6 measurements spanning 19 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,278–4,297 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 20:17
4,280
-4
3 Sept 2026, 11:39
4,284
-1
28 Aug 2026, 09:26
4,285
-7
25 Aug 2026, 06:19
4,292
+2
22 Aug 2026, 11:34
4,290
-5
21 Aug 2026, 03:30
4,295
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 18 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
30 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
28
93.3%
👍
1
3.33%
😍
1
3.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2023 to 24 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅Exciting Collaboration Opportunity for Researchers!
✅Are you looking to have research papers in high-ranking journals? Here’s your chance!
⭐️We’re offering a fantastic opportunity for researchers interested in publishing research papers. The process is straightforward – all you need to do is cover the publication fee.
⭐️If you're interested, please send me your google scholar Page directly at @Enhance_Admin. Let’…
✅With this Chrome extension, you can ask questions about the article.
✅ Select any section of the article you want, and click on Ask.
✅Download and install:
https://typeset.io/copilot-chrome-plugin
✅Channel:
@CiteEnhancePro
✅Admin:
@Enhance_Admin
⭐️⭐️AI-generated nonsense about rat with giant penis published by leading scientific journal
A scientific paper purporting to show the signalling pathway of sperm stem cells has met with widespread ridicule after it depicted a rodent with an anatomically eye-watering appendage and four giant testicles.
The creature, labelled “rat”, was also sitting upright in the manner of a squirrel, while the graphic was littered…
✅✅
Researchers who are having trouble verifying their Google Scholar account due to not having a academic email, can contact the admin to resolve their issue.
✅✅More Details: 👇👇 @Enhance_Admin
🔥🔥
Researchers who are having trouble verifying their ResearchGate account due to not having a academic email, can contact the admin to resolve their issue.
More Details: 👇👇 @Enhance_Admin
✅Enhance your academic resume by participating in articles for applying, study migration, PhD, and the excellence visa NIW in the US with articles and increasing and Boosting citations and H-Index promotion 🧑🎓🧑
✅The strongest and most committed research group with 24-hour support
✅For information on conditions, message the ID below👇 ✅Contact Admin for immediate consultation: 🆔 @Enhance_Admin
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @CiteEnhancePro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Faculty Plus @facultypluss · 28,696 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
((( TATLISES DÜNYASI ))) @TatlisesDunyasi · 40,896 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 30 August 2026
سیویلیکا، مرجع مقالات علمی @civilicacom · 66,680 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Citation Enhance - Citation Pro النشر العلمي ️️” (@CiteEnhancePro), 4,280 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CiteEnhancePro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.