Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بلایندیت مجازی

Channel

بلایندیت مجازی

@Blinddattee

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

129,771subscribers

+30,752 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001393184772
TypeChannel
Username@Blinddattee
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 October 2026
Measurements held40
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Blinddattee

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

96,670129,771113,220.57 August 2026 — 99,019 subscribers7 August 2026 — 99,019 subscribers8 August 2026 — 98,874 subscribers9 August 2026 — 98,658 subscribers10 August 2026 — 98,448 subscribers11 August 2026 — 98,237 subscribers12 August 2026 — 98,025 subscribers13 August 2026 — 97,901 subscribers14 August 2026 — 97,626 subscribers16 August 2026 — 97,357 subscribers17 August 2026 — 97,123 subscribers18 August 2026 — 96,878 subscribers19 August 2026 — 96,670 subscribers20 August 2026 — 96,918 subscribers22 August 2026 — 105,419 subscribers23 August 2026 — 104,305 subscribers25 August 2026 — 103,833 subscribers26 August 2026 — 103,476 subscribers27 August 2026 — 103,042 subscribers28 August 2026 — 102,620 subscribers29 August 2026 — 102,300 subscribers30 August 2026 — 102,227 subscribers31 August 2026 — 102,177 subscribers1 September 2026 — 102,048 subscribers2 September 2026 — 101,827 subscribers3 September 2026 — 101,638 subscribers5 September 2026 — 101,292 subscribers8 September 2026 — 100,696 subscribers11 September 2026 — 100,005 subscribers13 September 2026 — 99,426 subscribers14 September 2026 — 99,072 subscribers16 September 2026 — 107,857 subscribers19 September 2026 — 108,529 subscribers25 September 2026 — 116,492 subscribers4 October 2026 — 111,008 subscribers8 October 2026 — 122,076 subscribers13 October 2026 — 119,036 subscribers14 October 2026 — 118,314 subscribers15 October 2026 — 117,874 subscribers16 October 2026 — 129,771 subscribers7 August 202616 October 2026
40 measurements spanning 70 days, net +30,752. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 91,705–134,736 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Oct 2026, 14:00129,771+11,897
15 Oct 2026, 14:00117,874-440
14 Oct 2026, 17:07118,314-722
13 Oct 2026, 05:01119,036-3,040
8 Oct 2026, 19:58122,076+11,068
4 Oct 2026, 11:40111,008-5,484
25 Sept 2026, 22:35116,492+7,963
19 Sept 2026, 04:15108,529+672
16 Sept 2026, 16:19107,857+8,785
14 Sept 2026, 16:2299,072-354
13 Sept 2026, 00:5899,426-579
11 Sept 2026, 05:01100,005-691
8 Sept 2026, 09:35100,696-596
5 Sept 2026, 02:19101,292-346
3 Sept 2026, 09:53101,638-189
2 Sept 2026, 04:44101,827-221
1 Sept 2026, 03:18102,048-129
31 Aug 2026, 06:11102,177-50
30 Aug 2026, 06:29102,227-73
29 Aug 2026, 05:04102,300first reading

Engagement

531 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 144 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.88%
avg views ÷ 129,771 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,740
211 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.173%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
211
of 531 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 172 of 211 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 October 2026
Posts held531 (6 August 2026 – 16 October 2026)
Views total789,660
Reactions total1,165
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Oct 2026, 13:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 04s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,946 reactions across 382 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,01252.0%
👍24112.4%
🔥1939.92%
😁1628.32%
🥰995.09%
👏522.67%
👀392.00%
😍301.54%
😈281.44%
😐241.23%
💔190.976%
😘150.771%
🤪140.719%
😎110.565%
🤯50.257%
👻20.103%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 396 of the 531 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,946 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 531 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 16 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Oct 2026, 12:29 UTC≈3,780 views3 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Photo

