Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bogdan & Xena

Channel

Bogdan & Xena

@Bogdan_and_Xena

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

118,885subscribers

-1,740 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002223352834
TypeChannel
Username@Bogdan_and_Xena
DescriptionWhy Web3 projects win, and what wins next. На русском 👉 @Bogdan_and_Xena_ru
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bogdan_and_Xena

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

118,885120,625119,7557 August 2026 — 120,625 subscribers8 August 2026 — 120,533 subscribers9 August 2026 — 120,357 subscribers10 August 2026 — 120,168 subscribers11 August 2026 — 119,958 subscribers12 August 2026 — 119,782 subscribers13 August 2026 — 119,605 subscribers14 August 2026 — 119,424 subscribers16 August 2026 — 119,260 subscribers17 August 2026 — 119,035 subscribers18 August 2026 — 118,885 subscribers7 August 202618 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net -1,740. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 118,624–120,886 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 10:12118,885-150
17 Aug 2026, 12:23119,035-225
16 Aug 2026, 02:23119,260-164
14 Aug 2026, 14:36119,424-181
13 Aug 2026, 08:17119,605-177
12 Aug 2026, 06:44119,782-176
11 Aug 2026, 06:16119,958-210
10 Aug 2026, 06:48120,168-189
9 Aug 2026, 06:41120,357-176
8 Aug 2026, 06:17120,533-92
7 Aug 2026, 12:45120,625first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 13 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.429%
avg views ÷ 118,885 subscribers
Avg views / post
511
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held30 (13 May 202618 August 2026)
Views total12,765
Reactions total329
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
72
Videos
20
Links
33

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

375 reactions across 27 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12533.3%
🔥11831.5%
4211.2%
👀215.60%
👏154.00%
🙊102.67%
71.87%
😁71.87%
🙈71.87%
🏆30.8%
👌30.8%
🗿30.8%
👻20.533%
💊20.533%
🤔20.533%
🤷‍♂20.533%
🍌10.267%
💯10.267%
😢10.267%
🤓10.267%
2 further kinds20.533%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 375reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC61 views7 reactionsread 18 August 2026

23/50. Where did the whole idea of giving people tokens for using a product even come from? A lot of it goes back to Compound. Imagine launching a new crypto product. Nobody knows you, there’s barely any money in it, and users aren’t showing up. Then someone has a brilliant idea: “Why don’t we just give people tokens for using it?” Sounds a little like a bribe. In 2020, it turned out this could become an entire indu

👍3🙈2👀1🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC164 views11 reactionsread 18 August 2026

22/50. Christie’s sold a JPEG for $69 million. And suddenly, NFTs became serious business. In early 2021, NFTs still looked like a strange toy for crypto enthusiasts. You could buy a digital image that anyone could open, save, and send to a friend. So why would anyone pay for it? The answer came in February 2021, when Christie’s put a piece by Beeple up for auction. It was a digital collage made from 5,000 images t

👍4🔥4👀2🙊1

16 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC220 views14 reactionsread 18 August 2026

21/50. Axie Infinity paid players more than minimum wage. Then everything collapsed. In 2021, a small Vietnamese studio turned a monster-battling game into a global phenomenon. During the lockdowns in the Philippines, thousands of people spent hours playing Axie Infinity and earned real money for it. In July 2021, CoinGecko estimated that an active player could earn around $1,665 per month. For many, this was no lon

👍5🔥4👀31💊1

15 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC223 views13 reactionsread 18 August 2026

20/50. Solana lost 96% of its value, was declared dead and came back with a dog meme. When FTX collapsed in late 2022, Solana was one of its biggest casualties. FTX and Alameda were deeply connected to the Solana ecosystem, and after the collapse, SOL lost roughly 96% from its peak. Crypto Twitter was already writing the obituary. Many people assumed the network was finished. Then came a Christmas gift. The communi

👍5🔥42👀1🙈1

14 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC218 views12 reactionsread 18 August 2026

19/50. HODL was invented by a drunk forum user at 3 a.m., and then the word became the language of an entire industry. In December 2013, a forum user wrote a long, emotional post about why he was not going to sell his Bitcoin during a crash. At one point, he meant to write HOLD, but accidentally typed HODL instead. The mistake should have remained just a mistake, but the crypto community quickly adopted it. HODL be

👍4🔥4👀3🙊1

12 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC254 views12 reactionsread 18 August 2026

18/50. Binance turned BNB from a trading fee discount into a loyalty program worth tens of billions of dollars. When Binance first launched in 2017, BNB was a very simple token. You held it on the exchange, paid your trading fees with it, and got a discount. For Binance, it was a straightforward way to get active traders to buy the token and keep their money inside the platform. But then Binance came up with someth

🔥5👍4👏3

11 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTC354 views13 reactionsread 18 August 2026

17/50. Bored Apes could not beat CryptoPunks on history, so they changed the rules of the game. In 2021, CryptoPunks were already legends. They had appeared back in 2017, people in crypto recognized them instantly, and some collectors treated them almost like digital artifacts. So when Bored Apes arrived, it seemed like they had only one option, try to make a better-looking collection and hope people switched. But

👍5🔥3🙊3💯1🙈1

9 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC441 views13 reactionsread 18 August 2026

16/50. Coinbase built Base without launching a token and turned its users into its biggest advantage. When Coinbase launched Base in 2023, the Ethereum Layer 2 market was already crowded. Arbitrum, Optimism, and dozens of other networks were competing for developers, users, and liquidity, and most of them were trying to win in roughly the same way, promising faster transactions, lower fees, and a token that might be

4👍3🔥3👀1👏1💊1

8 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC410 views12 reactionsread 18 August 2026

15/50. MicroStrategy was a boring $1 billion software company until Michael Saylor bet everything on Bitcoin. In 2020, MicroStrategy was a perfectly successful IT company that sold enterprise software and was worth around $1 billion. The problem was that the market did not expect anything particularly interesting from it. The company had been moving in roughly the same direction for years, its business had stayed mo

👍4🔥3👏2😁2🤓1

7 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC392 views13 reactionsread 18 August 2026

14/50. Terra built a nearly $40 billion ecosystem around a single number: 20%. Imagine your bank tells you, “Deposit your money with us, and we'll pay you 20% a year.” You'd probably assume it was a scam. But just a few years ago, that exact promise brought millions of people into crypto. At the center of this story was one number: 20%. To be precise, Anchor actually paid 19.45% APY, but the entire market simply re

👍53🔥3🤔2

6 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC390 views13 reactionsread 18 August 2026

13/50. NBA sold basketball highlights for over $200 million a month, even though you could watch them for free on YouTube. Some things seem impossible to sell. Like a short video that's already available on YouTube. But then the NBA started selling game-winning shots, LeBron dunks, Curry three-pointers, and other iconic highlights, and within a few months this idea was generating more than $200 million in monthly tr

4👍42🏆1👏1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @Bogdan_and_Xena. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 34,659 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

chatgpt.com1 post · 13 May 2026 – 13 May 2026 · example post
crypto.com1 post · 25 July 2026 – 25 July 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bogdan & Xena” (@Bogdan_and_Xena), 118,885 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bogdan_and_Xena.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.