Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Never|mind

Channel

Never|mind

@ButNothingHappened

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,030subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001061697977
TypeChannel
Username@ButNothingHappened
Created10 May 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ButNothingHappened

Growth

1,0301,0311,030.55 August 2026 — 1,030 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,030 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,031 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,030 subscribers5 August 202618 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 13 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,030–1,031 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 22:071,030-1
9 Aug 2026, 17:411,031+1
6 Aug 2026, 13:031,030no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:061,030first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.0%
avg views ÷ 1,030 subscribers
Avg views / post
248
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 March 20264 August 2026)
Views total495
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1431.8%
818.2%
🤡715.9%
😢613.6%
😁49.09%
🎉24.55%
😈12.27%
😭12.27%
🤯12.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 01:20 UTC166 viewsread 6 August 2026

#今日份教训 家用UV打印机(任意表面)是个大坑 它和3D打印机不同的是维护成本 如果不是连续使用很容易堵头 而且耗材价格很贵,清洗流程也耗墨水 目前基本上都是爱普生方案打包 体验差不说,有些软件里面AI识别打印位置居然还要单独买Token 大开眼界🤡 淘宝上面那些低于五位数价格的机器都是定金价格 在国内完全没必要买,不如直接传设计图要成品 本来还想看看能不能在美国搞一台玩玩 算下来耗材开一次机的价格都要几刀的成本直接让我死心 via NeverBehave https://mastodon.social/@neverbehave/117034381752942649

28 Jul 2026, 09:20 UTC329 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

噢我的老天爷 在超市停车场被别人租来的车撞到 而且刚刚才修完一个保修内的问题 Verizon网络一坨狗屎 它能给两个不同的路由器上一样的公网IP 捐给别人的40G Juniper交换机被说太吵 每天上班无聊到只想刷短视频 看组之间同事打太极真的想死🫠 以后只想去初创呆着了 年少无知配出来的宿主机储存架构虽然寿命还剩一半 但是已经开始报错而且没办法不停机更换 业务无线电考试都换题目了还没考 🤡算了,出去玩了,爱咋滴咋滴

😢6😈1😭1

26 Jul 2026, 02:40 UTC378 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

你的情绪并不是毫无来由,它们都是在给你传递信息。 焦虑,说明你把注意力放在了一个自己无法控制的未来。 抑郁,说明你困在了一段无法改变的过去。 愤怒,说明你的边界被侵犯了。 愧疚,说明你的行为和自己的价值观不一致。 不要把情绪当成需要消灭的问题,试着把它们当成一种信息,因为它们只是想告诉你一些事情。 关于动力,有一件事你需要知道,动力本质上只是一种感觉,而感觉都是暂时的,你不能依赖感觉。真正有用的,是习惯。 你每天所做的大约40%的事情其实都是靠自动化的习惯完成的。 所以,与其等待灵感,不如建立一套属于自己的系统。 别再让过去决定你的未来,试着建立新的行为模式,试着建立新的有益于你生活的行为模式。 15岁的你不应该决定30岁的你是谁,当时的你没有现在的阅历,也没有现在拥有的信息。 如果一个人轻易就能触发你的情绪,很多时候,问题并不在对方,那是一面镜子,它们只是碰到了你内心还没愈合的伤口,你无法控制别人,也无法控制结果,

👍72

23 Jul 2026, 02:20 UTC428 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#今日份教训 公司IT把Mac防火墙锁定全部拦截 但没想到苹果这个防火墙居然是Application Level的(socketfilterfw) 这导致本地虚拟机访问本地web开发会被Block 而且Block的结果是Empty Response 而不是超时或者RST 直到后面开了个Python脚本抓了一下才发现为啥能接到请求但是invalid handle,还以为dev server有啥问题🤡 然后Debug的问题是因为网页在某个Linux版本下有错位的问题 死活复现不了,想开虚拟机完整模拟一下,结果怎么也连不上本地开发环境 最后解决的办法是反向ssh映射本地端口到虚拟机里面🤡 然后发现好像可能是旧版本浏览器才有这个问题 怎么还有同事在用3年前的版本🤯 哦是Linux,管不到更新也很正常🤡 又浪费一天🤡 via NeverBehave https://mastodon.social/@neverbehave/11

21 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC369 viewsread 6 August 2026

#今日份教训 终于把3年前在沃尔玛买的清仓价充电桩 含泪装在别人家车库的时候🤡 我们湾区圣何塞是这样的:在家冲电的价格甚至不如外面快充🥹 花这个钱都不知道能多充多少电了🫠 via NeverBehave https://mastodon.social/@neverbehave/116956934387007076

21 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC318 viewsread 6 August 2026

#今日份教训 终究还是抵抗不了生理上产生的职业倦怠 必须要请假出去玩一玩了🙃 最近做啥都抬不起精神以前还不太理解年假到底是为了什么 以前上学不也是千篇一律的生活 然后意识到上班没有寒暑假😭 via NeverBehave https://mastodon.social/@neverbehave/116956894388086526

29 Jun 2026, 16:34 UTC551 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

聚会上带长枪短炮的都好会拍😁 https://www.furtrack.com/p/2012189 🐺 @Sterling_NW 📷 @MeowMatchaCat #fursuit via NeverBehave https://mastodon.social/@neverbehave/116832726313526569

2

17 Jun 2026, 06:25 UTC673 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#今日份教训 1. 别拿Mikrotik CCR跑BGP 2. Unifi 5G Max eSIM初始化必须要管理器有直接的互联网,不能用实体卡的网 这两个事情凑一块也太离谱了: Unifi 5G Max+Gateway是备用管理网,之前突然提示eSIM拒绝连接,以为是临时的,没理会 然后突然主路由也炸了,导致整个站点都离线了 Mikrotik这个BGP炸了还是炸一半,我后面意识到BGP状态显示不出来才意识到好像是服务出问题 它也不会自动尝试恢复,不太能理解🫠 Unifi 5G里面有两个卡,备用卡有流量限制,临时提升以后想重新先把备用网恢复,结果发现5G Max要求必须控制器有非备份网的网络连接才能初始化 🤡因为初始化可能要切换会断网 🤡🤡手边只有一个USB网卡,只能在电脑插上Unifi Gateway配置和手机热点有线共享网络之间切换 🤡🤡🤡别用mikrotik的路由器干BGP via NeverBehave htt

1

15 Jun 2026, 17:20 UTC555 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

#fursuit https://x.com/99daley/status/2066441146776379588 https://x.com/99daley/status/2064329617201373351 via NeverBehave https://mastodon.social/@neverbehave/116755256611368942

2

24 May 2026, 12:20 UTC758 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#今日份教训 每个人都应该准备一些1~8G USB2.0的U盘 你保不准什么时候会遇到一些东西 尝试做个盘 然后发现 容量大了卡住/不读 3.0卡死/不读 不只是电脑,路由器交换机的Uboot对现代大容量U盘支持都不好 当你看到你周围有人随身带着2.0的U盘:别笑,他可能真的在机房里面救过人一命🥹 via NeverBehave https://mastodon.social/@neverbehave/116629191757197775

👍7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ButNothingHappened. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,244,063 of 1,603,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Never|mind” (@ButNothingHappened), 1,030 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ButNothingHappened.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.