Channel
@Bahgat_almagals
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,464subscribers
-24 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002085411018 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bahgat_almagals |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bahgat_almagals |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 8,464 | -19 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 8,483 | -5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 8,488 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:02 | 8,488 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 April 2026 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 999 |
| Reactions total | 36 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
115 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 105 | 91.3% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 6.09% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.74% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ليس عليك أن تُزهر اليوم، ولا أن تُثبت لأحد أنك بخير. يكفي أنك ما زلت تحاول، وما زلت تستيقظ كل صباح وفي قلبك رغبة صغيرة بأن تصبح أيامك أجمل هذه الرغبة وحدها دليل على أن الأمل لم يغادر روحك. اللهم اجعل لنا من اسمك اللطيف نصيبًا، وألطف بقلوبنا فيما أخفيته عنا، واكتب لنا خيرًا يفوق ما تمنيناه. ❤️🩹.
❤4💔2
على الأقل يجب أن يمتلك المرء مِنّا كتفًا يميل عليه وقتما تَميل الدُنيا فوق رأسه، أن يكون لدى كلٌّ منا شخصًا واحدًا قادرًا على الاختباء فيه من سخافات أفكاره؛ ألّا يحارب الإنسان منا وحده. — هدير علاء.
❤7
يدبِّرُ الأمر وأنتَ غَارِقٌ في القَلقْ.
❤6
وأن أرضى، حتى أُبصر الأيام بسعةٍ، فتبقى كلُّ الأشياء في قلبي نضِرة»
❤5😢1
وددت لو أفدي من أحبّه بشكلٍ استثنائي، فلا أُقاسمه همَّه وإنما أستأثر أنا به وأعطيه راحتي، ولا أشاركه حزنه وإنما آخذه أنا وأعطيه فرحي، ولا أهوّن عليه ضيقه وإنما أحتفظ به وأهديه انبساطي، ولا أواسيه في شوكِه وإنما أحمله عنه وأنبت فيه زهوري، ولا أقول له «فداك» وإنما أقول له «فديتك» - يوسف الدموكي
❤6
عَلى أملٍ أنْ يُسفِر هَذا الركض عَن أيامٍ جميلة ..
❤5
رُبما لم تتجلى الحكمة بعد .. رُبما لم تظهر في شكل نهاية سعيدة، أو بداية تستحق أن يُحتفى بها .. لكن وحده الإيمان بخير الأقدار في أضيق الساعات وأثقلها، هو من صدق اليقين🤍
❤6
. أحسدُ الطّير، كلما خَذلهُ المكان غَادر.
❤8
قال سُفيان الثوري رحمَه الله : :كُنا إذ أردنا أن يُستجاب لنا دَعَوُنا لإخواننا بظَهر الغَيب ". اذكروني بدعوة 🤍
❤6
“وأنا متعبٌ يا أمي، مجهدٌ كثيراً من وطأة الأيام، وقلق مما سيؤولُ إليه مصيري. أريدُ أن أبكي كي أتنفس أكثر، فالغصةُ تملأ قلبي إلى فمه النازف، وحلقي جافٌ كصحراء خامدة في الداخل”. — محمود درويش
❤5
يؤنسني نصّ المنفلوطي حين قَال: [ولكنّي أعلمُ أنّ لهذا الكوْن إلهًا رحيمًا، يعلمُ دخائلَ القلوب وسرائر النّفوس، ويرى لوعة الحُزن في أفئدة المحزونين، ولاعج الشّقاء بين جوانح الأشقياء، فأنا أكِلُ أمرَك إليه وأتركك بين يديه، فهو أرحم بك من جميع الرّحماء.] 🤍
❤6
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Bahgat_almagals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حَـنـيـن⁶³” (@Bahgat_almagals), 8,464 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bahgat_almagals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.