8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1,273. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 51,575β53,230 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 16:28
51,766
-207
13 Aug 2026, 04:14
51,973
-185
12 Aug 2026, 00:52
52,158
-227
11 Aug 2026, 02:01
52,385
-113
10 Aug 2026, 03:11
52,498
-159
9 Aug 2026, 03:11
52,657
-290
8 Aug 2026, 00:41
52,947
-92
7 Aug 2026, 14:19
53,039
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
21.5%
avg views Γ· 51,766 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,100
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.644%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
30 (21 July 2026 β 13 August 2026)
Views total
334,490
Reactions total
2,103
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
β1,700
Videos
β72
Links
β1,190
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 15 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
2,103 reactions across 28 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
π
560
26.6%
β€
475
22.6%
π₯
471
22.4%
π
371
17.6%
π³
226
10.7%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 2,103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$JACKET π₯
Black leather becomes the uniform of the AI age. JACKET transforms this cultural signal into a community meme coin and verifiable reward engine on the BNB chain. JACKET is an independent community response to this cultural signal. The image is for reference only. The token is the project. This website does not endorse or sell any clothing items.
https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0x29dcd29F4Ec9f08485F87e7777BC46β¦
$ELIZA π₯
elizaOS is a TypeScript framework for building AI agents capable of autonomous thinking, learning, and action. It allows for customization, plugin additions, and deployment anywhere.
https://dexscreener.com/bsc/0x56ADADF82E3346eb8317628df5ce1f776F89014D
Ca: 0xea17df5cf6d172224892b5477a16acb111182478
Market is heating up again. π₯π
New opportunities are appearing every day. Stay locked in, do your own research, and be ready when the right setups come. ππ³
We're just getting started Yamii β€οΈ
This chart is going absolutely crazy and itβs getting noticed everywhere. Even the normies are starting to catch on. ππ₯
https://dexscreener.com/solana/6HSBtfqrKz4zxpVLyVTp7jbiY88BVYs61g2PNP4sJmMF
$MARSCOIN
$59M
The reason i am Marscoin on these green candles and relativly high, is because the odds of CZ buying this coin is super high at the moment.
Will explain more in the message below
$HORSE - 208X Potential
Called around the $7.6K market cap and tracked through the move.
A strong example of what early positioning can look like when the right setup and momentum come together.
Always DYOR WAGMI!!
SOL has slipped back into the low 72s tonight, even with BTC still holding around 64.5k
It has spent the entire week trapped between roughly 72-74, but the bigger issue is that it hasnβt followed BTCβs recovery. Every move toward 74-75 keeps getting sold before SOL can build any momentum
The most interesting Solana news is a new fee proposal that could significantly increase the amount of SOL burned. If approved, rβ¦
π₯30β€27π21π14
Signed Mr. WHALE [Never DM First]
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @Big_Whales_Call. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππ πͺπππππ¦ ππππ π³β (@Big_Whales_Call), 51,766 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Big_Whales_Call.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.