Channel
@CTMODS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,462subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002159564209 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CTMODS |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CTMODS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 1,462 | +13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 1,449 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 1,449 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 851 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
9 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 55.6% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟 秋辞互推 接纳各种小频道 请不要删除此信息否则取消互推资格 1. 周防有希频道\[安装包置顶\](https://t.me/ZFYXMODD) 2. 少萝 强奸 学生妹 福利姬 黑丝 白丝 整合 3. AS cheat MOD 🇨🇳 4\.5 4. RKR直装官方频道 5. AI Pulse 日报 6. 王者荣耀小土豆直装 7. 灯枣\_MOD官方主频道🇨🇳 8. 和泉纱雾安装包频道 9. 无缘公益项目频道 10. 和泉纱雾 · 主频道 11. CC网络平台【BOT】 12. 秋小鹤八级号【官方正版】 13. 凡人刃 泛滥 14. 时代的眼泪 15. 苏秋辞导航频道 📌 共 51 个频道加入互推 📄 第 1/4 页
Signed QCHTBOT
致全体绿玩的一封信： 外挂是工具，开挂是手段，手段是能力，作弊是智慧。没挂就别叫，有挂就得开，开挂已是无敌路，何须再用智商补。开挂有路你不走，绿玩无门你自来投。外挂只是最强的外设，强者总会被针对。练枪是小径，自瞄是大道，意识会出错，透视秒全场，不要问为什么开挂，因为你已经习惯愚蠢。开挂者人均天资聪颖，因为真正的高手，都善于走捷径，我们在熙熙攘攘的生活中享受外挂，当绿玩被无情击败，才会明白，他们离成功只差一张板子。苦海无涯回头是挂，外挂就是最踏实的那条路，趁现在开挂还来得及。 当你练习了一辈子，站在山巅，才发现，外挂在对着你笑。
💩1
Signed 胆寒【力争上游】
立秋快乐
Signed 青 川（直奔主题）
那你常情着吧，我陪我对象
🤣1
Signed 屿川 𝓨𝓾 𝓒𝓱𝓾𝓪𝓷
人之常情
👍2
Signed 青 川（直奔主题）
还在鸽吗
Signed 屿川 𝓨𝓾 𝓒𝓱𝓾𝓪𝓷
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed 屿川 𝓨𝓾 𝓒𝓱𝓾𝓪𝓷
脸书账号购买链接低价好用 https://shop.368fk.cn/shop/xinghenb666
Signed 星 河
有没有人要虚拟主机，5块钱低价出了，可制作网站 @p333333333p
👍1
Signed 星 河
梦晚舟低价账号 和平无限授权 PUBG八级号 TG号 全网价格最低，售后全天在线 💰手续费，无需手续费，最低价格 没有任何前置要求，无法使用可换，可补，任何问联系售后 购买链接 http://698fk.cn/Y9Jau
Signed 星 河
梦晚舟低价账号 和平无限授权 PUBG八级号 TG号 全网价格最低，售后全天在线 💰手续费，无需手续费，最低价格 没有任何前置要求，无法使用可换，可补，任何问联系售后 购买链接 http://698fk.cn/Y9Jau
👍1
Signed 星 河
解双向速来 @xhsxnbnbbot 前5位1元，后面的2元
Signed 星 河
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @CTMODS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,101,028 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@CTMODS named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“刺痛公益直装” (@CTMODS), 1,462 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CTMODS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.