Channel
@BestNewsakura1688
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,130subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001859864534 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BestNewsakura1688 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BestNewsakura1688 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 1,130 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 1,127 | +4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 1,123 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 1,119 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 1,117 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 771 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#Spareport 🏟️ 戰鬥場地：BestNewSakuraSpa（尖沙咀） ⚔️ 切磋對手：寶寶 💰 練功學費：1500 📊 戰力評級（天花板級別） 相頭：⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐（10 / 10） 身材：⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐（10 / 10） 服務：⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐（10 / 10） ⚔️ 詳細戰況： 休假充電完畢的寶寶，回歸後簡直狀態爆棚、火辣指數直衝天花板！一推開房門，那股致命的吸引力就讓人差點失控、想直接就地正法👺 無奈夏日炎炎滿身汗水，唯有立馬卸下防備，抱著寶寶直奔水床開展第一回合的「水上混戰」 久未「露面」的小美人本身就已經水源充足，再配合上 Nuru 的無敵加乘，她瞬間化身靈動的小海豚，在我全身肆意遊走衝擊，那種貼肉滑動的酥麻感，簡直爽到筆墨難以形容🤤 難得與小美人重逢，豈能浪費一分一秒？迅速沖水後，立馬轉移陣地回大床，修煉最終的「大合體」 這一局我決定反客為主，先由我溫柔地吻遍她那雪白滑溜帶着淡淡甜香的胴體…
#Spareport 運動場： BestNewSakuraSpa （尖沙咀） 運動同伴：宝宝，小糖糖 評分： 相頭 10/ 10 身材 10/ 10 服務10/ 10 過程： 寶寶，小糖糖雙飛 一開門就見到兩個美女等著我,而話不說就把我的衣服脫了,我都急不及待給他一個吻,因為時間關係我們立刻去洗浴,水床部分就已經差點受不了,小糖糖在上面,寶寶攻擊下面,差點水床都受不了. 在水床享受完之後立刻沖到床上,先來上半部,兩個人好似搶食一樣,我的小弟弟給他們玩弄在掌鼓之中,我怕我頂唔住就立刻去下半部,寶寶先上,在我上面搖來搖去,觀感十足.小糖糖在旁邊打氣,一邊打氣一邊攻擊我. 實在受不了一輪抽插已經出咗第一次. 之後兩個人一齊幫我按摩. 按了十分鐘後就到小糖糖.小糖糖和寶寶的身形實在一流.我第二次都堅持唔到好耐又出了. 下次仲一定要再過嚟搵佢哋 家用：3000 感受： ————————…
尖沙咀 主題spa 噴水床 高清Av.nuru 噴射紅酒七彩泡泡浴🛁 專業按摩 深喉水💋 抓龍根 潮吹 69 絲襪👙情趣制服💯高跟鞋👠角色扮演🤱❤️💣🛁🚿💆♀ 🍷🍷🍷 運動場:👉BestNewSakura Spa 女仔:超強情緒價值💃甜心 運動場入口:👇👇👇 @BestNewSakuraSpa
#Spareport 🏟️ 戰鬥場地：BestNewSakuraSpa（尖沙咀） ⚔️ 切磋對手：Celine小妹妹 💰 練功學費：1500 大洋 📊 戰力評級（天花板級別） 相頭：⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐（9 / 10） 身材：⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐（10 / 10） 服務：⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐（10 / 10） 📝 詳細戰況 收到客服線報，話有位驚世「小可愛」全新到港。今日收工二話不說，即刻衝去仙女窩！一推開房門，真係「嘩」咗一聲😳 小妹妹，你到底夠唔夠秤㗎？🤔 童顏無知的外表下，居然有對無敵車頭燈🤩 嗰種強烈的反差感真係令人窒息！事不宜遲，九秒九剝衫洗白白。Celine副偈簡直係稀世奇珍：一對香甜大包、一條水蛇腰，再加埋結實屁股仔，睇到已經想霸王硬上弓👺 本來以為佢傻更更，點知功力非常深厚，將水床發揮得淋漓盡致😋 真係小啲定力都走火，唯有急急過水上床大合體！只能說青春真係無敵，Celine體力充沛，前後左右各種體位都應付自如，最後被…
尖沙咀 主題spa 噴水床 高清Av.nuru 噴射紅酒七彩泡泡浴🛁 專業按摩 深喉水💋 抓龍根 潮吹 69 絲襪👙情趣制服💯高跟鞋👠角色扮演🤱❤️💣🛁🚿💆♀ 🍷🍷🍷 運動場:👉BestNewSakura Spa 女仔:長腿大波💃甜心 運動場入口:👇👇👇 @BestNewSakuraSpa
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @BestNewsakura1688. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 345,792 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BestNewSakuraSpa好評區” (@BestNewsakura1688), 1,130 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BestNewsakura1688.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.