineering scams causing 74% of all thefts. Most of the largest thefts this year were also carried out through social engineering. @ComLedger
JUST IN: Crypto wallet company loses $12M to a social engineering scam An employee was social engineered into giving an attacker the seed phrase to the company’s treasury wallet, resulting in $12M being stolen. @ComLedger
JUST IN: Centralized crypto exchange BitMart is shutting down The exchange has asked all users to withdraw their crypto before August 26, after which deposits and all remaining platform functions will be disabled. @comLedger
🎉 $111 USDT GIVEAWAY 🎉 Hosted By: @ComLedger Requirements: • Join @Comledger Participants: 344 Giveaway Ended 🍑 Winners: • @MrEmpireTG
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ComLedger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 351,418 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Com Ledger” (@ComLedger), 1,128 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ComLedger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.