Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CEVAT'S KOLLOIDE & FREQUENZEN❤️

Channel

CEVAT'S KOLLOIDE & FREQUENZEN❤️

@CEVATSKOLLOIDEFREQUENZEN

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,917subscribers

+81 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002641322533
TypeChannel
Username@CEVATSKOLLOIDEFREQUENZEN
Description@Cosifri Dieser Kanal dient ausschließlich der sachlichen Information zu technischen, physikalischen und theoretischen Aspekten. Er ist kein Gesundheits-, Therapie- oder Beratungsangebot.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CEVATSKOLLOIDEFREQUENZEN

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@CEVATSKOLLOIDEFREQUENZEN/12927 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTC@KoloidaleMetallefrexuenzen/462595 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTC1.00under a minute
@CEVATSKOLLOIDEFREQUENZEN/12929 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTC@KoloidaleMetallefrexuenzen/462615 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTC1.00under a minute
@CEVATSKOLLOIDEFREQUENZEN/12930 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 21:55 UTC@KoloidaleMetallefrexuenzen/462625 Aug 2026, 21:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@Tierheimesind/93625 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTC@CEVATSKOLLOIDEFREQUENZEN/12929 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 21:53 UTC1.00under a minute
@Tierheimesind/93635 Aug 2026, 21:55 UTC@CEVATSKOLLOIDEFREQUENZEN/12930 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 21:55 UTC1.00under a minute
@CEVATSKOLLOIDEFREQUENZEN/12939 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 22:10 UTC@Tierheimesind/93645 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC1.004 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@KoloidaleMetallefrexuenzen18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (126)
@Tierheimesind6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.5 hourseven
@KOLLOIDEFREXUENZENTIERE8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 minutesthis entry (53)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @Tierheimesind. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

13,83613,91713,876.56 August 2026 — 13,836 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,836 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,848 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,862 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,883 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,885 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,878 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,883 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,889 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,898 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,896 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,917 subscribers6 August 202619 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 14 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,824–13,929 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 15:2413,917+21
18 Aug 2026, 14:4813,896-2
16 Aug 2026, 02:4813,898+9
13 Aug 2026, 03:5913,889+6
12 Aug 2026, 01:3213,883+5
11 Aug 2026, 02:3613,878-7
10 Aug 2026, 04:2513,885+2
9 Aug 2026, 07:5413,883+21
8 Aug 2026, 05:5113,862+14
7 Aug 2026, 07:2213,848+12
6 Aug 2026, 03:0013,836no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:5313,836first reading

Engagement

266 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.54%
avg views ÷ 13,917 subscribers
Avg views / post
493
266 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
266
of 266 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held266 (5 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total131,218
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,090
Videos
3,110
Links
4,510

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
17h 06m
Average length
10m 10s

Measured directly from 101 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC362 viewsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @KoloidaleMetallefrexuenzenVideo

Husky Heulerei Schlaflieder Baby Emma verwandelte Hund Berührende Geschichte Tier-Mensch-Bindung Beschützer Instinkt Liebe 🙏❤️ Eine unglaubliche Geschichte über Sturm den Husky, der seine dramatischen Heulkonzerte in sanfte Schlaflieder verwandelte, als Baby Emma nach Hause kam 🙏❤️ Seht, wie aus einem wilden, aufmerksamkeitssuchenden Hund der liebevollste Babysitter wurde, der Emma beschützt und tröstet 🙏❤️ Eine

19 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC345 viewsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @ANLEITUNGKOLLOIDEN

TARA @TaRaksasiri KANN EUCH SCHWEIZER BEI DEN BESTELLUNGEN BEHILFLICH SEIN ❤️ SIE HAT MEIN VERTRAUEN ❤️LG EUER CEVAT ❤️

19 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC349 viewsread 19 August 2026

Hallo lieber Herr Cevat Ich bin durch Salvatore Russo meinen Naturarzt in der Schweiz auf Sie aufmerksam geworden. Ich mache schon länger Kollodiales Silber selber. Herr Russo sagte mir kürzlich dass Ihr Generator und ihre Stäbe das Set am besten wären. Er benutzt es regelmässig. Können Sie mir bitte sagen wie ich in der Schweiz zu diesen Produkten komme? Ich wäre auch sehr dankbar, wenn ich in die Telegrammgruppe au

