Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for بلاك ليست ماب السرقه

Channel

بلاك ليست ماب السرقه

@Black_llist

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,780subscribers

-116 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002177427241
TypeChannel
Username@Black_llist
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Black_llist

Growth

1,7801,8961,8387 August 2026 — 1,896 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,896 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,894 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,890 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,875 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,859 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,845 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,828 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,809 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,796 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,780 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 26 days, net -116. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,763–1,913 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 04:151,780-16
30 Aug 2026, 12:281,796-13
27 Aug 2026, 05:431,809-19
24 Aug 2026, 05:231,828-17
20 Aug 2026, 22:441,845-14
18 Aug 2026, 08:031,859-16
14 Aug 2026, 23:081,875-15
11 Aug 2026, 13:551,890-4
8 Aug 2026, 04:011,894-2
7 Aug 2026, 10:021,896no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:561,896first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.32%
avg views ÷ 1,780 subscribers
Avg views / post
113
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (24 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total225
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 05:37 UTC107 viewsread 7 August 2026

سلام عليكم يا اخوان منتحل ترك كلكم بلكوه عشان لو حاول يسرق احد تشوف انك انت مبلكه و كذا بتعرف انه المنتحل مب الاصلي بلكوه : منتحل ( حرامي )👎: @TRK_669 الاصلي ( مضمون )✅ : @TRK_966

5 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC118 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ksa_on_topPhoto

اي واحد يسوم و هو مب صامل تراه يخرب المزاد و يقطع رزق صاحب السلعه و يقطع رزقي الله لا يسامح اي احد يسوم و هو مب صامل والله ان الحركات ذي ماهي حركات رجال الله قبل لا تسوم تأكد و احسب حساباتك ثم سوم قسم بالله شيء يقهر تراي ما اخذ ريال من المزادات و وراي ٦٠٠ الف شغله يجي ذا يقعد يخرب فوقها والله شيء يغبن وش مصلحتك تجي تخرب علي و تقطع رزق الناس مسوي فله انت الحين ؟ الله يقطع رزقه دبل هاذا الي اقول والله

19 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC734 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

شوفو الفرق بين المنتحل ( الحرامي ) و الاصلي ( الوسيط ) دقوو على كل شيء ١ - مكان اليوزر ممكن يحطلك اليوزر بالبايو ٢ - على الارقام و حروف الكبيتل و السمول ٣ - على ايدي فورت حق الوسيط

14 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC567 viewsread 7 August 2026

الرجاء الحذر ❗️، منتحل جديد لترك منتحل ( حرامي )👎: @TRK_669 الاصلي ( مضمون )✅ : @TRK_966

10 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC609 viewsread 7 August 2026

الرجاء الحذر ❗️، منتحل جديد لترك منتحل ( حرامي )👎: @TPK_966 الاصلي ( مضمون )✅ : @TRK_966

30 Jun 2026, 00:00 UTC877 viewsread 7 August 2026

الحرامي توضح افعاله .

Signed Munther Al-Shammari 🇸🇦~

30 Jun 2026, 00:00 UTC908 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

منزله بلاك وحاط بقروبه تيفن موثوق هههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههههه

Signed Munther Al-Shammari 🇸🇦~

29 Jun 2026, 00:01 UTC745 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

من آداب دينك يا جاهل انك تتبادل الاحترام مع الغير الي اسلوبهم نفسه يراجعون نفسهم ضروري والله لن ذا اسمه تخلف لولا واجبي المخلص لديني ولا دعست عليه قليل الادب ذا و من الان اقولكم اي احد عديم اسلوب بينطرد من قروبي و ممكن كل القروبات

28 Jun 2026, 23:03 UTC596 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

وش التشوه البصري ذا ليتك ما انتحلتني يا رجل 😂🤣🤣. الزبده انتبهو من المنتحلين !

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Black_llist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“بلاك ليست ماب السرقه” (@Black_llist), 1,780 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Black_llist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.