ββSkip watching from the public group
π4π3π₯3β€βπ₯2π―2β€1π1π€©1

Channel
@CHEN_WHALES_CALL
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
3,012subscribers
-151 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002327650877 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CHEN_WHALES_CALL |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CHEN_WHALES_CALL |
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 13:19 | 3,012 | -75 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 10:59 | 3,087 | -203 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 3,290 | -173 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 3,463 | +1,395 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 2,068 | -87 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:28 | 2,155 | -94 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 2,249 | -104 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 2,353 | -76 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 2,429 | -71 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 2,500 | -157 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 2,657 | -192 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 2,849 | -120 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 2,969 | -149 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 3,118 | -45 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 3,163 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 3,163 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
579 reactions across 23 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 91 | 15.7% | |
| π₯ | 72 | 12.4% | |
| π₯° | 66 | 11.4% | |
| π― | 65 | 11.2% | |
| π | 62 | 10.7% | |
| π | 61 | 10.5% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 52 | 8.98% | |
| π€© | 52 | 8.98% | |
| π | 43 | 7.43% | |
| π | 13 | 2.25% | |
| customΒ 5945057116527006335 | 2 | 0.345% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 579 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ββSkip watching from the public group
π4π3π₯3β€βπ₯2π―2β€1π1π€©1
Whoa @NEXUSVlP , HTZ just went from pocket change to a trillionβdollar spaceship in 14 hoursβ118x the hype! β $HTZ β π
β€4π₯3π3π2π1π―1π€©1π₯°1
Wow, FRIEND went from 81K to 915K in a weekβtalk about a quantum leap, Morty would be jealous! β $FRIEND β π
π5π€©3β€2β€βπ₯2π―1π₯1π₯°1π1
π¦ Share on π and tag @RickBurpBot β΄οΈ TIP: Trade on Axiom
π―7π6β€5π5β€βπ₯4π3π€©3π₯°3
Wow, NOSFERATU just went from a sleepy 33.2K to a monstrous 1.1M in 7 hoursβtalk about a 34x vampire bite! β $NOSFERATU β π
β€33π31β€βπ₯25π―25π₯°25π25π₯22π€©22
π¦ Share on π and tag @RickBurpBot π₯ NEW: Public Leaderboard with /hubrank on
π₯5β€3π₯°3β€βπ₯2π2π€©2π2π―1
π¦ Share on π and tag @RickBurpBot π₯ NEW: Public Leaderboard with /hubrank on
β€5π€©4π―3π2π₯2β€βπ₯1π1π1
Wow, LOOT went from pocket change to a 320k partyβ24x the hype and still no pizza delivery! β $LOOT β π
π4π―3π₯3β€2π2β€βπ₯1π1π€©1
Wow, ARDAY just went from pocket change to interdimensional blingβ15.6x gain in 4 hours! π β $ARDAY β π
π1π1π₯°1
$70 β $1,477 on $CATECOIN ππ₯ Missed this one? DM @NEXUSVlP for the next VIP call.
β€6π₯°6π€©3π2π2π1π₯1
21.1x done from $CATECOIN The private chat is open Dm to join @NEXUSVlP
π₯4π€©4β€2β€βπ₯1π1π1π―1π₯°1
$CATECOIN is now at 803.92k LFG π€©
β€2π1π₯°1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @CHEN_WHALES_CALL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππππ ππ§ππ£π© 1000ππ²β (@CHEN_WHALES_CALL), 3,012 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CHEN_WHALES_CALL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.