7 measurements spanning 18 days, net +566. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,439–6,175 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 11:34
6,090
+144
23 Aug 2026, 06:06
5,946
+135
20 Aug 2026, 01:02
5,811
+145
16 Aug 2026, 14:19
5,666
+20
11 Aug 2026, 22:02
5,646
+101
9 Aug 2026, 02:22
5,545
+21
8 Aug 2026, 03:18
5,524
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.37%
avg views ÷ 6,090 subscribers
Avg views / post
449
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
7 (6 August 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
3,143
Reactions total
73
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
29m 38s
Average length
7m 25s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
73 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
28
38.4%
❤🔥
19
26.0%
❤
11
15.1%
⚡
7
9.59%
💘
7
9.59%
🥰
1
1.37%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#叫兽 - #会员花絮 #葡萄 #道家小僵尸[73P1V-1.7GB]
#摄影师 #精选 未流出资源
知名摄影师 #铁手叫兽 独家掌镜，会员限定花絮首曝。
出境模特 #葡萄 化身道家小僵尸，古装之下暗藏极致反差——清纯面容与幽暗夜拍交织，每一帧都透着欲说还休的张力。
雪肌在暗光中若隐若现，衣袂半掩曲线的起伏，眼神像从旧画里探出的妖，勾魂却不落俗。
这套未流出资源，尺度边缘刚好卡在喉头，越看越上头，是社群老粉才配拥有的私藏。
别再隔着屏幕眼馋了——进群，才能看见那缕小僵尸的呼吸。
Shot by the famed #铁手叫兽, this members-only extra has never leaked.
#葡萄 plays a Taoist zombie girl, all innocence wrapped in ancient robes—yet the night-shot mood flips every gl…
#饭堂 - 26-8 #LoveLive #近江和服[40P2V-1GB]
#精选 未流出资源
和服领口不经意滑落的弧度，藏着若隐若现的锁骨线条。腰封收紧，勾勒出只属于成人的曼妙曲线——每一次俯身，都像在夜色里拆开一封未写完的情书。
暗光、近景、微微酡红的耳根…这不是公开场合能看到的视角。精选未流出资源，仅向内部会员开放，错过即失效。
The faint slip of fabric, the curve of a waist that could only exist in a private frame. This is the unreleased cut — for members only.
#叫兽 - #会员花絮 #天使小女仆[23P1V-1.83GB]
#精选 #摄影师 未流出资源
知名摄影师 #铁手叫兽 掌镜，神秘模特化身天使与女仆的双重幻梦。
白色蕾丝勾勒腰线，裙摆下若有若无的阴影，是镜头前最撩人的伏笔。
回眸眼神带着一丝羞涩与挑逗，每一帧都在无限逼近私享的边界。
这套「会员花絮」为社群限定流出，未公开原片，越看得越深，越难抽离。
A hidden angel in maid's attire—lace, curves, and that teasing glance. Members-only outtakes, never released elsewhere. Enter and lose yourself.
#蘑菇头 - #会员花絮 #连体泳衣[55P-240MB]
#摄影师 #精选 未流出资源
#蘑菇头 泳衣下的曲线，每一帧都在撩拨视线。
连体剪裁勒出腰臀比例，暗光里皮肤泛着柔润光泽。
她侧身回眸那一下，像隔着屏幕在邀请你靠近。
这组是会员花絮里的私藏片段，未流出资源，只在社群小范围放送。
想看完整体验？进群解锁，别等它沉底。
#MushroomHead #MembersOnly #OnePieceSwimsuit
Every curve tells a story, every glance pulls you in.
Behind-the-scenes intimate cuts, not meant for the public eye.
Join the club before this disappears.
👍4❤🔥2⚡1❤1💘1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @COSV5_VIP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 982,622 of 1,605,487entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“COSV5_VIP” (@COSV5_VIP), 6,090 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/COSV5_VIP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