19 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC627 viewsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @KoloidaleMetallefrexuenzen

https://youtu.be/CFR5PysXrXs?is=ZfewZsHyhJBagwTR VON ❤️ ZU ❤️ EUER CEVAT ❤️ @GRUPPE_KOLLOIDALES_SILBER ❤️

19 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC100 viewsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @KoloidaleMetallefrexuenzenPhoto

☀️🏆 Der große Sommer Wettbewerb 2026 🏆☀️ Liebe Freunde, es ist soweit. Wir starten unseren großen Sommer Wettbewerb 2026 und diesmal gibt es richtig etwas zu gewinnen! 🎉 Ich möchte eure persönlichen Erfahrungen und Erfolgsberichte hören. Wenn ihr mit unseren Kolloiden oder Frequenzgenerator F528 besondere Erfahrungen gemacht habt, schickt mir eure Geschichte ganz einfach als Sprachnachricht auf Telegram an @Cosif

19 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC65 viewsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @FRAGEUNDANTWORTENVoice message

KEY KOLLOIDE GMBH KREFELDERSTR 562 41066 MÖNCHENGLADBACH [email protected] VON ❤️ ZU ❤️ EUER CEVAT ❤️ @GRUPPE_KOLLOIDALES_SILBER ❤️

19 Aug 2026, 06:56 UTC62 viewsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @ANLEITUNGKOLLOIDENVoice message

KEY KOLLOIDE GMBH KREFELDERSTR 562 41066 MÖNCHENGLADBACH [email protected] VON ❤️ ZU ❤️ EUER CEVAT ❤️ @GRUPPE_KOLLOIDALES_SILBER ❤️

19 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC≈2,130 viewsread 19 August 2026
Video

5 einfache Detox Tipps zum Leber entgiften ❤️ Unsere Leber ist das Entgiftungsorgan NR.1. Angesichts der Belastungen, denen unser Körper heutzutage vielfach ausgesetzt ist, ist eine Leberreinigung die ideale Maßnahme um Fettleber Symptome vorzubeugen und die Leber gesund zu halten. Die 5 Schritte deine Leber natürlich zu entgiften sind 🍃 1. Entferne toxische Lebensmittel aus deiner Ernährung 2. Trinke mehr rohe Ge

19 Aug 2026, 06:44 UTC343 viewsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @TierheimesindVideo

Anderen Gutes zu tun ist das Fundament der Goldenen Regel, die in fast allen Kulturen und Religionen als moralischer Kompass gilt 🙏❤️ Ob in der Bibel „Alles, was ihr wollt, dass euch die Menschen tun, das tut auch ihnen“ 🙏❤️ Bei Konfuzius oder im Islam – der Kern bleibt gleich: Behandle deine Mitmenschen so, wie du selbst behandelt werden möchtest 🙏❤️ Quelle Von ❤️ zu ❤️ Euer Cevat @GRUPPE_KOLLOIDALES_SILBER

19 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC≈1,730 viewsread 19 August 2026

Hallo lieber Cevat! Und wieder hat uns der Zaubertrank (so nennen meine Kinder das kolloidale Silber 😅) uns gerettet! Meine 8jährige Tochter hatte Schalach, bzw. alle Anzeichen (eine fiese Mandelentzündung, Fieber, gerötete Wangen, Ausschlag, Himbeerzunge). Sie gurgelte und trank ab letztes Wochenende 6-8mal täglich ein Schnapsglas voll. Wir mussten allerdings dann doch zum Arzt, weil die Schule einen Nachweis wollte

Showing the 12 most recent of 266 posts we hold for @CEVATSKOLLOIDEFREQUENZEN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 27,227 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CEVAT'S KOLLOIDE & FREQUENZEN❤️” (@CEVATSKOLLOIDEFREQUENZEN), 13,917 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CEVATSKOLLOIDEFREQUENZEN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.