Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 光之国ㅎ商家榜

Channel

光之国ㅎ商家榜

@CCTVoooo1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,424subscribers

+101 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004467927552
TypeChannel
Username@CCTVoooo1
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 30 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 November 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CCTVoooo1

Growth

3,3233,4243,373.53 November 2026 — 3,323 subscribers3 November 2026 — 3,326 subscribers6 November 2026 — 3,375 subscribers9 November 2026 — 3,424 subscribers3 November 20269 November 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +101. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,308–3,439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 17:363,424+49
6 Nov 2026, 07:513,375+49
3 Nov 2026, 17:383,326+3
3 Nov 2026, 10:223,323first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 11 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.4%
avg views ÷ 3,424 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,240
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.092%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held10 (11 October 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total11,200
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 10:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 08s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

30 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1033.3%
👏1033.3%
👍930.0%
🔥13.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 October 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (60.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

22 Oct 2026, 10:54 UTC≈2,220 views0 reactionsread 3 November 2026

🚨 【Telegram账号安全提醒】 近期频繁出现飞机账号被盗事件!为保障各位老板的账号及资金安全,请务必检查以下设置! 🔐 账号与隐私安全 • 语言:切换【简体中文】 • 两步验证:修改密码,邮箱换绑本人邮箱 • 手机号码、最后上线时间:【全部隐藏】 • 通话、群组邀请:【仅限我的联系人】 • 登录设备:踢出陌生设备,新设备受限可24小时后重试 📵 数据与存储 • 自动下载媒体文件:【全部关闭】 • 移动数据、Wi-Fi:【关闭自动下载】 ⚠️ 防盗提醒 • 非工作链接、陌生文件及安装包不要乱点! • 登录验证码、二次密码绝不外泄! • 涉及资金及收款地址变更,务必二次核实! • 建议拉一个小号在对接群内! 请各位老板务必重视,及时完成安全设置,避免造成不必要的损失! 🛡 安全第一,防范于未然! 投稿:@mishuuuooobot

22 Oct 2026, 00:40 UTC≈2,210 views1 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

姐妹们有心了 投稿: @mishuuuooobot

❤1

16 Oct 2026, 22:43 UTC≈2,910 views6 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

【投稿】 1、 一个普通狼友怎么可能对老师熟悉 熟悉到记得老师几月份上榜 2、 这位狼友的说的话带有要洗白老师的语气 老师干你屁事啊 ? 明明是狼友被骗了 好吗? 你帮老师说什么话 你给老师写好评了啊? 3、我没有在那个什么牛马群里面 这位狼友经常聊天吗? 4、21:00说有了解过还骂老师骗子 22:00又说出击过 没给定金 ? 你到底是骂她?还是出击过啊? 再多说一句私人恩怨 我作为一个普通狼友简简单单说一句 为什么什么奇葩事情都跟你们牛马垃圾群有关系啊? 多多少少沾点料是吗? 不是我骂你垃圾群 我大几千块钱 油费都是在你群去的 我草泥马逼 不是坑就是下菜 和群没关系 我一开始以为的是这么多人 怎么可能管的过来 直到我当初吐槽个老师 把我禁言了? 我cnm 你有病吗? 我的钱不是钱吗? 我花钱踩坑了 我不能吐槽一下? 你们作为一个平台 怎么不靠谱? 再吐槽一个 我气一下就上来了 兄弟…

👍4❤1👏1

16 Oct 2026, 15:53 UTC≈2,450 views2 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

来自狼友避雷投稿: 曾经的果酱(@xb33t)现在叫王思思(@AFD6543)的代聊巨他妈煞笔。雷点一:排课非常没水平,说好的时间让狼友在楼下站了一个多小时,询问后也不回复;雷点二:压榨妹妹到了极致,据了解这个妹妹白天上班晚上兼职,代聊要求妹妹每天19点开课到凌晨4点,哪怕一天就一两单也必须到点下班,抽水抽一半,一单妹妹到手就250块。雷点三:欺熟,该狼友比较喜欢这个妹妹,去过三四次了,而且还尽心尽力写好评,向熟人推荐,代聊觉着可以随便拿捏,动不动就罚站。 昆明情报局提示:妹妹本身挺好的,在这样被极致压榨的情况下,服务没有问题。但是这个代聊一没水平二没道德,大家擦亮眼睛,坚决抵制此类傻逼中介,共同维护市场生态!

❤2

14 Oct 2026, 04:41 UTC≈2,590 views0 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

情报局 此频道发布内容 投稿/吃瓜/吐槽/黑榜/严打/差评 💥支持狼友投稿 频道属于大家 https://t.me/CCTVoooo1

14 Oct 2026, 04:38 UTC≈2,620 views5 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

寻人启事 全网找此人 ——— 事发地点:昆明 事发原因:不明 这位狼友得思想有点黑暗了哈 做群都不容易 为什么要说出这种话? 这是魔法攻击吗? 你可能没做过群 不知道做群的幸苦 很累 希望将心比心 不要给人刷僵尸粉 如果有什么做的不对 我已经向你私信发过道歉信息 你也已读 希望你大人有大量 不要跟我一般见识 —————谢谢

👍2❤1👏1🔥1

12 Oct 2026, 14:37 UTC≈2,380 views4 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

某个奇怪的东西和老师的对话……嗯,也是想瞎了心了

👏3👍1

12 Oct 2026, 10:56 UTC≈2,440 views11 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

狼友投稿 —— 最近收到大量 狼友和ls 对于隔壁牛马群的投稿 总结 : 垃圾群 不靠谱 狼友不找 老师上榜等于浪费钱 - 当个瓜吃 - 欢迎狼友老师继续投稿

👏5❤4👍2

11 Oct 2026, 05:38 UTC≈2,430 views1 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Video

嗯,以后出击记得带包跳跳糖

❤1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @CCTVoooo1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“光之国ㅎ商家榜” (@CCTVoooo1), 3,424 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CCTVoooo1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.