I don't trade silver but price gave a very good entry confirmation from the 4hr IRL This is one entry we will be talking about in the bootcamp
❤28🔥11😱2

Channel
@ChartTactix
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
9,561subscribers
+923 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002838095252 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ChartTactix |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ChartTactix |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 21:19 | 9,561 | +119 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 9,442 | +259 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:02 | 9,183 | +181 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 9,002 | +79 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 8,923 | +56 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 8,867 | +21 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:53 | 8,846 | +32 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 8,814 | +52 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 8,762 | +34 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 8,728 | +19 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 8,709 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 8,710 | +27 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 8,683 | +44 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 8,639 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 8,649 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 8,643 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 8,638 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 8,638 | first reading |
68 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 68 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,747 reactions across 68 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,149 | 57.4% | |
| 👍 | 651 | 17.4% | |
| 🔥 | 441 | 11.8% | |
| 👏 | 245 | 6.54% | |
| 🙏 | 46 | 1.23% | |
| 🤔 | 36 | 0.961% | |
| ✍ | 28 | 0.747% | |
| 🤷♂ | 27 | 0.721% | |
| 😢 | 23 | 0.614% | |
| 🫡 | 17 | 0.454% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 0.427% | |
| 🤣 | 15 | 0.4% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 0.32% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 0.214% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 0.16% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 0.16% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.107% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 0.08% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.053% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 0.053% | |
| 7 further kinds | 10 | 0.267% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,747 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ChartTactix. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 68 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
I don't trade silver but price gave a very good entry confirmation from the 4hr IRL This is one entry we will be talking about in the bootcamp
❤28🔥11😱2
Silver just took out the its ERL So should we be expecting the same for gold? Orderflow will give us that answer
👍22❤13👨💻2✍1
The thing about the trading space is that people love flaunting Lambos, Rolexes, expensive watches and all these crazy lifestyles. And honestly, there's a reason for it. That's what attracts beginners. People see the lifestyle and automatically assume the person knows what they're doing. But don't judge them by what they drive or what they show you, because those things could be fake. Judge them by what they tea…
❤81👍20👏6🔥6🫡5💯2🤗2🥰2
PDF for Episode 3
❤23🔥9👏6👍4
Now this is how tuesday's candle closed, so what are we going to be expecting today? More bullishness If you're still confused about bias, then go and watch the episode 2 of bootcamp again
❤30🔥7👏2
So here is the thought process for the analysis After monday's candle closed, it left behind a daily IRL just below price, which means we should expect a daily IRL - ERL, but because price hasn't gotten back to the daily IRL, it was expected to do so So heading to the 4hr, we had a 4hr bearish fvg and a candle sweep, which is just price telling us that it will get back into the 4hr FVG first, push lower into the dai…
❤28🔥4👏1
This analysis was actually shared beforehand with my academy on monday
❤25👏4😢2
AUDUSD IRL - ERL ⌛️
❤22🔥8
https://x.com/Chart__Tactix/status/2091855241847136372?s=20
❤21🙏7🔥2
Are there traders here who can't identify an SMT Divergence? If you can't, react with this ❤️
❤92👍16🙏6🔥3
You mustn't trade every move but as a trader who isn't profitable yet Tape reading is really important, try to understand the reason behind most price movements and you'll see yourself getting better at understanding what price is likely to do
❤12🔥9👍5
An SMT Divergence Now that doesn't mean bullishness is assured at the moment So we need to wait for orderflow to the upside to confirm this
❤17👍12👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @ChartTactix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Did you?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Then once price gets to the Monthly FVG What do you do next?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ChartTactix” (@ChartTactix), 9,561 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChartTactix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.