Channel
@CXRcases
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,956subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001465865915 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CXRcases |
| Description | New CXR Case Every Tuesdays |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CXRcases |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 11,956 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 11,958 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 11,959 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 11,959 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 2 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
366 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 194 | 53.0% | |
| ❤ | 149 | 40.7% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 3.01% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 1.09% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.82% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.82% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.546% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 366reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2024 to 31 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Two identical chest radiographs. This is an example of an air bronchogram caused by severe bilateral consolidation. The air bronchogram is marked in green on the inferior radiograph. (You can also see: endotracheal tube in situ, nasogastric tube in situ, ECG leads and large cannula in superior vena cava.) 🩻 @CXRcases
👍29❤20🔥2
Two identical chest radiographs. This is an example of an air bronchogram caused by severe bilateral consolidation. The air bronchogram is marked in green on the inferior radiograph. (You can also see: endotracheal tube in situ, nasogastric tube in situ, ECG leads and large cannula in superior vena cava.) 🩻 @CXRcases
❤25👍13🔥6
Air bronchogram It can appear when there is consolidation (e.g. pneumonia), collapse or pulmonary oedema in the surrounding alveoli. 🩻 @CXRcases
👍16❤4
Two identical chest radiographs showing left lower lobe consolidation. The patchy airspace shadowing corresponds to the left lower lobe and there is no loss of lung volume. We know the consolidation is in the left lower lobe as there is loss of definition of the left hemidiaphragm. The right radiograph shows the consolidation marked in green. 🩻 @CXRcases
👍15❤10🥰2
Two identical chest radiographs showing consolidation in the lingula. There is patchy airspace shadowing and no loss of lung volume. We know the consolidation is in the lingula as there is loss of the left heart border. The right radiograph shows the consolidation marked in green. 🩻 @CXRcases
👍14❤9
Two identical chest radiographs showing middle lobe and left lower lobe consolidation. The patchy airspace shadowing corresponds to the middle lobe and left lower lobe and there is no loss of lung volume. We know the consolidation is in the middle lobe as there is loss of the right heart border and the superior border is the horizontal fissure. We know the consolidation is in the left lower lobe as there is loss of d…
👍16❤9
Two identical chest radiographs showing middle lobe consolidation. The patchy airspace shadowing corresponds to the middle lobe and there is no loss of lung volume. We know the consolidation is in the middle lobe as there is loss of the right heart border and the superior border is the horizontal fissure. The right radiograph shows the consolidation marked in green. 🩻@CXRcases
👍11❤9
Two identical chest radiographs showing right upper lobe consolidation with sparing of the apical segment. The patchy airspace shadowing corresponds to the right upper lobe and there is no loss of lung volume. The right radiograph shows the consolidation marked in green. 🩻@CXRcases
👍9❤7
Two identical chest radiographs showing consolidation. There is consolidation in both lungs with moderate sparing of the apical segment of the right upper lobe (seen as darker than the rest). There is patchy airspace shadowing, no loss of lung volume and if you look carefully, you can see air bronchograms in both lungs. The right radiograph shows the consolidation marked in green. (You can also see: endotracheal tube…
👍10🙏4❤3🔥2
Consolidation/Airspace shadowing 🔴 Patchy shadowing : non - uniform shadowing and the border is not well demarcated. 🔴 Lobar or segmental density : the density should correspond anatomically to a lobe or lung segment. 🔴 Air bronchogram: the presence of an air bronchogram would confirm that the density (fluid/pus) was in the alveoli and not the larger airways. Bronchial breathing is the clinical equivalent of the air …
👍13
Two identical chest radiographs showing widening of the carinal angle. The carinal angle is greater than 100 ° . The right radiograph shows the trachea, right mainstem bronchus and left mainstem bronchus marked in blue. 🩻 @CXRcases
❤16👍1🔥1
Carinal angle Normally the angle is between 40 ° and 100 ° . An increase in the carinal angle is an indirect sign of pathology in the heart, mediastinum or lungs. • sub - carinal mass (a mass below the carina, e.g. bronchial carcinoma, hiatal hernia) • left atrial enlargement , cardiomegaly or a pericardial effusion • right or left upper lobe collapse (pulling the mainstem bronchus upwards). 🩻 @CXRcases
👍7❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @CXRcases. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CXR (Chest X-Ray) Cases” (@CXRcases), 11,956 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CXRcases.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.