با پیام دادن به ما به خانمی میرسین و دیت تراز دارین.🥹🤭❤️ @Blinddattee

👍2❤1

Signed ᖴᗩᖇGOᒪ⸸

16 Oct 2026, 09:19 UTC≈7,730 views3 reactionsread 16 October 2026

اگر میخاین بعدی شما باشید پیام بدینننن بچینیم براتون🤭👇🏻 @matuio88

❤2👍1

16 Oct 2026, 09:18 UTC≈7,470 views7 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Photo

انقد دیتای موفقمون زیاده نمیدونم کدومارو بزارم😂🤌🏻 #دیت_موفق

❤5🔥2

16 Oct 2026, 07:26 UTC≈7,640 views2 reactionsread 16 October 2026

از لحاظِ روحی نیاز دارم یکساعت بی وقفه توسطِ تو لیسیده بشم.❤️‍🔥 @Blinddattee

❤2

Signed ᖴᗩᖇGOᒪ⸸

16 Oct 2026, 05:01 UTC≈6,140 views5 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Photo

-Ymmm🥢 @Blinddattee

🔥4🥰1

Signed ᖴᗩᖇGOᒪ⸸

15 Oct 2026, 20:42 UTC≈9,060 views11 reactionsread 16 October 2026

چهار وجب بغلت، تنها لوکیشنی که دوست ندارم کسی جز خودم اونجا باشه @Blinddattee

❤7🥰4

15 Oct 2026, 18:31 UTC≈10,900 views14 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Photo

Yumy🙊 @Blinddattee

🔥9❤4😁1

Signed ᖴᗩᖇGOᒪ⸸

15 Oct 2026, 16:15 UTC≈8,030 views5 reactionsread 16 October 2026

دختر و پسرای سکسی و داف پیام بدین تنها نباشید.💜🤤 @matuio88

🔥5

Signed ᖴᗩᖇGOᒪ⸸

15 Oct 2026, 15:43 UTC≈7,790 views11 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Photo

خیلی‌ از جمله‌ی ”‌به خاطر تو”‌ خوشم میاد، به خاطر تو میخوام‌ بیام. به خاطر تو اومدم. به خاطر تو انجامش دادم. به خاطر تو، تو، تو.🩵 @Blinddattee

❤11

Signed roghye

15 Oct 2026, 08:27 UTC≈7,460 views1 reactionsread 16 October 2026

🐙هزینه دیت ها به چه صورت هست؟ ما کلا 3 نوع دیت داریم🐬 ✅1.دیت عادی مثل بقیه جاها مبلغ این دیت 250هزار تومن هست و کاملا ناشناس برگذار خواهد شد.🐳 ✅2 دیت VIP در این دیت عکس شما به خانوم نشان داده خواهد شد در صورتی که اوکی باشند دیت شما برگذار خواهد شد در اینصورت شما ۸۰ درصد مسیر را طی کرده اید و فقط بستگی به اخلاقیات و خلق و خوی شما دارد هزینه این دیت 450هزار تومن هست.🐳 ✅3. دیت CIP در این موارد تمامی شرایط مانند شمار…

❤1

Signed ᖴᗩᖇGOᒪ⸸

15 Oct 2026, 06:08 UTC≈3,760 views7 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Photo

𝚼𝕺𝖀𝕽 𝕳𝖀𝕲 🌟 : @Blinddattee

❤7

Signed ᖴᗩᖇGOᒪ⸸

Showing the 12 most recent of 531 posts we hold for @Blinddattee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Blinddattee edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Sept 2026, 11:42 UTCAnonymous Poll185 voters

👀👇؟

  1. ▫️ چیزایی که درباره خودش میگه9%
  2. ▫️ سؤالایی که ازم می‌پرسه21%
  3. ▫️ نحوه شوخی و حرف زدنش22%
  4. ▫️ واکنشش وقتی باهاش مخالفم16%
  5. ▫️ چیزایی که بین حرفاش خودش رو نشون میده31%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Sept 2026, 16:51 UTCAnonymous Poll80 voters

💭 اگه قرار باشه فقط ۳ ویژگی رو برای پارتنرت انتخاب کنی، کدوم‌ها رو انتخاب می‌کنی؟ 👀❤️

  1. 🧠 طرز فکر و درک متقابل54%
  2. ❤️ مهربونی و توجه49%
  3. 😂 شوخ‌طبعی و بامزه بودن26%
  4. 🤝 وفاداری و قابل اعتماد بودن68%
  5. 💰 استقلال و ثبات مالی23%
  6. 😍 ظاهر و جذابیت35%
  7. 🗣️ ارتباط خوب و بلد بودنِ حرف زدن24%

The shares total 279%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 531 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 16 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بلایندیت مجازی” (@Blinddattee), 129,771 subscribers as measured 16 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Blinddattee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.