Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cɪɴᴇᴍᴀ Tᴡᴇᴇᴛs | سینما توییتز

Channel

Cɪɴᴇᴍᴀ Tᴡᴇᴇᴛs | سینما توییتز

@CinemaTweets

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

1,959subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001355435108
TypeChannel
Username@CinemaTweets
Created1 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CinemaTweets

Growth

1,9591,9741,966.56 August 2026 — 1,974 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,972 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,970 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,968 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,964 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,962 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,961 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,959 subscribers6 August 202625 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,957–1,976 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 21:531,959-2
23 Aug 2026, 06:381,961-1
20 Aug 2026, 03:521,962-2
17 Aug 2026, 12:461,964-4
14 Aug 2026, 08:261,968-2
10 Aug 2026, 22:021,970-2
7 Aug 2026, 15:551,972-2
6 Aug 2026, 16:041,974first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 May 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 39s
Average length
2m 39s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

401 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍21152.6%
👎8120.2%
😁7418.5%
358.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 401reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2022 to 16 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jan 2025, 20:54 UTC≈2,050 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‍ ساختار فانتزى اساساً نجات بخش است. بدان علت كه فانتزى به جاى تامين جواب در سطح تفكر، صحنه‌اى برپا مى‌كند، مى‌تواند جنبه الزاما نامرئی ساختار نمادين را به ما نشان بدهد. فانترى سوژه را به فراتر از قواعد حاكم بر تجربه ممكن – فراتر از محدوديت‌هاى فهم – مى‌برد و به سبب آن، چنانکه در هركدام از فيلم‌هاى لينچ ديديم، ناممكن را تجسم مى‌كند. تصور فراسو از يک سو سوژه را چنین اغوا مى‌كند که گویا او به ابژه‌ای كه واقعاً در اختيا

11👍2

Signed Jade

30 Jun 2024, 07:16 UTC≈3,160 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مقایسه‌ی سایز اژدهایان دنیای گیم آف ترونز @CinemaTweets | Arash

👍12

Signed Arash🇫🇷

17 Jan 2024, 03:45 UTC≈4,560 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

بدون شرح… @CinemaTweets | Arash

👎16👍61😁1

Signed Arash

22 Nov 2023, 22:19 UTC≈4,640 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

6.01 “Wine and Roses”🥀 #BetterCallSaul @CinemaTweets | annie

👍41

Signed Arash

3 Nov 2023, 22:41 UTC≈4,750 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

فردا قسمت آخر انیمه Attack on Titan پخش میشه. این متنی که سه سال پیش نوشتیم رو داشتم میخوندم. متن ایرادات زیادی داره اگه از لحاظ یه نقد آکادمیک و با ساختار بهش نگاه کنیم و شایدم جاهاییش غیرمنصفانه باشه. ولی به عنوان یه متن که ایراداتِ پایان بندی‌ای که فردا قراره بیاد و به طور کلی فصل آخر رو بیان میکنه، همچنان چیزایی که توش گفتیم رو سرش هستم و معتقدم ضعف‌های فصل آخر اینقدر تو چشم هستن که نمیشه ازشون گذشت. اتک برای م

👍145👎4

Signed Arash

26 Jun 2023, 05:26 UTC≈5,610 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

یکی نولان رو از برق بکشه تا همه‌ی فیلم رو تعریف نکرده؛ روزی سه‌تا مصاحبه می‌کنه تو هر کدومم یه اسپویل ریز: این‌جاش سوبژکتیوه، وسطش گریه می‌کنید، آخرش مثل اینسپشنه، ترانه‌ی انتهاییش رو شادمهر خونده. ‏یه کم عزت نفس داشته باش مرد، تو نولانی باباجان باربی انقدر ترس نداره :)) @Cinematweets | احسان آهنی

😁30👍5

Signed Arash

4 Jun 2023, 14:57 UTC≈5,280 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‍ ‍ فروش فیلم و سریال‌هایِ مبتذل، با کمکِ افرادی تضمین می‌شود که هنرشان رذالت است. به‌جایِ توانایی هنری، آموزش، خلاقیت و... به رذالت نیاز دارند: هرچه رذل‌تر، محبوب‌تر و موفق‌تر. به این برشِ کوتاه از به‌اصطلاح طنزشان نگاه کنید. این جملات اگر از حلقوم یک آخوندِ منبری یا بسیجی خارج شده بود، شبکه‌های اجتماعی مملو شده بود از ابراز خشم به کسانی‌‌که بازداشت می‌کنند، شکنجه و تجاوز می‌کنند و به زخمِ بازداشتی و قربانی تجاوزِ

👍45👎9😁1

Signed C.W.A

4 Jun 2023, 07:35 UTC≈3,740 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ژان-لوک گدار: «ژاک روزیه در کایه دو نبود ولی به تنهایی یک موج‌ نوی تمام و کمال بود.» Jacques Rozier (1926-2023) @Cinematweets

7👍1👎1

Signed C.W.A

2 Jun 2023, 16:35 UTC≈3,870 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎥 Twin Peaks @Cinematweets | Arash

8👎1

Signed Arash

4 May 2023, 07:47 UTC≈3,670 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

اوه اوه پول اینا رو بدین تا بگامون ندادن #Succession @Cinematweets | Arash

👍171

Signed Arash

24 Apr 2023, 05:27 UTC≈3,890 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎥 Marvelous Mrs. Maisel @Cinematweets | Arash

👍7👎1

Signed Arash

17 Apr 2023, 18:33 UTC≈4,640 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

مدتی بود که دنبال یه سریال خوب بودم که ناگهان با این سریال “میلیاردها” آشنا شدم سریالی که با توجه به ژانر آن که درام هست اصلا خشک و خسته کننده نیست و این قدر پتانسیل بالایی داره که در اولین اپیزود آن شما رو شکار خودش میکنه و دو کارکتر اصلی این ماجرا میبینم ویژگی مشترکشون باهوش بودن هست و دست به هر کاری میزنن حتی شرافتشون لکه‌دار می‌کنن که صدر قدرت بمونن و سمت دیگری رو شکست بدن، جنگی که خیلی لذت داره به شدت توصیه می ک

👍8👎2

Signed Arash

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @CinemaTweets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Apr 2023, 19:15 UTCAnonymous Poll452 voters

زنده کنیم اینجا رو ؟

  1. نه19%
  2. آره برگردید81%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2022 to 16 January 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cɪɴᴇᴍᴀ Tᴡᴇᴇᴛs | سینما توییتز” (@CinemaTweets), 1,959 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CinemaTweets.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.