Canal Natan Rufino pinned a photo

Channel
Canal Natan Rufino
@CanalNatanRufino
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
2,323subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001499362724 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CanalNatanRufino |
| Created | Between 1 May 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CanalNatanRufino |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 2,323 | -5 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 2,328 | -12 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 2,340 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 2,345 | -6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 09:02 | 2,351 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 2,357 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 2,367 | -7 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 2,374 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 2,376 | +6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 2,370 | +6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:09 | 2,364 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 2,366 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 2,367 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 2,365 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5m 36s
- Average length
- 5m 36s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
120 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 65 | 54.2% | |
| 👍 | 27 | 22.5% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 10.8% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 5.83% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 2.50% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 2.50% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.833% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.833% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
O holandês Dirck Volckertszoon Coornhert, (1522–1590), foi escritor, teólogo, filósofo, tradutor, político e artista — amplamente reconhecido como o “Pai da erudição renascentista holandesa”. Ele foi um dos primeiros e mais ferrenhos defensores da tolerância religiosa, opondo-se firmemente à execução de hereges. Coornhert era uma figura controversa que não se alinhava totalmente nem com católicos nem com reformadores…
❤4👏4
Signed Natan Rufino
UMA CRÍTICA PRÉ-MILENISTA AO MODELO AMILENISTA CUPOM DE DESCONTO: RUFINO2021 A principal discordância entre os dois modelos diz respeito ao reinado de mil anos de Cristo mencionado em Apocalipse 20. A interpretação pré-milenista defende intervalos de tempo entre eventos escatológicos essenciais descritos no Novo Testamento. Isso será explicado nesta obra. O livro esclarecerá as principais diferenças entre essa…
💊3🔥2👏1
Signed Natan Rufino
Gostei da citação de Miguel Serveto e do apóstolo Paulo. E os crentes apoiando essa patifaria, ou em cima do muro, pois são burros demais pra pensar!!
❤9🙏3👍1👏1
Signed Natan Rufino
Canal Natan Rufino pinned «"Todos os cristãos antes de Agostinho que chegaram a debater sobre destino e fé e que escreveram sobre as formas de predestinismo existentes na época, tenham sido elas originadas na filosofia estoica, ou associadas à crença de destino determinado pelos movimentos…»
"Todos os cristãos antes de Agostinho que chegaram a debater sobre destino e fé e que escreveram sobre as formas de predestinismo existentes na época, tenham sido elas originadas na filosofia estoica, ou associadas à crença de destino determinado pelos movimentos dos astros celestes, ou de origem supostamente cristã a partir das filosofias gnósticas, todos, sem exceção, se posicionaram veementemente contra o determin…
❤10🔥4
Signed Natan Rufino
ANJOS DA GUARDA, ENVIADOS PARA SERVIR
👏2
Signed Natan Rufino
Quero mesmo ver a briga de faca do povo quando esse livro for publicado... Vai sair antes de Romanos 9, pessoal. Aguardem... 🖖🏻♥️
👍16❤11🎉1🔥1
Signed Natan Rufino
Canal Natan Rufino pinned «MOISÉS MANDAVA MATAR, JESUS FAZ VIVER!»
MOISÉS MANDAVA MATAR, JESUS FAZ VIVER!
❤7
Signed Natan Rufino
Moisés mandava matar, Jesus faz viver!
❤6
Signed Natan Rufino
Canal Natan Rufino pinned «Dízimos e Ofertas...»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CanalNatanRufino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Canal Natan Rufino” (@CanalNatanRufino), 2,323 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CanalNatanRufino.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.